Boles D B
Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(4):511-9. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90095-3.
Two manual reaction-time experiments examined visual field differences for the judgment of number. All told, three tasks (recognition/enumeration, magnitude judgment and oddity judgment) were performed on three nonverbal indicators of number (dot clusters, bargraphs and dials) and two verbal indicators (word names of numbers and digits). The results indicated that field differences depended largely on display format, not on the task. Thus, dot clusters, bargraphs and dials all showed a left visual field superiority, while words showed a right visual field superiority. There was no evidence of lateralization for digits.
两项手动反应时实验研究了数字判断中的视野差异。总共对三种数字的非语言指标（点簇、条形图和表盘）以及两种语言指标（数字的单词名称和数字）进行了三项任务（识别/计数、大小判断和奇偶判断）。结果表明，视野差异很大程度上取决于显示格式，而非任务。因此，点簇、条形图和表盘都显示出左视野优势，而单词则显示出右视野优势。没有证据表明数字存在侧化现象。
