Chen Xuejuan, Wang Qing, Cui Baoshan, Chen Guogui, Xie Tian, Yang Wenxin
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Research and Development Center for Watershed Environmental Eco-Engineering, Advanced Institute of Natural Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China; Yellow River Estuary Wetland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Education, Shandong, China.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 15;346:118965. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118965. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
The decline of biodiversity can occur with a substantial delay following habitat loss, degradation, and other environmental changes, such as global warming. Considerable time lags may be involved in these responses. However, such time lags typically pose a significant but often unrecognized challenge for biodiversity conservation across a wide range of taxa and ecosystems. Here, we synthesize the current knowledge, categories, manifestations under different scenarios and impacts of ecological time lags. Our work reveals that studies on ecosystem structure lags are far more than ecosystem process and function lags. Due to the presence of these time-lag effects, the 'window phase' typically exists, which is widely recognized as 'relaxation time', providing a particular opportunity for biodiversity conservation. The manifestations of time lags vary under different scenarios. In addition, the different mechanisms that can result in ecological time lags are hierarchically nested, in which mechanisms at the population and metapopulation level have routinely been suggested as explanations for ecological time lags. It generally takes longer time to reach equilibrium at the metapopulation level than it takes for effects to be fully expressed at the level of individuals. Finally, we propose corresponding implications for biodiversity conservation and management. Our research will provide priorities for science and management on how to address the impact of ecological time lags to mitigate future attrition of biodiversity.
生物多样性的下降可能在栖息地丧失、退化以及其他环境变化(如全球变暖)之后出现显著延迟。这些响应可能涉及相当长的时间滞后。然而,这种时间滞后通常对广泛的分类群和生态系统中的生物多样性保护构成重大但往往未被认识到的挑战。在此,我们综合了当前关于生态时间滞后的知识、类别、不同情景下的表现形式及其影响。我们的研究表明,关于生态系统结构滞后的研究远多于生态系统过程和功能滞后的研究。由于这些时间滞后效应的存在,通常会出现“窗口阶段”,这被广泛认为是“弛豫时间”,为生物多样性保护提供了一个特殊的机会。时间滞后的表现在不同情景下有所不同。此外,能够导致生态时间滞后的不同机制是层次嵌套的,其中种群和集合种群水平的机制通常被认为是生态时间滞后的解释。在集合种群水平达到平衡通常比在个体水平效应完全显现所需的时间更长。最后,我们提出了对生物多样性保护和管理的相应启示。我们的研究将为科学和管理提供关于如何应对生态时间滞后的影响以减轻未来生物多样性丧失的优先事项。