Livesay J R
Percept Mot Skills. 1986 Oct;63(2 Pt 1):619-26. doi: 10.2466/pms.1986.63.2.619.
Utilizing the Halstead Impairment Index derived from the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological battery as the defining criterion for the presence or absence of brain-behavior deficiency, the current investigation examined the hypothesis that the Wechsler Deterioration Index is a predictively efficient measure for screening behaviorally impaired subjects from nonimpaired subjects. Subjects were 35 adult examinees consecutively referred for neuropsychological assessment and were divided into two groups on the basis of Halstead indices. The impaired group included 12 men and 7 women whose ages ranged from 17 to 59 yr.; the nonimpaired group were 10 men and 6 women whose ages ranged from 16 to 43 yr. The Wechsler indices for the impaired and nonimpaired groups represent two significantly different populations with the discrepancy between the two groups' scores falling within the predicted direction. A positive correlation between the Halstead Index and the Wechsler Index was indicated for all subjects, but no significant relationship between the Halstead Index and other psychometric ratios. Implications of the results are restricted because there was no normal control group and independent neurological screening was limited.
利用源自哈尔斯特德-雷顿神经心理成套测验的哈尔斯特德损伤指数作为存在或不存在脑-行为缺陷的界定标准,当前的调查检验了以下假设:韦氏衰退指数是一种从未受损受试者中筛选出行为受损受试者的预测有效指标。受试者为35名连续接受神经心理评估的成年受测者,根据哈尔斯特德指数分为两组。受损组包括12名男性和7名女性,年龄在17至59岁之间;未受损组为10名男性和6名女性,年龄在16至43岁之间。受损组和未受损组的韦氏指数代表了两个显著不同的群体,两组分数之间的差异处于预测方向内。所有受试者的哈尔斯特德指数和韦氏指数之间呈正相关,但哈尔斯特德指数与其他心理测量比率之间无显著关系。由于没有正常对照组且独立的神经学筛查有限,结果的影响受到限制。