Suppr超能文献

眼部神经性疼痛的评估。

Evaluation of ocular neuropathic pain.

作者信息

Le Damien Tuan-Man, Kandel Himal, Watson Stephanie L

机构信息

The University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia; Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.

The University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia; Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.

出版信息

Ocul Surf. 2023 Oct;30:213-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.09.009. Epub 2023 Sep 23.

Abstract

AIM

To identify and assess the quality of current validated questionnaires that could be used to evaluate ocular neuropathic pain and its associated aetiologies.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library. Articles evaluating questionnaires for ocular neuropathic pain and its associated aetiologies were included. Data on psychometric properties, validity, and reliability of the questionnaires was extracted and analysed using a set of quality criteria. Clinical and demographical associations with ocular neuropathic pain were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The search generated 1738 results with 61 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. The 61 publications covered 28 questionnaires including 3 ocular pain, 12 dry eye disease, 2 blepharitis, 2 refractive surgery, 3 contact lens wear, 3 Sjogren's Syndrome, and 3 that were non-disease-specific. Only 57 publications provided enough data on psychometric properties and validity of the questionnaire to be included for quality assessment. The Contact Lens Discomfort Index (CLDI) had the highest rated psychometric properties, whereas the English version of the Ocular Comfort Index (OCI) provided the most data on psychometric properties (9 out of 10 criteria). Most ocular pain and disease-specific questionnaires contained appropriate items to assess ocular pain in specific populations. However, non-disease-specific ophthalmic questionnaires demonstrated poor reliability and validity when evaluating ocular pain.

CONCLUSION

Ocular pain questionnaires can potentially diagnose ocular neuropathic pain. Disease-specific questionnaires were limited to their target populations, and non-disease-specific ophthalmic questionnaires were unreliable. Further studies are required to determine the most appropriate questionnaire to evaluate ocular neuropathic pain.

摘要

目的

识别并评估当前可用于评估眼部神经性疼痛及其相关病因的经过验证的问卷质量。

方法

在MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆进行文献检索。纳入评估眼部神经性疼痛及其相关病因问卷的文章。使用一套质量标准提取并分析问卷的心理测量特性、有效性和可靠性数据。还回顾了与眼部神经性疼痛相关的临床和人口统计学关联。

结果

检索产生了1738条结果,61篇出版物符合纳入标准。这61篇出版物涵盖了28份问卷,包括3份眼部疼痛问卷、12份干眼疾病问卷、2份睑缘炎问卷、2份屈光手术问卷、3份隐形眼镜佩戴问卷、3份干燥综合征问卷以及3份非疾病特异性问卷。只有57篇出版物提供了足够的问卷心理测量特性和有效性数据以纳入质量评估。隐形眼镜不适指数(CLDI)的心理测量特性评分最高,而眼部舒适度指数(OCI)英文版提供的心理测量特性数据最多(10项标准中的9项)。大多数眼部疼痛和疾病特异性问卷包含评估特定人群眼部疼痛的适当项目。然而,非疾病特异性眼科问卷在评估眼部疼痛时显示出较差的信度和效度。

结论

眼部疼痛问卷有可能诊断眼部神经性疼痛。疾病特异性问卷局限于其目标人群,而非疾病特异性眼科问卷不可靠。需要进一步研究以确定评估眼部神经性疼痛最合适的问卷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验