Suppr超能文献

作为外来杂草生物防治剂的植物病原体:拮抗真菌会是决定防治剂成败的重要因素吗?

Plant pathogens as introduced weed biological control agents: Could antagonistic fungi be important factors determining agent success or failure?

作者信息

Den Breeyen Alana, Lange Claudia, Fowler Simon V

机构信息

Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.

Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.

出版信息

Front Fungal Biol. 2022 Jul 26;3:959753. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2022.959753. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Mycoparasitic interactions are common in nature, form part of the microbiota of plants, and are considered significant contributors to fungus-fungus antagonism. Mycoparasites kill plant pathogens, protect the plant from abiotic and biotic stressors, and reduce disease incidence and severity at the plant population level. Their exploitation as biocontrol agents in agriculture is well documented. However, mycoparasites may potentially affect classical fungal biocontrol agents of invasive weed species. Classical biological control, or biocontrol, of invasive weeds involves the intentional introduction of exotic, usually co-evolved plant pathogens and insects, for permanent establishment and long-term control of the target plant. Agent establishment, effectiveness, and safety are the critical elements for a successful weed biocontrol programme. Establishment and effectiveness of agents on the invasive plant often vary throughout the invaded range with about two-thirds of weed biocontrol agents failing to suppress their target weed. There are many documented reasons why weed biocontrol agents do not establish or are ineffective when they do, and the presence and accumulation of natural enemies in the invaded range is one of them. Endophyte-enriched, invasive weeds and those forming mutualistic associations with indigenous, native endophytes could explain the lack of consistency of some classical biological control introductions. However, another variable could be factored into the mix: mycoparasitism, where one fungus parasitises another, the natural enemies of the plant's natural enemies. In this review article, we introduce the concept of invasive weed biocontrol and the history of using plant pathogens as biocontrol agents. We discuss the success and failure of fungal agent programmes and delve into the patterns of success or failure, with a focus on the potential antagonistic role of endophytes and mycoparasites.

摘要

菌寄生相互作用在自然界中很常见,是植物微生物群的一部分,被认为是真菌 - 真菌拮抗作用的重要贡献者。菌寄生菌能杀死植物病原体,保护植物免受非生物和生物胁迫,并在植物种群水平上降低疾病发生率和严重程度。它们作为农业生物防治剂的应用已有充分记录。然而,菌寄生菌可能会对入侵杂草物种的传统真菌生物防治剂产生潜在影响。入侵杂草的经典生物防治,即生物防治,涉及有意引入外来的、通常是共同进化的植物病原体和昆虫,以实现对目标植物的永久定殖和长期控制。生物防治剂的定殖、有效性和安全性是成功的杂草生物防治计划的关键要素。生物防治剂在入侵植物上的定殖和有效性在整个入侵范围内往往各不相同,约三分之二的杂草生物防治剂无法抑制其目标杂草。有许多记录在案的原因解释了杂草生物防治剂为何无法定殖或定殖后无效,入侵范围内天敌的存在和积累就是其中之一。富含内生菌的入侵杂草以及与本地内生菌形成互利共生关系的杂草,可以解释一些经典生物防治引入缺乏一致性的原因。然而,另一个变量也可能起作用:菌寄生现象,即一种真菌寄生于另一种真菌,也就是植物天敌的天敌。在这篇综述文章中,我们介绍了入侵杂草生物防治的概念以及使用植物病原体作为生物防治剂的历史。我们讨论了真菌生物防治剂项目的成功与失败,并深入探讨成败模式,重点关注内生菌和菌寄生菌的潜在拮抗作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d009/10512343/ef2c79849958/ffunb-03-959753-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验