Suppr超能文献

多试验、聚合、个体参与者数据对双相 II 型重性抑郁发作的短期抗抑郁药与心境稳定剂单药治疗的荟萃分析。

Multi-trial, aggregated, individual participant data mega-analysis of short-term antidepressant versus mood stabilizer monotherapy of bipolar type II major depressive episode.

机构信息

Depression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2024 May;26(3):255-264. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13378. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have systematically examined the safety and effectiveness of antidepressant versus mood stabilizer monotherapy of bipolar II depression. To date, there are no aggregated or mega-analyses of prospective trials of individual participant-level data (IPD) to inform future treatment guidelines on the relative safety and effectiveness of antidepressant or lithium monotherapy.

METHODS

Data from a series of four independent, similarly designed trials of antidepressant or lithium monotherapy (where longitudinal IPD were available) (n = 393) were aggregated into an IPD dataset (i.e., mega-analysis). Hierarchical log-linear growth models were used to analyze primary outcome of change over time in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) scores; while secondary outcomes examined Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI/S) and change (CGI/C) scores, and change over time in Young Mania Rating (YMR) scores.

RESULTS

Relative to lithium monotherapy, antidepressant monotherapy demonstrated significantly greater symptom reduction on HRSD scores across time (b = -2.33, t = -6.68, p < 0.0001), significantly greater symptom reduction on the CGI/S across time (b = -0.414, t = -6.32, p < 0.001), and a significant improvement in CGI/C across time (b = -0.47, t = -7.43, p < 0.0001). No differences were observed in change over time for YMR scores between antidepressant and lithium monotherapy (b = 0.06, t = 0.49, p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

Findings from this IPD mega-analysis of bipolar II depression trials suggest a divergence from current evidence-based guidelines recommending combined mood stabilizer plus antidepressant therapy. The current mega-analysis suggests that antidepressant monotherapy may provide superior short-term effectiveness without clinically meaningful increase in treatment-emergent hypomanic symptoms compared to lithium monotherapy.

摘要

背景

鲜有研究系统地评估了抗抑郁药与心境稳定剂单药治疗双相情感障碍 II 型抑郁的安全性和有效性。迄今为止,尚无关于个体参与者水平数据(IPD)的前瞻性试验的汇总或大型分析,无法为未来的治疗指南提供关于抗抑郁药或锂单药治疗相对安全性和有效性的信息。

方法

将一系列四项独立、设计相似的抗抑郁药或锂单药治疗(有纵向 IPD 可用)的试验数据(n=393)汇总到一个 IPD 数据集(即大型分析)中。使用分层对数线性增长模型分析汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD)评分随时间变化的主要结局;同时,次要结局包括临床总体印象严重程度(CGI/S)和变化(CGI/C)评分,以及 Young Mania Rating(YMR)评分随时间的变化。

结果

与锂单药治疗相比,抗抑郁药单药治疗在 HRSD 评分上随时间的变化显示出显著更大的症状缓解(b=-2.33,t=-6.68,p<0.0001),在 CGI/S 上随时间的变化显示出显著更大的症状缓解(b=-0.414,t=-6.32,p<0.001),以及在 CGI/C 上随时间的变化显示出显著的改善(b=-0.47,t=-7.43,p<0.0001)。在 YMR 评分随时间的变化方面,抗抑郁药和锂单药治疗之间没有差异(b=0.06,t=0.49,p=0.62)。

结论

这项针对双相情感障碍 II 型抑郁试验的 IPD 大型分析的结果表明,与目前推荐联合心境稳定剂和抗抑郁药治疗的循证指南存在分歧。目前的大型分析表明,与锂单药治疗相比,抗抑郁药单药治疗可能提供更好的短期疗效,而不会导致治疗后出现明显的轻躁狂症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验