• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在农村环境中实施机器人妇科手术计划:对助理外科医生的存在和子宫切除术途径的影响。

Implementation of a Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Program in a Rural Setting: Impact on Presence of Assistant Surgeon and Route of Hysterectomy.

机构信息

Gynecology Department, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Williamsport, PA.

Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2023 Jul-Sep;27(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00035.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2023.00035
PMID:37746520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10516264/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Robotic surgical technology may obviate the need for an assistant surgeon when performing hysterectomy. In rural communities where physician shortages remain a major barrier to healthcare access, reducing the number of surgeons necessary to complete a hysterectomy would be of significant consequence. We sought to investigate the impact of robotic surgery on both the presence of an assistant surgeon and route of hysterectomy following implementation of a robotic surgery program at a single-site community hospital.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of hysterectomies performed before and after implementation of a robotic surgical program. Hysterectomies were classified by presence of an assistant surgeon, and by mode of hysterectomy (abdominal, laparoscopic, robotic, and vaginal). We observed the distribution of outcomes between the two study periods and compared them with the χ test.

RESULTS

Following implementation of a robotic surgical program we observed a statistically significant decrease in the presence of an assistant surgeon at the time of hysterectomy from 86.7% to 29.7%, p ≤ 0.0001. There was also an increase in the percentage of hysterectomies performed by minimally invasive technique from 67.0% to 87.4%, p ≤ 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

Following implementation of a robotic gynecologic surgery program at a single-site rural community hospital, we observed a reduction in the utilization of an assistant surgeon at time of hysterectomy. Additionally, we observed a significant increase in the rate of minimally invasive hysterectomies performed.

摘要

背景与目的

机器人手术技术在进行子宫切除术时可能不需要助手外科医生。在医生短缺仍然是获得医疗保健主要障碍的农村社区,减少完成子宫切除术所需的外科医生数量将具有重要意义。我们试图研究在单站点社区医院实施机器人手术计划后对助手外科医生的存在以及子宫切除术途径的影响。

方法

对实施机器人手术计划前后进行的子宫切除术进行回顾性图表审查。子宫切除术按助手外科医生的存在情况以及子宫切除术的方式(腹部、腹腔镜、机器人和阴道)进行分类。我们观察了两个研究期间的结果分布,并与 χ 检验进行了比较。

结果

在实施机器人手术计划后,我们观察到助手外科医生在子宫切除术中的存在率从 86.7%显著下降到 29.7%,p≤0.0001。微创技术进行的子宫切除术百分比也从 67.0%增加到 87.4%,p≤0.0001。

结论

在单站点农村社区医院实施机器人妇科手术计划后,我们观察到助手外科医生在子宫切除术时的使用率降低。此外,我们观察到微创子宫切除术的比例显著增加。

相似文献

1
Implementation of a Robotic Gynecologic Surgery Program in a Rural Setting: Impact on Presence of Assistant Surgeon and Route of Hysterectomy.在农村环境中实施机器人妇科手术计划:对助理外科医生的存在和子宫切除术途径的影响。
JSLS. 2023 Jul-Sep;27(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00035.
2
Gynecologic Surgical Subspecialty Training Decreases Surgical Complications in Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.妇科外科亚专科培训可减少良性微创全子宫切除术的手术并发症。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Mar;31(3):250-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.12.011. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人子宫肌瘤剔除术。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug;118(2):414-416. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications-surgical volume matters: a retrospective cohort study comparing complications of robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomies.经阴道微创手术治疗良性疾病-手术量很重要:一项比较机器人辅助腹腔镜和传统腹腔镜子宫切除术并发症的回顾性队列研究。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01340-2. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.多中心分析:比较由高手术量外科医生进行的机器人辅助、开放、腹腔镜及经阴道子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的效果
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jun;133(3):359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.010. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Impact of robotic technology on hysterectomy route and associated implications for resident education.机器人技术对子宫切除术途径的影响及其对住院医师教育的相关影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):196.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.037. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
7
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
8
Pedagogic Approach in the Surgical Learning: The First Period of "Assistant Surgeon" May Improve the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy.外科学习中的教学方法:“助理外科医生”的第一阶段可能会改善腹腔镜机器人辅助子宫切除术的学习曲线。
Front Surg. 2016 Nov 2;3:58. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00058. eCollection 2016.
9
Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.腹式子宫切除率的逐步降低:腹腔镜手术、机器人手术及外科医生因素的影响
J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):13-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0412-5. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
10
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的比较:社区实践中的手术结果
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in industry payments and volume and distribution of robot-assisted surgeries.行业支付情况以及机器人辅助手术的数量和分布趋势。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3215-3223. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11724-2. Epub 2025 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.腹腔镜手术与机器人手术治疗子宫内膜异位症的对比研究(LAROSE):一项多中心、随机、对照试验
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):996-1002.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.033. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
2
Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.比较标准腹腔镜子宫切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术手术时间的随机对照试验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;136(1):64-69. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
4
A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.一项比较阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术及机器人辅助子宫切除术的随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
5
State variability in supply of office-based primary care providers: United States, 2012.美国2012年门诊基层医疗服务提供者供应情况的州差异
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 May(151):1-8.
6
Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下骶骨阴道固定术比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):5-12. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000006.
7
Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的比较。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.
8
A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.一项比较传统腹腔镜全子宫切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜全子宫切除术的随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;208(5):368.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
9
Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.机器人与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):604-11. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265b61a.
10
Distribution of American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists fellows and junior fellows in practice in the United States.美国妇产科医师学会研究员和初级研究员在美国的执业分布。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;119(5):1017-22. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824cfe50.