• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立用于慢性病预防的多方共同资助的多部门伙伴关系:对联邦政府公共卫生工作人员经验的定性调查

Developing co-funded multi-sectoral partnerships for chronic disease prevention: a qualitative inquiry into federal governmental public health staff experience.

作者信息

Johnston Lee M, Goldsmith Laurie J, Finegood Diane T

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, Canada.

GoldQual Consulting, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Aug 20;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00609-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-020-00609-6
PMID:32819366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7439681/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multi-sectoral partnerships (MSPs) are frequently cited as a means by which governments can improve population health while leveraging the resources and expertise of the private and non-profit sectors. As part of their efforts in this area, the Public Health Agency of Canada (the Agency) introduced a novel funding programme requiring applicants to procure matched resources from private sources to support large-scale interventions for chronic disease prevention. The current literature on MSPs is limited in its applicability to this model of multi-sectoral engagement. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of Agency staff working with potential partners to develop programme applications, such that we might identify lessons from adopting this type of partnership approach.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the 12 staff working in the MSP programme. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Preliminary themes were used to inform follow up focus-groups sessions. A second round of analysis was conducted guided by a coding paradigm focused on understanding process.

RESULTS

We identified "experiencing uncertainty" to be a central concept in participants' accounts of the MSP process, related specifically to the MSP programme's novel conditions, shifts that occurred in sectoral roles and demands for new capacities. In response, Agency staff employed strategies to clarify partner interests, build trust in inter-sectoral relationships, and support internal and partner capacity. Outcomes associated with this process include impacts on trust between the Agency and potential partners, a deeper understanding of other sectors, and programme adaptations and refinements to address challenges related to the programme model.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-funding model employed by the Agency is a potentially popular one for government bodies wanting to leverage funding from private sector sources. Our study identifies the potential challenges that can occur under this model. Some challenges are related to addressing material conditions related to partner capacity, whereas other challenges speak to deeper and more difficult to address concerns regarding trust and alignment of motivations and interests between partners. Future research exploring the challenges associated with specific models of MSP engagement is necessary to inform approaches to addressing complex problems through collaborative efforts.

摘要

背景

多部门伙伴关系(MSPs)常被视为政府改善民众健康的一种方式,同时可利用私营和非营利部门的资源与专业知识。作为其在该领域努力的一部分,加拿大公共卫生署(该署)推出了一项新的资助计划,要求申请者从私人来源获取匹配资源,以支持大规模慢性病预防干预措施。当前关于多部门伙伴关系的文献在应用于这种多部门参与模式时存在局限性。本研究的目的是探索该署工作人员与潜在伙伴合作制定项目申请的经验,以便我们能从采用这种伙伴关系方法中吸取经验教训。

方法

对多部门伙伴关系项目的12名工作人员进行了半结构化访谈。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用主题分析法进行分析。初步主题用于指导后续焦点小组会议。第二轮分析在一个专注于理解过程的编码范式指导下进行。

结果

我们发现“经历不确定性”是参与者对多部门伙伴关系过程描述中的一个核心概念,具体与多部门伙伴关系项目的新条件、部门角色的转变以及对新能力的要求有关。作为回应,该署工作人员采取策略来明确伙伴的利益、建立部门间关系的信任以及支持内部和伙伴的能力。与这一过程相关的结果包括对该署与潜在伙伴之间信任的影响、对其他部门的更深入了解,以及为应对与项目模式相关的挑战而对项目进行的调整和完善。

