Moen Michael, Noone Michael, Cholkeri-Singh Aarathi, Vassallo Brett, Locker Brian, Miller Charles
Department of OB/GYN, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, 1775 Dempster Street, Park Ridge, IL, 60068, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):13-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0412-5. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
The objective of this study is to describe changes in rates of types of hysterectomy at a tertiary care community teaching hospital since the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic techniques and to determine the effect of surgeon characteristics on route of hysterectomy. This is a retrospective analysis of types of hysterectomies performed for benign disease during five different years (1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009) at a large community teaching hospital. Hospital discharge data was reviewed to identify all hysterectomies performed during the first six months of each year of the study. Hospital charts were reviewed and patient characteristics, indication for surgery, type of hysterectomy and surgeon characteristics were recorded. Hysterectomies performed for malignancy, suspected malignancy, or postpartum hemorrhage were excluded. Types of hysterectomies included abdominal (AH), vaginal (VH), laparoscopic-assisted vaginal (LAVH), total laparoscopic (TLH), laparoscopic supracervical (LSH) and robotic-assisted (RH). The progressive introduction of newer minimally invasive surgical techniques (LAVH, TLH, LSH, and RH) resulted in an overall reduction in the abdominal hysterectomy rate from 77 to 35.2 % during the time of the study. The majority of abdominal, laparoscopic supracervical and robotic hysterectomies were performed by generalists, while the majority of vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomies were performed by fellowship trained subspecialists. Minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques significantly reduced the rate of abdominal hysterectomies. The LSH and RH were the techniques utilized by generalists as their most preferred minimally invasive surgical approaches to hysterectomy.
本研究的目的是描述自引入腹腔镜和机器人技术以来,在一家三级医疗社区教学医院子宫切除术类型的变化情况,并确定外科医生特征对子宫切除途径的影响。这是一项对一家大型社区教学医院在五个不同年份(1989年、1994年、1999年、2004年、2009年)因良性疾病实施的子宫切除术类型的回顾性分析。查阅医院出院数据以确定研究中每年前六个月进行的所有子宫切除术。查阅医院病历并记录患者特征、手术指征、子宫切除术类型和外科医生特征。排除因恶性肿瘤、疑似恶性肿瘤或产后出血而进行的子宫切除术。子宫切除术类型包括腹式(AH)、阴式(VH)、腹腔镜辅助阴式(LAVH)、全腹腔镜(TLH)、腹腔镜次全子宫(LSH)和机器人辅助(RH)。在研究期间,新型微创外科技术(LAVH、TLH、LSH和RH)的逐步引入使腹式子宫切除术的总体发生率从77%降至35.2%。大多数腹式、腹腔镜次全子宫和机器人辅助子宫切除术由普通外科医生实施,而大多数阴式、腹腔镜辅助阴式和全腹腔镜子宫切除术由经过专科培训的亚专科医生实施。微创子宫切除技术显著降低了腹式子宫切除术的发生率。LSH和RH是普通外科医生作为其最常用的微创子宫切除手术方法所采用的技术。