Farina Stefania, Pezzuto Beatrice, Vignati Carlo, Laveneziana Pierantonio, Agostoni Piergiuseppe
Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Paris, France.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 8;10:1241379. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1241379. eCollection 2023.
Hyperventilation and inadequate cardiac output (CO) increase are the main causes of exercise limitation in pulmonary hypertension (PH). Intrapulmonary blood flow partitioning between ventilated and unventilated lung zones is unknown. Thoracic impedance cardiography and inert gas rebreathing have been both validated in PH patients for non-invasive measurement of CO and pulmonary blood flow (PBF), respectively. This study sought to evaluate CO behaviour in PH patients during exercise and its partitioning between ventilated and unventilated lung areas, in parallel with ventilation partitioning between ventilated and unventilated lung zones.
Eighteen PH patients (group 1 or 4) underwent a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with a three-step loaded workload protocol. The steps occurred at 0%, 20%, 40%, and 60% of peak workload reached during a preliminary maximum CPET. Ventilatory parameters, arterial blood gases, CO, PBF, and intrapulmonary shunt (calculated as the difference between CO and PBF) were obtained at each step, combining thoracic impedance cardiography and an inert gas rebreathing technique.
Dead space ventilation observed throughout the exercise was about 40% of total ventilation. A progressive increase of CO from 4.86 ± 1.24 L/min (rest) to 9.41 ± 2.63 L/min (last step), PBF from 3.81 ± 1.41 L/min to 7.21 ± 2.93 L/min, and intrapulmonary shunt from 1.05 ± 0.96 L/min to 2.21 ± 2.28 L/min was observed. Intrapulmonary shunt was approximately 20% of CO at each exercise step.
Although the study population was small, the combined non-invasive CO measurement seems a promising tool for deepening our knowledge of lung exercise haemodynamics in PH patients. This technique could be applied in future studies to evaluate PH treatment influences on CO partitioning, since a secondary increase of intrapulmonary shunt is undesirable.
过度通气和心输出量(CO)增加不足是肺动脉高压(PH)患者运动受限的主要原因。肺内通气和未通气肺区之间的血流分配情况尚不清楚。胸阻抗心动图和惰性气体再呼吸技术已分别在PH患者中得到验证,可用于无创测量CO和肺血流量(PBF)。本研究旨在评估PH患者运动期间的CO行为及其在通气和未通气肺区之间的分配情况,并与通气和未通气肺区之间的通气分配情况进行对比。
18例PH患者(1组或4组)采用三步负荷工作方案进行心肺运动试验(CPET)。步骤分别为初步最大CPET期间达到的峰值工作量的0%、20%、40%和60%。在每个步骤中,结合胸阻抗心动图和惰性气体再呼吸技术,获取通气参数、动脉血气、CO、PBF和肺内分流(计算为CO与PBF之差)。
整个运动过程中观察到的死腔通气约占总通气量的40%。观察到CO从4.86±1.24升/分钟(静息)逐渐增加到9.41±2.63升/分钟(最后一步),PBF从3.81±1.41升/分钟增加到7.21±2.93升/分钟,肺内分流从1.05±0.96升/分钟增加到2.21±2.28升/分钟。在每个运动步骤中,肺内分流约占CO的20%。
尽管研究人群规模较小,但联合无创CO测量似乎是深化我们对PH患者肺运动血流动力学认识的一个有前景的工具。由于肺内分流的二次增加是不理想的,该技术可应用于未来研究,以评估PH治疗对CO分配的影响。