Metelmann Isabella, Nagel Matthes, Schneider Bastian, Krämer Bernd, Kraemer Sebastian
Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, 04103, Germany.
Simba n3 GmbH, Oelsnitz, Saxony, 08606, Germany.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 18;15:325-332. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S425272. eCollection 2023.
The COVID-19 pandemic confronted prehospital emergency medical services (PHEMS) with immense challenges. This study aimed to investigate the development of PHEMS mission numbers and times in the COVID-affected region of Southwest Saxony (SWS).
This was a retrospective analysis of PHEMS in SWS during lockdown periods and equal time spans in the previous and following years. Differences were tested for statistical significance using the chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
The total number of missions showed a substantial drop during the first (-16.6%) and the second (-4.5%) lockdown period compared with the previous year. Next-year periods showed a recovery that was nearly equivalent to the starting point. The first lockdown period was not associated with longer overall mission times. The minutes spent at the scene differed significantly between the first lockdown period (31.1 ± 3.52 min), previous year (28.4 ± 4.84 min), and follow-up period (31.8 ± 0.98 min). During the second lockdown, the overall mission times (71.6 ± 2.91 min), response times in minutes (8.9 ± 0.49 min), and minutes spent at the scene (31.4 ± 2.99 min) were significantly longer. The minutes spent at the scene (32.3 ± 18.68 min) and the overall mission time (69.6 ± 1.92 min) remained significantly longer during the control period.
Our data confirm the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on German PHEMS. It can be concluded that nationwide lockdown measures led to lasting effects regarding a reduction in the total mission number, transport-on-site released-ratio, and emergency time intervals in the following year, without lockdown restrictions. The lasting effects on the transport-on-site released-ratio and emergency time intervals call for a re-evaluation of the delivery of emergency services during pandemics. These findings can inform future policy decisions and resource allocations to ensure optimal emergency medical services.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行给院前急救医疗服务(PHEMS)带来了巨大挑战。本研究旨在调查萨克森州西南部(SWS)受新冠疫情影响地区的PHEMS任务数量和时间的变化情况。
这是一项对SWS地区在封锁期以及前一年和后一年相同时间段内的PHEMS进行的回顾性分析。使用卡方检验和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)对差异进行统计学显著性检验。
与上一年相比,在第一次封锁期(下降16.6%)和第二次封锁期(下降4.5%),任务总数大幅下降。次年各时间段呈现出几乎恢复到起点的情况。第一次封锁期与总体任务时间延长无关。在第一次封锁期(31.1±3.52分钟)、上一年(28.4±4.84分钟)和随访期(31.8±0.98分钟),现场停留时间存在显著差异。在第二次封锁期间,总体任务时间(71.6±2.91分钟)、响应时间(8.9±0.49分钟)和现场停留时间(31.4±2.99分钟)显著延长。在对照期,现场停留时间(32.3±18.68分钟)和总体任务时间(69.6±1.92分钟)仍然显著更长。
我们的数据证实了严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行对德国PHEMS的影响。可以得出结论,全国范围的封锁措施在次年没有封锁限制的情况下,对任务总数、现场转运释放率和紧急时间间隔的减少产生了持久影响。对现场转运释放率和紧急时间间隔的持久影响要求重新评估大流行期间的紧急服务提供情况。这些发现可为未来的政策决策和资源分配提供参考,以确保最佳的紧急医疗服务。