• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大实施科学中跨部门合作的证据:创建一个协作、跨部门、跨机构、多学科团队,为出院时无家可归且医疗情况复杂的患者提供服务。

Expanding the evidence for cross-sector collaboration in implementation science: creating a collaborative, cross-sector, interagency, multidisciplinary team to serve patients experiencing homelessness and medical complexity at hospital discharge.

作者信息

Anderson Amanda Joy, Noyes Katia, Hewner Sharon

机构信息

School of Nursing, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

Division of Health Services Policy and Practice, Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2023 Sep 8;3:1124054. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1124054. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/frhs.2023.1124054
PMID:37744643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10515621/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with medical and social complexity require care administered through cross-sector collaboration (CSC). Due to organizational complexity, biomedical emphasis, and exacerbated needs of patient populations, interventions requiring CSC prove challenging to implement and study. This report discusses challenges and provides strategies for implementation of CSC through a collaborative, cross-sector, interagency, multidisciplinary team model.

METHODS

A collaborative, cross-sector, interagency, multidisciplinary team was formed called the Buffalo City Mission Recuperative Care Collaborative (RCU Collaborative), in Buffalo, NY, to provide care transition support for people experiencing homelessness at acute care hospital discharge through a medical respite program. Utilizing the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and feedback from cross-sector collaborative team, implementation strategies were drawn from three validated ERIC implementation strategy clusters: 1) Develop stakeholder relationships; 2) Use evaluative and iterative strategies; 3) Change infrastructure.

RESULTS

Stakeholders identified the following factors as the main barriers: organizational culture clash, disparate visions, and workforce challenges related to COVID-19. Identified facilitators were clear group composition, clinical academic partnerships, and strategic linkages to acute care hospitals.

DISCUSSION

A CSC interagency multidisciplinary team can facilitate complex care delivery for high-risk populations, such as medical respite care. Implementation planning is critically important when crossing agency boundaries for new multidisciplinary program development. Insights from this project can help to identify and minimize barriers and optimize utilization of facilitators, such as academic partners. Future research will address external organizational influences and emphasize CSC as central to interventions, not simply a domain to consider during implementation.

摘要

引言

患有复杂医疗和社会问题的患者需要通过跨部门协作(CSC)来提供护理。由于组织复杂性、生物医学重点以及患者群体需求的加剧,需要跨部门协作的干预措施在实施和研究方面具有挑战性。本报告讨论了相关挑战,并提供了通过协作、跨部门、跨机构、多学科团队模式实施跨部门协作的策略。

方法

在纽约州布法罗市成立了一个协作、跨部门、跨机构、多学科团队,称为布法罗市使命康复护理协作组织(RCU协作组织),通过医疗暂托计划为急性护理医院出院时无家可归的人提供护理过渡支持。利用实施变革的专家建议(ERIC)框架以及跨部门协作团队的反馈,从三个经过验证的ERIC实施策略集群中得出实施策略:1)发展利益相关者关系;2)使用评估和迭代策略;3)改变基础设施。

结果

利益相关者确定以下因素为主要障碍:组织文化冲突、不同的愿景以及与COVID-19相关的劳动力挑战。确定的促进因素包括明确的团队组成、临床学术伙伴关系以及与急性护理医院的战略联系。

