Suppr超能文献

“从技术上讲是堕胎”:了解美国对堕胎的看法和定义。

"Technically an abortion": Understanding perceptions and definitions of abortion in the United States.

机构信息

Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA.

Guttmacher Institute, 125 Maiden Lane, 7th Floor, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2023 Oct;335:116216. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116216. Epub 2023 Sep 5.

Abstract

Anti-abortion legislation in the United States exploits misinformation and ignores medical definitions to curtail access to essential healthcare. Little is known about how individuals most likely to need this care define abortion, in general or as distinct from miscarriage, and how this might impact access to, utilization of, and experiences of care. Using mixed-method card sort and vignette data from cognitive interviews (n = 64) and a national online survey (n = 2009), we examined individuals' understandings of pregnancy outcomes including abortion and miscarriage. Our findings show that people hold varying ideas of what constitutes an abortion. Many respondents considered 'intent' when classifying pregnancy outcomes and focused on intervention to distinguish between miscarriages and abortions. Particularly, medical intervention was found as a defining feature of abortion. Lack of knowledge regarding pregnancy experiences and ambiguity surrounding early stages of pregnancy also influenced respondents' understanding of abortion. We find that abortion and miscarriage definitions are socially constructed and multi-layered. Advancing our understanding of abortion and miscarriage definitions improves reproductive health research by elucidating potential areas of confusion that may lead to misreporting of reproductive experiences as well as highlighting ways that blurred definitions may be exploited by abortion opponents.

摘要

美国的反堕胎立法利用错误信息,无视医学定义,限制了获得基本医疗保健的机会。人们对最有可能需要这种护理的个人如何定义堕胎(一般而言或与流产不同)知之甚少,以及这可能如何影响获得、利用和护理体验。我们使用认知访谈(n=64)和全国在线调查(n=2009)的混合方法卡片分类和小插图数据,研究了个人对包括堕胎和流产在内的妊娠结局的理解。我们的研究结果表明,人们对堕胎的定义存在不同的看法。许多受访者在对妊娠结局进行分类时考虑到“意图”,并侧重于干预措施来区分流产和堕胎。特别是,医疗干预被认为是堕胎的一个决定性特征。缺乏关于妊娠经历的知识以及对妊娠早期的模糊认识也影响了受访者对堕胎的理解。我们发现,堕胎和流产的定义是社会构建的,具有多层次性。通过阐明可能导致生殖经历错误报告的潜在困惑领域,并强调模糊定义可能被堕胎反对者利用的方式,我们对堕胎和流产定义的理解得到了提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c1/10552775/7350d2ee752e/nihms-1931903-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
"Technically an abortion": Understanding perceptions and definitions of abortion in the United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Oct;335:116216. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116216. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
4
Situating stigma in stratified reproduction: Abortion stigma and miscarriage stigma as barriers to reproductive healthcare.
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2016 Dec;10:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
6
Effect of ACASI on Reporting of Abortion and Other Pregnancy Outcomes in the US National Survey of Family Growth.
Stud Fam Plann. 2018 Sep;49(3):259-278. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12068. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
8
A review of reproductive outcomes of women with two consecutive miscarriages and no living child.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Aug;39(6):816-821. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1576600. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):376.e1-376.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.035. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;70:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Financial Barriers Are Associated With Self-Managed Abortion in Indiana: Results From a Mixed-Methods Study in 2021-2022.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;57(2):185-197. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70008. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
3
The "abortion imaginary": Shared perceptions and personal representations among everyday Americans.
Sci Adv. 2024 Mar;10(9):eadj3135. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj3135. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Pregnancy Complications After : The Role of EMTALA.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;25(1):79-85. doi: 10.5811/westjem.61457.

本文引用的文献

1
Pregnancy recognition trajectories: a needed framework.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2167552. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2167552.
3
Randomized experimental testing of new survey approaches to improve abortion reporting in the United States.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Dec;54(4):142-155. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12217. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
4
Physician beliefs about contraceptive methods as abortifacients.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb;228(2):237-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.039. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
5
Improving abortion underreporting in the USA: a cognitive interview study.
Cult Health Sex. 2023 Jan;25(1):126-141. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2022.2113434. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
State-Level Variation in Abortion Stigma and Women and Men's Abortion Underreporting in the USA.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2021 Dec;40(6):1149-1161. doi: 10.1007/s11113-021-09657-4. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
The Impact of Abortion Underreporting on Pregnancy Data and Related Research.
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Aug;25(8):1187-1192. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03157-9. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
The economics of abortion and its links with stigma: A secondary analysis from a scoping review on the economics of abortion.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 18;16(2):e0246238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246238. eCollection 2021.
9
Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys.
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):899-925. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00886-4.
10
"Like a mother-daughter relationship": Community health intermediaries' knowledge of and attitudes to abortion in Karnataka, India.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;239:112525. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112525. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验