Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2244-2255. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10222-0. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
To assess the therapeutic response of HCC to antiangiogenic therapy plus immunotherapy by integrating RECIST 1.1 and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response at the 6th week to predict overall survival (OS).
This retrospective study included 150 and 214 patients with HCC who received combination therapy in training and validation cohorts. The medical images and AFP levels obtained at baseline and 6th week were collected. AFP response stratification: partial response (PR): AFP% ≥ 75% decline; stable disease (SD): AFP% < 75% decline and ≤ 10% elevation; progressive disease (PD): AFP% > 10% elevation. The alpha-RECIST was: PR: RECIST 1.1-PR or AFP-PR; PD: AFP-PD or RECIST 1.1-PD and does not satisfy AFP-PR; SD: neither PR nor PD. OS was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. The predictive ability of various criteria was evaluated using the concordance index and time-dependent area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve.
RECIST 1.1 achieved significant OS stratification (p = 0.020) for AFP < 20 ng/mL. For AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL, alpha-RECIST showed better performance than RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and AFP response according to C-index (0.73 vs 0.66 vs 0.68 vs 0.69). The National Cancer Center (NCC) strategy utilized RECIST 1.1 for AFP < 20 ng/mL and alpha-RECIST for AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL and showed better performance than RECIST 1.1, mRECIST and AFP response according to C-index (0.73 vs 0.67 vs 0.69 vs 0.64). The performances of alpha-RECIST and NCC Strategy were confirmed in the validation cohort (C-index = 0.77 and 0.74).
The alpha-RECIST and NCC Strategy achieved better survival stratification in patients with HCC under combination therapy in the AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL group and the whole cohort compared to the RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and AFP response.
The alpha-RECIST and National Cancer Center strategy are optimal methods for determining therapeutic response to a combination of anti-angiogenic therapy plus immunotherapy and facilitating accurate prognostic stratification for HCC in the AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL group and the whole cohort, which may help oncologists for early identification of responders and progression at 6 weeks and clinical decision-making.
• RECIST 1.1 is indicated for patients with baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) < 20 ng/mL. • For patients with baseline AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL, integrating RECIST 1.1 and AFP response (alpha-RECIST) may aid in the early identification of survival benefits and progression definition prior to the administration of additional efficacious drugs. • The National Cancer Center strategy is an optimal stratified strategy for determining therapeutic response to a combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy for HCC based on baseline AFP levels.
通过整合第 6 周的 RECIST 1.1 和甲胎蛋白(AFP)应答来评估 HCC 对抗血管生成治疗加免疫治疗的治疗反应,以预测总生存期(OS)。
本回顾性研究纳入了 150 名和 214 名在训练队列和验证队列中接受联合治疗的 HCC 患者。收集了基线和第 6 周的医学图像和 AFP 水平。AFP 应答分层:部分应答(PR):AFP%≥75%下降;稳定疾病(SD):AFP%<75%下降且≤10%升高;进展性疾病(PD):AFP%>10%升高。α-RECIST 为:PR:RECIST 1.1-PR 或 AFP-PR;PD:AFP-PD 或 RECIST 1.1-PD 且不符合 AFP-PR;SD:既非 PR 也非 PD。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线比较 OS。使用一致性指数和时间依赖的接收器操作特征曲线下面积评估各种标准的预测能力。
对于 AFP<20ng/mL 的患者,RECIST 1.1 达到了显著的 OS 分层(p=0.020)。对于 AFP≥20ng/mL 的患者,α-RECIST 与 RECIST 1.1、mRECIST 和 AFP 反应相比,表现出更好的性能,根据 C 指数(0.73 比 0.66 比 0.68 比 0.69)。国家癌症中心(NCC)策略将 RECIST 1.1 用于 AFP<20ng/mL,将α-RECIST 用于 AFP≥20ng/mL,根据 C 指数(0.73 比 0.67 比 0.69 比 0.64),表现出比 RECIST 1.1、mRECIST 和 AFP 反应更好的性能。α-RECIST 和 NCC 策略的性能在验证队列中得到了证实(C 指数=0.77 和 0.74)。
在 AFP≥20ng/mL 组和整个队列中,与 RECIST 1.1、mRECIST 和 AFP 反应相比,α-RECIST 和 NCC 策略在接受抗血管生成治疗加免疫治疗的 HCC 患者中实现了更好的生存分层。
α-RECIST 和国家癌症中心策略是确定抗血管生成治疗加免疫治疗联合治疗反应并为 AFP≥20ng/mL 组和整个队列进行准确预后分层的最佳方法,这可能有助于肿瘤学家早期识别应答者和 6 周时的进展,并进行临床决策。
RECIST 1.1 适用于基线 AFP<20ng/mL 的患者。
对于基线 AFP≥20ng/mL 的患者,整合 RECIST 1.1 和 AFP 应答(α-RECIST)可能有助于在给予额外有效药物之前,早期识别生存获益和进展定义。
基于基线 AFP 水平,国家癌症中心策略是确定抗血管生成治疗和免疫治疗联合治疗 HCC 的治疗反应的最佳分层策略。