讨论

跨部门协作的跨机构多学科团队可以促进为高风险人群提供复杂护理,例如医疗暂托护理。在跨机构界限开展新的多学科项目开发时,实施规划至关重要。该项目的见解有助于识别和最小化障碍,并优化促进因素(如学术伙伴)的利用。未来的研究将探讨外部组织影响,并强调跨部门协作是干预措施的核心,而不仅仅是实施过程中需要考虑的一个领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5f/10515621/17581085f050/frhs-03-1124054-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5f/10515621/6618183ca197/frhs-03-1124054-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5f/10515621/17581085f050/frhs-03-1124054-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5f/10515621/6618183ca197/frhs-03-1124054-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb5f/10515621/17581085f050/frhs-03-1124054-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Expanding the evidence for cross-sector collaboration in implementation science: creating a collaborative, cross-sector, interagency, multidisciplinary team to serve patients experiencing homelessness and medical complexity at hospital discharge.扩大实施科学中跨部门合作的证据:创建一个协作、跨部门、跨机构、多学科团队,为出院时无家可归且医疗情况复杂的患者提供服务。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Sep 8;3:1124054. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1124054. eCollection 2023.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Development and Implementation of a Medical Respite Program for People Experiencing Homelessness: An Analysis of a Cross-sectoral Partnership.发展和实施针对无家可归者的医疗暂息计划:跨部门合作的分析。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(4S):61-82. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0159.
5
Cross-sector co-creation of a community-based physical activity program for breast cancer survivors in Colombia.哥伦比亚基于社区的乳腺癌幸存者身体活动项目的跨部门共同创造。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 1;37(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac073.
6
Interdisciplinary behavioral health provider perceptions of implementing the Collaborative Chronic Care Model: an i-PARIHS-guided qualitative study.跨学科行为健康服务提供者对实施协作式慢性病照护模式的看法:一项循证卫生保健实施促进框架指导下的定性研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Mar 30;4(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00407-5.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
8
9
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
10
Facilitators and barriers experienced by federal cross-sector partners during the implementation of a healthy eating campaign.联邦跨部门合作伙伴在实施健康饮食运动过程中所经历的促进因素和障碍。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2318-2328. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001264. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Care for ill-housed persons: access and professional proactivity in primary care.为居住条件差的人群提供护理:初级保健中的就医机会与专业主动性。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Aug 25;78Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e20230385. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0385. eCollection 2025.
2
Improving Cross-Sector Collaborations between Healthcare and Housing: Challenges and Strategies Identified by Unhoused People with Complex Health Needs.改善医疗保健与住房领域之间的跨部门合作:有复杂健康需求的无家可归者所面临的挑战与确定的策略
J Urban Health. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s11524-025-00966-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Navigator programme for hospitalised adults experiencing homelessness: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.针对住院无家可归成年人的导航者计划:一项实用随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e065688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065688.
2
Social Risk Adjustment In The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: A Systematic Review And Implications For Policy.医院再入院率降低计划中的社会风险调整:系统评价及对政策的启示。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1307-1315. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00614.
3
Minimally Disruptive Medicine: Progress 10 Years Later.
微创医学:十年后的进展
Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Feb;97(2):210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.09.003.
4
Nowhere to go: exploring the social and economic influences on discharging people experiencing homelessness to appropriate destinations in Toronto, Canada.无处可去:探索在加拿大多伦多将无家可归者送往适当目的地的社会和经济影响。
Can J Public Health. 2021 Dec;112(6):992-1001. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00561-0. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
Systematic Review of Care Coordination Interventions Linking Health and Social Services for High-Utilizing Patient Populations.高利用率患者人群的卫生与社会服务相衔接的照护协调干预措施的系统评价。
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Feb;25(1):73-85. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0057. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Consolidated Framework for Collaboration Research derived from a systematic review of theories, models, frameworks and principles for cross-sector collaboration.协作研究综合框架源自对跨部门协作的理论、模型、框架和原则的系统回顾。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 4;16(1):e0244501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244501. eCollection 2021.
7
Recovery-oriented intersectoral care between mental health hospitals and community mental health services: An integrative review.康复导向的精神卫生医院与社区精神卫生服务之间的跨部门合作:综合评价。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;67(6):788-800. doi: 10.1177/0020764020966634. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
8
Transitional Care Models for High-Need, High-Cost Adults in the United States: A Scoping Review and Gap Analysis.美国高需求、高花费成年人的过渡性护理模式:范围综述和差距分析。
Prof Case Manag. 2021;26(2):82-98. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000442.
9
The Organizational Risks Of Cross-Sector Partnerships: A Comparison Of Health And Human Services Perspectives.跨部门伙伴关系的组织风险:健康与人类服务视角的比较
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Apr;39(4):574-581. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01553.
10
Social Factors and Patient Perceptions Associated With Preventable Hospital Readmissions.与可预防的医院再入院相关的社会因素及患者认知
J Patient Exp. 2020 Feb;7(1):19-26. doi: 10.1177/2374373518825143. Epub 2019 Feb 7.