• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转化治疗后完全缓解的肝细胞癌患者非手术策略与肝切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析

Non-surgery strategy versus hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with complete response after conversion therapy: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Jie, Hu Yanfeng, Zhou Lingyi, Yang Yanyan, Chen Junyu, Chen Hao, Wang Haibiao

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo, 315048, Zhejiang, China.

Department of General Surgery, Ninghai Chengguan Hospital, Ningbo, 315600, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec 28;22(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03645-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03645-6
PMID:39731166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11681720/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is ongoing debate surrounding the optimal therapeutic strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients achieving complete response (CR) after conversion therapy. This meta-analysis compares the prognostic outcomes of non-surgery strategies with hepatectomy.

METHODS

The systematic searches were conducted up to April 11, 2024, across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, analyzing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on whether patients achieved a clinical CR or a radiologic CR, as well as the regimen of non-surgery strategy employed.

RESULTS

Six studies with 481 patients were identified. Non-surgery strategy was linked to significantly worse PFS compared to hepatectomy (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60 to 2.90). However, there was not a notable difference in OS between the two groups (HR = 1.35; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.96). Subgroup analysis showed that for patients with clinical CR, there were no notable differences in both PFS and OS. Conversely, patients with radiologic CR experienced significantly worse PFS and OS when treated with non-surgery strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-surgery strategy might provide comparable outcomes to hepatectomy for HCC patients with clinical CR, as opposed to those with radiologic CR. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

摘要

背景

对于接受转化治疗后达到完全缓解(CR)的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者,最佳治疗策略一直存在争议。本荟萃分析比较了非手术策略与肝切除术的预后结果。

方法

截至2024年4月11日,在PubMed、Embase、科学网和考克兰图书馆进行系统检索,分析无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。根据患者是否达到临床CR或放射学CR以及所采用的非手术策略方案进行亚组分析。

结果

共纳入6项研究,481例患者。与肝切除术相比,非手术策略与显著更差的PFS相关(风险比[HR]=2.15;95%置信区间[CI],1.60至2.90)。然而,两组之间的OS没有显著差异(HR=1.35;95%CI,0.93至1.96)。亚组分析表明,对于临床CR患者,PFS和OS均无显著差异。相反,放射学CR患者采用非手术策略治疗时,PFS和OS显著更差。

结论

对于临床CR的HCC患者,非手术策略可能提供与肝切除术相当的结果,而对于放射学CR患者则不然。需要进一步研究来证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/a0fb82538408/12957_2024_3645_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/387e7ad37089/12957_2024_3645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/b47d7ca6154f/12957_2024_3645_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/10dba1c162d2/12957_2024_3645_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/a0fb82538408/12957_2024_3645_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/387e7ad37089/12957_2024_3645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/b47d7ca6154f/12957_2024_3645_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/10dba1c162d2/12957_2024_3645_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6d9/11681720/a0fb82538408/12957_2024_3645_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-surgery strategy versus hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with complete response after conversion therapy: a meta-analysis.转化治疗后完全缓解的肝细胞癌患者非手术策略与肝切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec 28;22(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03645-6.
2
Hepatic resection alone versus in combination with pre- and post-operative transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯肝切除术与联合术前及术后经动脉化疗栓塞术治疗肝细胞癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 3;6(34):36838-59. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5426.
3
Comparison of liver resection and radiofrequency ablation in long-term survival among patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and high-quality propensity score-matched studies.比较肝切除术和射频消融术在早期肝细胞癌患者长期生存中的疗效:随机试验和高质量倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 19;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03330-8.
4
Hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for the initial treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肝切除术与经动脉化疗栓塞术用于肝细胞癌的初始治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2015 Jul 30;6(21):18715-33. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4134.
5
Transarterial chemoembolization versus hepatic resection in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: a meta-analysis.经动脉化疗栓塞术与肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Aug 10;9:4431-40. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S86629. eCollection 2015.
6
Watch-and-wait strategy vs. resection in patients with radiologic complete response after conversion therapy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matching comparative study.影像学完全缓解后转换治疗初不可切除的肝细胞癌患者的观察等待策略与切除术比较:倾向评分匹配的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2545-2555. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001155.
7
Prognostic analysis and limited efficacy of adjuvant TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.肝切除术后肝细胞癌辅助性经动脉化疗栓塞术的预后分析及疗效有限:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 7;410(1):92. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03663-2.
8
Comparison of different adjuvant therapy regimen efficacies in patients with high risk of recurrence after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.比较肝癌根治性切除术后复发高危患者不同辅助治疗方案的疗效。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10505-10518. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04874-0. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
9
Survival benefit of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肝切除术与经动脉化疗栓塞治疗合并门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌的生存获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3895-z.
10
The prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对接受肝切除术的肝细胞癌患者的预后意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Precision medicine: an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with a novel RBPMS-MET fusion sensitive to crizotinib.精准医学:一例对克唑替尼敏感的具有新型RBPMS-MET融合基因的肝内胆管癌
Oncologist. 2025 Jan 17;30(1). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae340.
2
Salvage Surgery for Initially Unresectable HCC With PVTT Converted by Locoregional Treatment Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and Anti-PD-1 Antibody.局部治疗联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和抗 PD-1 抗体使最初不可切除的 HCC 伴门静脉癌栓转化后行补救性手术。
Oncologist. 2024 Aug 5;29(8):e1041-e1050. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae032.
3
Watch-and-wait strategy vs. resection in patients with radiologic complete response after conversion therapy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matching comparative study.
影像学完全缓解后转换治疗初不可切除的肝细胞癌患者的观察等待策略与切除术比较:倾向评分匹配的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2545-2555. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001155.
4
Outcomes of Salvage Surgery Versus Non-Salvage Surgery for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Conversion Therapy with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.经肝动脉化疗栓塞联合仑伐替尼加抗 PD-1 抗体转化治疗后初始不可切除的肝细胞癌行挽救性手术与非挽救性手术的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 May;31(5):3073-3083. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14944-3. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
5
Clinical Complete Response After Conversion Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Is Salvage Hepatectomy Necessary?不可切除肝细胞癌转化治疗后的临床完全缓解:是否需要挽救性肝切除术?
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2023 Dec 5;10:2161-2171. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S442341. eCollection 2023.
6
Survival benefit of liver resection following complete response to transarterial chemoembolization for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.经肝动脉化疗栓塞术完全缓解后行肝切除术治疗中期肝细胞癌的生存获益:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1019-1027. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000942.
7
Reclassification of therapeutic response of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma to anti-angiogenic therapy and immunotherapy using alpha RECIST.使用 α RECIST 对不可切除肝细胞癌的抗血管生成治疗和免疫治疗的疗效进行重新分类。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr;34(4):2244-2255. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10222-0. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
8
Radiographic and α-fetoprotein response predict pathologic complete response to immunotherapy plus a TKI in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.影像学和 α-胎蛋白反应预测免疫治疗联合 TKI 治疗肝细胞癌的病理完全缓解:一项多中心研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 May 9;23(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10898-z.
9
Hepatectomy After Conversion Therapy for Initially Unresectable HCC: What is the Difference?初始不可切除的肝癌经转化治疗后的肝切除术:有何差异?
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2022 Dec 22;9:1353-1368. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S388965. eCollection 2022.
10
Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040.2020 年全球原发性肝癌负担及 2040 年预测。
J Hepatol. 2022 Dec;77(6):1598-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021. Epub 2022 Oct 5.