Ooshige Narumi, Matsunaka Eriko, Ueki Shingo, Takuma Sayuka
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Nutrition, University of Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Japanese Red Cross, Kyushu International College of Nursing, Fukuoka, Japan.
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2313-2341. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00184.
The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the experiences of nurses who work shifts during pregnancy.
Pregnancy is a process of rapid physical change that requires adaptation both mentally and physically. Many women continue to work during pregnancy, including in the nursing profession, but there are various risks associated with working while pregnant.
This review included studies that focused on the experiences of pregnant registered nurses, regardless of their level of qualification, working shifts in any workplace, including hospitals, nursing home facilities, or clinics, in any country. Nurses not involved in direct care (eg, advanced practice nurses, administrators, educators) were excluded.
The review followed the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. Published and gray literature were searched for via CINAHL (EBSCOhost), MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), and Igaku Chuo Zasshi (Japan Medical Abstracts Society). No language restrictions were imposed, and the date limit was set for 2013 to 2021. Two independent reviewers performed data collection, extraction, critical appraisal, and analysis. Unequivocal and credible findings were used to develop categories, which were then synthesized to provide a set of comprehensive findings that were graded according to ConQual.
Five qualitative studies were included (2 from the USA, 2 from Japan, and 1 from Korea), from which 23 findings with narrative illustrations were extracted. Of these findings, 22 were assessed as unequivocal and 1 as credible. The studies were low to moderate quality based on the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. All studies used qualitative methodologies, including phenomenology, qualitative description, and the grounded theory approach. Results were integrated into 8 categories and 3 synthesized findings. The first synthesized finding was that nurses struggle with the physical burden of pregnancy and work environments that threaten continued pregnancy. The second was that nurses achieve work-pregnancy compatibility by disclosing their pregnancy and obtaining support. The third was that development as a nurse results from continuing to work during pregnancy.
Pregnant nurses face a harsh work environment; the support they receive after disclosing their pregnancy allows them to balance work and pregnancy; and they feel that they grow as professionals by continuing to work even if they are pregnant. More research is needed to inform support systems for pregnant nurses.
PROSPERO CRD42022309674.
A Japanese-language version of the abstract of this review is available: http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31.
本系统评价的目的是综合孕期轮班工作护士的经历。
怀孕是一个身体快速变化的过程,需要在心理和身体上进行适应。许多女性在孕期仍继续工作,包括从事护理职业,但孕期工作存在各种风险。
本评价纳入了关注孕期注册护士经历的研究,无论其资质水平如何,在任何工作场所轮班工作,包括医院、疗养院设施或诊所,在任何国家。不参与直接护理的护士(如高级执业护士、管理人员、教育工作者)被排除在外。
本评价遵循JBI定性系统评价方法。通过CINAHL(EBSCOhost)、MEDLINE(EBSCOhost)、PsycINFO(EBSCOhost)和《医学中央杂志》(日本医学摘要协会)检索已发表和灰色文献。不设语言限制,日期限制设定为2013年至2021年。两名独立评审员进行数据收集、提取、批判性评价和分析。明确且可信的研究结果用于形成类别,然后进行综合以提供一组全面的研究结果,并根据ConQual进行分级。
纳入了五项定性研究(两项来自美国,两项来自日本,一项来自韩国),从中提取了23项带有叙述性例证的研究结果。在这些研究结果中,22项被评估为明确,1项被评估为可信。根据JBI定性研究批判性评价清单,这些研究质量为低到中等。所有研究均采用定性方法,包括现象学、定性描述和扎根理论方法。结果整合为8个类别和3项综合研究结果。第一项综合研究结果是,护士在应对孕期身体负担和威胁持续妊娠的工作环境方面存在困难。第二项是,护士通过披露自己的怀孕情况并获得支持来实现工作与怀孕的平衡。第三项是,护士在孕期继续工作从而实现职业发展。
怀孕护士面临恶劣的工作环境;她们在披露怀孕情况后获得的支持使她们能够平衡工作和怀孕;并且她们觉得即使怀孕也通过继续工作而在职业上有所成长。需要更多研究为怀孕护士的支持系统提供信息。
PROSPERO CRD42022(309674)。
本评价的日文摘要版本可获取:http://links.lww.com/SRX/A31 。