• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过跨部门伙伴关系推动一致性和系统变革:来自加利福尼亚州负责健康社区倡议的调查结果。

Catalyzing alignment and systems transformation through cross-sector partnerships: Findings from the California Accountable Communities for Health Initiative.

机构信息

Providence Center for Outcomes Research and Education (CORE), Portland, Oregon, USA.

AGD Consulting, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14236. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14236. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14236
PMID:37749901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10796288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the impact of Accountable Communities of Health (ACHs) on organizational and community partnerships and explore how ACHs contribute to systems change.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

The California Accountable Communities of Health Initiative (CACHI) was a 5-year, $17 M investment in community health transformation in 13 ACH sites. Data sources include two surveys, key informant interviews, small group conversations, and ACH meeting observations and document review.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a mixed-methods, observational study. Surveys conducted in 2021 and 2022 focused on ACH progress in building organizational and community partnerships and ACH impact on partners and systems, respectively. Interviews and small group conversations were conducted toward the end of the CACHI grant period and designed to complement the surveys.

DATA COLLECTION

Survey respondents included ACH backbone agency staff and partner organization representatives (n = 141 in 2021 and 88 in 2022). Semistructured individual interviews and group conversations were conducted with 40 ACH backbone staff and partners. Documents were collected via grant reporting and directly from ACH staff. Data were analyzed descriptively and thematically.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

ACHs appear to have supported organizational partnerships and collaboration. Seventy-six percent of survey respondents reported that their ACH had strengthened organizations' ability to work together and 65% reported developing new or deepened connections. While ACH participants reported a better understanding of community needs and priorities, progress on community relationships, and greater attention to equity and racial justice, many saw room for improvement on meaningful community engagement. Systems changes and precursors of systems change observed across ACH sites included strengthened partnerships, enhanced knowledge, increased capacity, more collaborative ways of working, and new funding streams.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACH model is effective at strengthening organizational partnerships and catalyzing other systems changes and precursors including enhanced knowledge, increased capacity, more collaborative ways of working, and new funding.

摘要

目的

描述健康责任社区 (ACHs) 对组织和社区伙伴关系的影响,并探讨 ACHs 如何促进系统变革。

数据来源和研究设置

加利福尼亚健康责任社区倡议 (CACHI) 是一项为期 5 年、投资 1700 万美元的社区健康转型计划,在 13 个 ACH 地点实施。数据来源包括两项调查、关键知情人访谈、小组讨论、ACH 会议观察和文件审查。

研究设计

这是一项混合方法、观察性研究。2021 年和 2022 年进行的两项调查分别侧重于 ACH 在建立组织和社区伙伴关系方面的进展,以及 ACH 对合作伙伴和系统的影响。访谈和小组讨论在 CACHI 拨款期结束时进行,旨在补充调查。

数据收集

调查的受访者包括 ACH 骨干机构工作人员和合作伙伴组织代表(2021 年有 141 人,2022 年有 88 人)。对 40 名 ACH 骨干工作人员和合作伙伴进行了半结构化的个人访谈和小组讨论。通过拨款报告和直接从 ACH 工作人员那里收集文件。对数据进行了描述性和主题分析。

主要发现

ACH 似乎支持了组织伙伴关系和合作。76%的调查受访者表示,他们的 ACH 增强了组织共同工作的能力,65%的受访者表示开发了新的或深化了联系。虽然 ACH 参与者报告说对社区需求和优先事项有了更好的了解,并更加关注公平和种族正义,但许多人认为在有意义的社区参与方面还有改进的空间。ACH 站点观察到的系统变化和系统变化的前兆包括加强了伙伴关系、增强了知识、提高了能力、更多的合作工作方式和新的资金来源。

