Suppr超能文献

传统制造或使用3D打印机制造的义齿牙齿与义齿基托树脂之间的剪切粘结强度比较。

A comparison of the shear bond strength between denture teeth and denture base resins manufactured either conventionally or with a 3D printer.

作者信息

Aydin Nazli, Uslu Kavrama Fatma, Yosuncigir Halit, Ucar Yurdanur

机构信息

Lecturer, Cukurova University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Adana, Turkey; and Abdi Sutcu Vocational School of Health Services, Cukurova University, Balcali, Adana, Turkey.

Private practice, Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):742.e1-742.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.035. Epub 2023 Sep 22.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Limited information is available on the shear bond strength (SBS) between denture teeth and denture base resins fabricated using a stereolithography (SLA) 3-dimensional (3D) printer.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the SBS between denture teeth and the denture base resins produced with the conventional method and with a 3D printer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Conventional or 3D printed denture teeth were included in the study. The denture base resins were manufactured either conventionally or with a 3D printer. Four subgroups were tested: conventional teeth-conventional base resin (CT-CB), conventional teeth-printed base resin (CT-PB), printed teeth-conventional base resin (PT-CB), and printed teeth-printed base resin (PT-PB). The maxillary molars were combined with Ø5×2.5-mm-cylindrical denture base resin. Shear bond testing was performed by applying a parallel force to the denture teeth-denture base resin interface by using a blade-edge chisel with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure occurred. SBS and elastic modulus (EM) were recorded. One-way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett T3 post hoc test was used for the statistical analysis (α=.05). The failure modes of the specimens were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference (P<.05) was found between the evaluated groups for the SBS and EM values. PT-PB showed the highest SBS value (15.4 ±2.7 MPa), and CT-PB showed the lowest (0.9 ±0.7 MPa). The PT-CB group showed the highest EM value (62.74 ±20.80 GPa), and the CT-PB group showed the lowest (29.46 ±28.40 GPa). The CT-CB and CT-PB specimens showed mostly adhesive failure; none of the PT-PB specimens showed adhesive failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional printing led to a better bond between the denture teeth and the denture base resin compared with the conventional method. Although these findings need to be supported by clinical studies, the use of 3D printers is appropriate in the production of denture teeth and denture bases.

摘要

问题陈述

关于使用立体光刻(SLA)三维(3D)打印机制造的义齿牙齿与义齿基托树脂之间的剪切粘结强度(SBS)的信息有限。

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估义齿牙齿与采用传统方法和3D打印机生产的义齿基托树脂之间的SBS。

材料与方法

研究纳入了传统或3D打印的义齿牙齿。义齿基托树脂采用传统方法或3D打印机制造。测试了四个亚组:传统牙齿-传统基托树脂(CT-CB)、传统牙齿-打印基托树脂(CT-PB)、打印牙齿-传统基托树脂(PT-CB)和打印牙齿-打印基托树脂(PT-PB)。将上颌磨牙与直径5×2.5毫米的圆柱形义齿基托树脂结合。通过使用刃口凿以1毫米/分钟的十字头速度对义齿牙齿-义齿基托树脂界面施加平行力进行剪切粘结测试,直至发生破坏。记录SBS和弹性模量(EM)。采用单因素方差分析,随后进行Dunnett T3事后检验进行统计分析(α = 0.05)。还分析了标本的破坏模式。

结果

评估组之间的SBS和EM值存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.05)。PT-PB显示出最高的SBS值(15.4±2.7兆帕),CT-PB显示出最低的(0.9±0.7兆帕)。PT-CB组显示出最高的EM值(62.74±20.80吉帕),CT-PB组显示出最低的(29.46±28.40吉帕)。CT-CB和CT-PB标本大多表现为粘结破坏;PT-PB标本均未表现出粘结破坏。

结论

与传统方法相比,三维打印导致义齿牙齿与义齿基托树脂之间的粘结更好。尽管这些发现需要临床研究的支持,但3D打印机在义齿牙齿和义齿基托的生产中是适用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验