Suppr超能文献

文拉法辛与锂盐单药治疗双相II型重度抑郁发作的短期比较:一项随机开放标签研究。

Comparison of short-term venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy for bipolar II major depressive episode: a randomized open-label study.

作者信息

Amsterdam Jay D, Shults Justine

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Depression Research Unit, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3309, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;28(2):171-81. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318166c4e6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Practice guidelines for the initial treatment of bipolar II (BP II) major depressive episode (MDE) recommend mood stabilizer (MS) monotherapy or combined MS plus antidepressant drug (AD) therapy. We hypothesized that initial AD monotherapy would be superior to MS monotherapy for BP II MDE with a low hypomanic switch rate.

METHODS

Bipolar II MDE patients were randomized to a 12-week open-label treatment with either venlafaxine monotherapy (n = 43) or lithium carbonate monotherapy (n = 40). The primary outcome measure was the 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D 28). The secondary outcome measures included the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), clinical global impressions severity and change ratings, and the proportion of patients classified as responder (with > or = 50% reduction in baseline HAM-D score) or as remitter (final HAM-D score, < or = 8).

RESULTS

Thirty-four venlafaxine-treated patients (79.1%) and 15 lithium-treated patients (37.5%) completed the trial (P < 0.0005). Venlafaxine monotherapy produced a greater reduction in HAM-D 28 scores, with a difference in change of -6.57 points (95% confidence interval, -11.97 to -1.18) (P = 0.017) between treatment conditions. There was a greater proportion of venlafaxine-treated (vs lithium-treated) patients classified either as treatment responder (58.1% vs 20.0%; P < 0.0005) or as treatment remitter (44.2% vs 7.5%; P < 0.0005) for the HAM-D 28 scores. There was no significant increase in mean YMRS scores over time in the venlafaxine (vs lithium) treatment condition, and no significant increase in mean YMRS scores at any study visit compared with baseline for either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study suggest that AD monotherapy with venlafaxine may be an effective initial therapy for BP II MDE with a low hypomanic switch rate.

摘要

目的

双相II型障碍(BP II)重度抑郁发作(MDE)的初始治疗实践指南推荐使用心境稳定剂(MS)单药治疗或MS联合抗抑郁药(AD)治疗。我们假设,对于低轻躁狂转换率的BP II MDE,初始AD单药治疗优于MS单药治疗。

方法

BP II MDE患者被随机分配接受为期12周的开放标签治疗,其中一组接受文拉法辛单药治疗(n = 43),另一组接受碳酸锂单药治疗(n = 40)。主要结局指标为28项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D 28)。次要结局指标包括杨氏躁狂量表(YMRS)、临床总体印象严重程度和变化评分,以及被分类为治疗反应者(基线HAM-D评分降低≥50%)或缓解者(最终HAM-D评分≤8)的患者比例。

结果

34例接受文拉法辛治疗的患者(79.1%)和15例接受锂盐治疗的患者(37.5%)完成了试验(P < 0.0005)。文拉法辛单药治疗使HAM-D 28评分降低幅度更大,治疗组间变化差异为-6.57分(95%置信区间,-11.97至-1.18)(P = 0.017)。对于HAM-D 28评分,接受文拉法辛治疗的患者中被分类为治疗反应者(58.1%对20.0%;P < 0.0005)或治疗缓解者(44.2%对7.5%;P < 0.0005)的比例更高。在文拉法辛(与锂盐相比)治疗组中,平均YMRS评分随时间没有显著增加,与基线相比,任何研究访视时两种治疗的平均YMRS评分均无显著增加。

结论

本研究结果表明,文拉法辛AD单药治疗可能是低轻躁狂转换率的BP II MDE的一种有效初始治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验