Kabakoff Heather, Yu Leyao, Friedman Daniel, Dugan Patricia, Doyle Werner K, Devinsky Orrin, Flinker Adeen
Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave., New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, New York University School of Engineering, 6 MetroTech Center Ave., Brooklyn, NY, 11201, USA.
bioRxiv. 2024 Jan 17:2023.09.14.557732. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.14.557732.
Cortical regions supporting speech production are commonly established using neuroimaging techniques in both research and clinical settings. However, for neurosurgical purposes, structural function is routinely mapped peri-operatively using direct electrocortical stimulation. While this method is the gold standard for identification of eloquent cortical regions to preserve in neurosurgical patients, there is lack of specificity of the actual underlying cognitive processes being interrupted. To address this, we propose mapping the temporal dynamics of speech arrest across peri-sylvian cortices by quantifying the latency between stimulation and speech deficits. In doing so, we are able to substantiate hypotheses about distinct region-specific functional roles (e.g., planning versus motor execution). In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed 20 patients (12 female; age range 14-43) with refractory epilepsy who underwent continuous extra-operative intracranial EEG monitoring of an automatic speech task during clinical bedside language mapping. Latency to speech arrest was calculated as time from stimulation onset to speech arrest onset, controlling for individual speech rate. Most instances of motor-based arrest (87.5% of 96 instances) were in sensorimotor cortex with mid-range latencies to speech arrest with a distributional peak at 0.47 seconds. Speech arrest occurred in numerous regions, with relatively short latencies in supramarginal gyrus (0.46 seconds), superior temporal gyrus (0.51 seconds), and middle temporal gyrus (0.54 seconds), followed by relatively long latencies in sensorimotor cortex (0.72 seconds) and especially long latencies in inferior frontal gyrus (0.95 seconds). Nonparametric testing for speech arrest revealed that region predicted latency; latencies in supramarginal gyrus and in superior temporal gyrus were shorter than in sensorimotor cortex and in inferior frontal gyrus. Sensorimotor cortex is primarily responsible for motor-based arrest. Latencies to speech arrest in supramarginal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus (and to a lesser extent middle temporal gyrus) align with latencies to motor-based arrest in sensorimotor cortex. This pattern of relatively quick cessation of speech suggests that stimulating these regions interferes with the outgoing motor execution. In contrast, the latencies to speech arrest in inferior frontal gyrus and in ventral regions of sensorimotor cortex were significantly longer than those in temporoparietal regions. Longer latencies in the more frontal areas (including inferior frontal gyrus and ventral areas of precentral gyrus and postcentral gyrus) suggest that stimulating these areas interrupts a higher-level speech production process involved in planning. These results implicate the ventral specialization of sensorimotor cortex (including both precentral and postcentral gyri) for speech planning above and beyond motor execution.
在研究和临床环境中,支持言语产生的皮质区域通常使用神经成像技术来确定。然而,对于神经外科手术而言,在手术期间通常使用直接皮质电刺激对结构功能进行常规映射。虽然这种方法是识别神经外科患者中需要保留的明确皮质区域的金标准,但对于实际被中断的潜在认知过程缺乏特异性。为了解决这个问题,我们建议通过量化刺激与言语缺陷之间的潜伏期来绘制跨颞叶周围皮质的言语停止的时间动态。这样做,我们能够证实关于不同区域特定功能作用(例如,计划与运动执行)的假设。在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们分析了20例难治性癫痫患者(12名女性;年龄范围14 - 43岁),他们在临床床边语言映射期间接受了对自动言语任务的连续术中颅内脑电图监测。言语停止的潜伏期计算为从刺激开始到言语停止开始的时间,并控制个体言语速率。大多数基于运动的停止情况(96例中的87.5%)发生在感觉运动皮质,言语停止的潜伏期处于中等范围,分布峰值在0.47秒。言语停止发生在多个区域,在缘上回(0.46秒)、颞上回(0.51秒)和颞中回(0.54秒)的潜伏期相对较短,其次是感觉运动皮质的潜伏期相对较长(0.72秒),尤其是额下回的潜伏期特别长(0.95秒)。对言语停止的非参数测试表明,区域可预测潜伏期;缘上回和颞上回的潜伏期比感觉运动皮质和额下回的潜伏期短。感觉运动皮质主要负责基于运动的停止。缘上回和颞上回(以及在较小程度上颞中回)的言语停止潜伏期与感觉运动皮质中基于运动的停止潜伏期一致。这种相对快速的言语停止模式表明刺激这些区域会干扰传出的运动执行。相比之下,额下回和感觉运动皮质腹侧区域的言语停止潜伏期明显长于颞顶叶区域。更靠前区域(包括额下回以及中央前回和中央后回的腹侧区域)的较长潜伏期表明刺激这些区域会中断参与计划的更高层次的言语产生过程。这些结果表明感觉运动皮质(包括中央前回和中央后回)在言语计划方面的腹侧专业化超出了运动执行。