Rosin Magda, Mackay Sally, Ni Mhurchu Cliona
School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Nutr Diet. 2023 Nov;80(5):452-462. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12844. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
This study aimed to identify and evaluate tools and resources used to support the implementation of workplace healthy food and drink policies, primarily in Australia and New Zealand.
A scoping grey literature review included searches of government agencies and non-governmental organisations' websites in six English-speaking countries, public health nutrition intervention databases and Google search engine queries. Paper-based and digital tools were included if they were written in English, referred to within a policy or on a policy's website, and primarily targeting supply-side stakeholders. Tools were evaluated on two domains: 'Features' (summarised descriptively) and 'Usability and Quality' (with inter-rater reliability scores calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient).
Twenty paper-based tools were identified relating to Australian (n = 14) and New Zealand (n = 6) policies, and a further six digital tools were identified from Australia (n = 3) and Canada (n = 3). Target audiences included workplace managers, food providers and suppliers. The paper-based tools focused on general implementation guidance. In contrast, digital tools tended to support specific elements of policy implementation. 'Usability and Quality' scores ranged from 2.9 to 4.5 (out of 5.0) for paper-based tools, and 3.9 to 4.2 for digital tools, with a moderate agreement between reviewer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.523, p = 0.010).
A range of tools have been developed to support the implementation of workplace healthy food and drink policies. Understanding the strengths and limitations of current tools will assist in developing improved aids to support policy implementation.
本研究旨在识别和评估用于支持工作场所健康食品和饮料政策实施的工具及资源,主要针对澳大利亚和新西兰。
一项范围界定性灰色文献综述包括对六个英语国家的政府机构和非政府组织网站、公共卫生营养干预数据库以及谷歌搜索引擎查询结果的检索。如果纸质和数字工具是用英文撰写、在政策中或政策网站上被提及且主要针对供应方利益相关者,则将其纳入。工具在两个领域进行评估:“特征”(以描述性方式总结)和 “可用性与质量”(使用组内相关系数计算评分者间信度得分)。
识别出20个与澳大利亚(n = 14)和新西兰(n = 6)政策相关的纸质工具,以及另外6个来自澳大利亚(n = 3)和加拿大(n = 3)的数字工具。目标受众包括工作场所经理、食品供应商和供应商。纸质工具侧重于一般实施指南。相比之下,数字工具倾向于支持政策实施的特定要素。纸质工具的“可用性与质量”得分在2.9至4.5(满分5.0)之间,数字工具的得分在3.9至4.2之间,评分者得分之间具有中等一致性(组内相关系数0.523,p = 0.010)。
已开发出一系列工具来支持工作场所健康食品和饮料政策的实施。了解当前工具的优势和局限性将有助于开发改进的辅助工具以支持政策实施。