Wale J, Geffen G
Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(4):483-96. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90093-x.
Dichotic word monitoring tasks were given to four cases with complete forebrain comissurotomy, three cases of partial section of the corpus callosum, one case of right hemispherectomy, and control subjects. The task involved a unimanual response to target words in either ear (divided attention, Experiment 1) or to target words in one voice that changed ears unpredictably (focused attention, Experiment 2). Left-ear extinction, defined as chance level (25%) detection of left-ear targets and 75% right-ear target detection, varied both between and within subjects during divided attention. No examples of extinction were obtained with focused attention. These results highlight attentional aspects of dichotic listening. Neither the structural, hemispheric asymmetry model (Cortex 3, 163-178, 1967), nor the cognitive, attention priming model (Attention and Performance V, pp. 87-97, Academic Press, New York) could account for the obtained results. We propose an alternative account in terms of the different processing modes and attentional capabilities of the two cerebral hemispheres.
对4例完全性前脑连合切开术患者、3例胼胝体部分切开术患者、1例右半球切除术患者以及对照组受试者进行双耳分听单词监测任务。该任务包括对任一耳中的目标单词做出单手反应(分散注意力,实验1),或对一个声音中不可预测地切换至另一耳的目标单词做出反应(集中注意力,实验2)。左耳消音定义为左耳目标检测正确率为随机水平(25%),右耳目标检测正确率为75%,在分散注意力期间,受试者之间以及受试者内部左耳消音情况均有所不同。集中注意力时未出现消音示例。这些结果突出了双耳分听中的注意力方面。无论是结构性半球不对称模型(《皮质》第3卷,第163 - 178页,1967年),还是认知性注意力启动模型(《注意力与表现V》,第87 - 97页,学术出版社,纽约)都无法解释所获得的结果。我们根据两个大脑半球不同的处理模式和注意力能力提出了另一种解释。