One anastomosis gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional bariatric surgery for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedure.

INTRODUCTION

Weight loss failure after restrictive bariatric procedures initiated the debate about the choice of an adequate revisional intervention, a question still unanswered. While many surgeons went for a conversion to gastric bypass, others opted for re-trying a revisional restrictive procedure to avoid the side effects of gastric bypass. The objective of our study was to compare weight loss outcome between revisional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (re-LSG) and revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (re-OAGB) for insufficient weight loss or weight regain following primary restrictive bariatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 20 obese patients, with a history of weight regain or insufficient weight loss after primary restrictive surgery, who underwent re-LSG (eight patients) or re-OAGB (12 patients) between January 2018 and January 2021. Patients were followed up 2 years after their revisional intervention. Statistics were performed using IBM® SPSS® software for Windows version 21.

RESULTS

In the re-LSG group, the average body mass index (BMI) before primary restrictive procedure was 43.7 kg/m . The average period between the primary and revisional surgery was 12.6 years. Patients had a nadir BMI of 33.2 kg/m during that period and reached a mean BMI of 40.6 kg/m before re-LSG. Two years after re-LSG, the average BMI was 31.5 kg/m with a percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) of 54% and percent of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) of 66.6%. In the re-OAGB group, the average BMI before primary restrictive procedure was 39 kg/m . The average period between the primary and revisional surgery was 10.7 years. Patients had a nadir BMI of 30.5 kg/m during that period and reached a mean BMI of 36.5 kg/m before re-OAGB. Two years after re-OAGB, the average BMI was 27 kg/m with a %EWL of 86.7% and %EBMIL of 92.6%.

CONCLUSION

For patients with insufficient weight loss or weight regain following primary restrictive bariatric surgery, re-OAGB has a better effectiveness in weight reduction compared with re-LSG after a 2-year follow up.