结论

ACH 模式在加强组织伙伴关系和促进其他系统变革和前兆方面是有效的,包括增强知识、提高能力、更多的合作工作方式和新的资金来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dca/10796288/972f0aa0b14c/HESR-59-e14236-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dca/10796288/972f0aa0b14c/HESR-59-e14236-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dca/10796288/972f0aa0b14c/HESR-59-e14236-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Catalyzing alignment and systems transformation through cross-sector partnerships: Findings from the California Accountable Communities for Health Initiative.通过跨部门伙伴关系推动一致性和系统变革:来自加利福尼亚州负责健康社区倡议的调查结果。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14236. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14236. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Exploring how health equity is addressed in accountable communities of/for health (ACHs).探讨在问责制社区卫生保健(ACH)中如何解决健康公平问题。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14258. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14258. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Financing The Infrastructure Of Accountable Communities For Health Is Key To Long-Term Sustainability.为健康责任社区的基础设施提供资金是长期可持续性的关键。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Apr;39(4):670-678. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01581.
4
Community Partnering for Behavioral Health Equity: Public Agency and Community Leaders' Views of its Promise and Challenge.社区合作促进行为健康公平:公共机构和社区领导者对其承诺和挑战的看法。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):397-406. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.397. eCollection 2018.
5
Applying network analysis to assess the development and sustainability of multi-sector coalitions.运用网络分析评估多部门联盟的发展和可持续性。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 18;17(10):e0276114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276114. eCollection 2022.
6
Financing community partnerships for health equity: Findings and insights from cross-sector professionals.为健康公平筹资建立社区伙伴关系:跨部门专业人员的发现和见解。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14237. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14237. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
7
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Developing co-funded multi-sectoral partnerships for chronic disease prevention: a qualitative inquiry into federal governmental public health staff experience.建立用于慢性病预防的多方共同资助的多部门伙伴关系:对联邦政府公共卫生工作人员经验的定性调查
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Aug 20;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00609-6.
9
Pursuing Research Justice Through Community-Academic Partnership to Address Racial Disparities in Preterm Birth.通过社区-学术伙伴关系追求研究公正,以解决早产中的种族差异问题。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(2):319-327. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.a900212.
10
Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative.强化公共卫生多部门伙伴关系的证据和行动:一项行动研究倡议。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Jun;36(6):101-11. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.6.01.

引用本文的文献

1
Be Well Baytown: Whole-Community Cancer Prevention Initiative Based on Multi-Sector Capacity and Partnership Building.贝敦健康计划:基于多部门能力和伙伴关系建设的全社区癌症预防倡议。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251347584. doi: 10.1177/10732748251347584. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Aiming for transformations in power: lessons from intersectoral CBPR with public housing tenants (Québec, Canada).旨在实现权力变革:公共住房租户的跨部门 CBPR 经验教训(加拿大魁北克)。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Aug 1;39(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae085.
3
The big picture for this special issue: The state of the field, article highlights, and a look into the future.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Collective Impact to Advance Birth Equity: A Comparison of Two Cross-Sector Efforts in California.利用集体影响力促进生育公平:加利福尼亚州两项跨部门举措的比较
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Dec;26(12):2517-2525. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03528-w. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
Accountable Communities of Health, Health and Social Service Systems Alignment, and Population Health: Eastern Washington State, 2017-2019.负责任的社区卫生组织、卫生和社会服务系统的协调以及人群健康:2017-2019 年,华盛顿州东部。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(S2):S235-S241. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305773.
3
Cross-Sector Partnerships for Systemic Change: Systematized Literature Review and Agenda for Further Research.
本期特刊的总体情况:该领域的现状、文章亮点以及对未来的展望。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14266. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14266. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
4
Exploring how health equity is addressed in accountable communities of/for health (ACHs).探讨在问责制社区卫生保健(ACH)中如何解决健康公平问题。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14258. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14258. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
促进系统性变革的跨部门伙伴关系:系统化文献综述与进一步研究议程
J Bus Ethics. 2018;150(2):303-313. doi: 10.1007/s10551-018-3922-2. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
4
What makes intersectoral partnerships for health promotion work? A review of the international literature.促进健康的跨部门伙伴关系为何奏效?国际文献综述。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Feb 1;33(1):4-26. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw061.
5
Patterns in PARTNERing across Public Health Collaboratives.公共卫生合作组织间合作的模式
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Oct 5;12(10):12412-25. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121012412.
6
A systematic review of collaboration and network research in the public affairs literature: implications for public health practice and research.系统回顾公共事务文献中的合作与网络研究:对公共卫生实践和研究的启示。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Mar;102(3):564-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300286. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
7
Putting the system back into systems change: a framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems.将系统重新纳入系统变革:一个理解和改变组织及社区系统的框架。
Am J Community Psychol. 2007 Jun;39(3-4):197-215. doi: 10.1007/s10464-007-9109-0.
8
What explains community coalition effectiveness?: a review of the literature.如何解释社区联盟的有效性?文献综述
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Apr;30(4):351-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.004.