结论

该署采用的共同资助模式对于希望利用私营部门资金的政府机构来说可能是一种受欢迎的模式。我们的研究确定了这种模式下可能出现的潜在挑战。一些挑战与解决与伙伴能力相关的物质条件有关,而其他挑战则涉及更深层次且更难解决的关于信任以及伙伴之间动机和利益一致性的问题。未来有必要开展研究,探索与特定多部门伙伴关系参与模式相关的挑战,以便为通过合作努力解决复杂问题的方法提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc21/7439681/c70944baa709/12961_2020_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc21/7439681/c70944baa709/12961_2020_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc21/7439681/c70944baa709/12961_2020_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing co-funded multi-sectoral partnerships for chronic disease prevention: a qualitative inquiry into federal governmental public health staff experience.建立用于慢性病预防的多方共同资助的多部门伙伴关系:对联邦政府公共卫生工作人员经验的定性调查
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Aug 20;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00609-6.
2
Exploring the unanticipated effects of multi-sectoral partnerships in chronic disease prevention.探索多部门伙伴关系在慢性病预防中的意外效果。
Health Policy. 2017 Feb;121(2):158-168. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.11.019. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative.强化公共卫生多部门伙伴关系的证据和行动:一项行动研究倡议。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Jun;36(6):101-11. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.6.01.
4
Co-building a training programme to facilitate patient, family and community partnership on research grants: A patient-oriented research project.合作共建培训项目,以促进患者、家庭和社区在研究资助方面的伙伴关系:一个以患者为中心的研究项目。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1584-1595. doi: 10.1111/hex.13763. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
5
Knowledge mobilisation for chronic disease prevention: the case of the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre.知识转化在慢性病预防中的应用:以澳大利亚预防伙伴关系中心为例。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 16;16(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0379-9.
6
Considerations of private sector obstetricians on participation in the state led "Chiranjeevi Yojana" scheme to promote institutional delivery in Gujarat, India: a qualitative study.印度古吉拉特邦私立部门产科医生对参与由国家主导的“奇兰吉维计划”以促进机构分娩的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Nov 5;14:352. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-352.
7
Public-non-governmental organisation partnerships for health: an exploratory study with case studies from recent Ghanaian experience.公共-非政府组织健康伙伴关系:基于加纳近期经验案例研究的探索性研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16(1):963. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3636-2.
8
Developing health systems research capacities through north-south partnership: an evaluation of collaboration with South Africa and Thailand.通过南北伙伴关系发展卫生系统研究能力:对与南非和泰国合作的评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Aug 1;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-8.
9
Balancing the benefits and risks of public-private partnerships to address the global double burden of malnutrition.平衡公私伙伴关系的利益和风险,以应对全球营养不良的双重负担。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Mar;15(3):503-17. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011002060. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
10
Wraparound programmes for pregnant and parenting women with substance use concerns in Canada: Partnerships are essential.加拿大针对有药物使用问题的孕妇和育有子女的女性的综合服务项目:伙伴关系至关重要。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e2264-e2276. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13664. Epub 2021 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Chronic Disease Management: Personalized Medicine Insights from Rural and Urban General Practitioner Practices.加强慢性病管理:来自农村和城市全科医生实践的个性化医疗见解。
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):706. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070706.
2
Evaluation of Community Involvement and Development in an Orthopedic Hospital.一家骨科医院的社区参与和发展评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;12(13):1286. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131286.
3
Barriers and Facilitators in the Implementation of Prevention Strategies for Chronic Disease Patients-Best Practice GuideLines and Policies' Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
It's hard to play ball: A qualitative study of knowledge exchange and silo effects in public health.开展工作困难重重:一项关于公共卫生领域知识交流与孤岛效应的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 2;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2770-6.
2
What makes intersectoral partnerships for health promotion work? A review of the international literature.促进健康的跨部门伙伴关系为何奏效?国际文献综述。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Feb 1;33(1):4-26. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw061.
3
Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative.
慢性病患者预防策略实施中的障碍与促进因素——最佳实践指南与政策的系统评价
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 4;13(2):288. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020288.
强化公共卫生多部门伙伴关系的证据和行动:一项行动研究倡议。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Jun;36(6):101-11. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.6.01.
4
Towards a simple typology of international health partnerships.迈向国际卫生伙伴关系的简单类型学。
Global Health. 2015 Dec 15;11:49. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0132-x.
5
Cross-sector partnerships and public health: challenges and opportunities for addressing obesity and noncommunicable diseases through engagement with the private sector.跨部门伙伴关系与公共卫生:通过与私营部门合作应对肥胖和非传染性疾病的挑战与机遇。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:255-71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122802. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
6
Multisector partnerships in population health improvement.多部门合作改善人口健康。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Nov;7(6):A119. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
7
Building multisectoral partnerships for population health and health equity.建立多部门伙伴关系以促进人口健康和健康公平。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Nov;7(6):A118. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
8
Learning from evidence in a complex world.从复杂世界中的证据中学习。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):505-14. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.066043. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
9
Local public health system partnerships.地方公共卫生系统伙伴关系。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Jan-Feb;120(1):76-83. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000113.
10
Whatever happened to qualitative description?定性描述怎么了?
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.