• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单吻合口胃旁路术用于限制性手术的翻修:中期结果和可能的结果预测因素分析。

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Mid-Term Outcomes and Analysis of Possible Outcome Predictors.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, 64230906, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Division of General Surgery, Bariatric Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated to Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2022 Oct;32(10):3264-3271. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06235-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-022-06235-1
PMID:35953635
Abstract

PURPOSE

Revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) for insufficient weight reduction following primary restrictive procedures is still investigated. We report mid-term outcomes and possible outcome predictors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center retrospective comparative study of revisional OAGB outcomes (2015-2018) following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG); silastic ring vertical gastroplasty (SRVG) is separately discussed.

RESULTS

In all, 203 patients underwent revisional OAGB following LAGB (n = 125), SG (n = 64), and SRVG (n = 14). Comparing LAGB and SG, body mass index (BMI) at revision were 41.3 ± 6.6 and 42 ± 11.2 kg/m (p = 0.64), reduced to 31.3 ± 8.3 and 31.9 ± 8.3 (p = 0.64) at mid-term follow-up, respectively. Excess weight loss (EWL) > 50% was achieved in ~ 50%, with EWL of 79.4 ± 20.4% (corresponding total weight loss 38.5 ± 10.4%). SRVG patients had comparable outcomes. Resolution rates of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (HTN) were 93.3% and 84.6% in LAGB compared with 100% and 100% in SG patients (p = 0.47 and p = 0.46), respectively. In univariable analysis, EWL > 50% was associated with male gender (p < 0.001), higher weight (p < 0.001), and BMI (p = 0.007) at primary surgery, and higher BMI at revisional OAGB (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors for EWL > 50% were male gender (OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.27-6.18; p = 0.01) and higher BMI at revisional OAGB (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Revisional OAGB for insufficient restrictive procedures results in excellent weight reduction in nearly 50% of patients, with resolution of T2D and HTN at mid-term follow-up. Male gender and higher BMI at revision were associated with EWL > 50% following revisional OAGB. Identification of more predictors could aid judicious patient selection.

摘要

目的

对于初次施行限制型手术之后减重效果不理想的患者,可进行再次吻合胃旁路手术(one anastomosis gastric bypass,OAGB)。我们报告了中期结果和可能的结果预测因素。

材料与方法

这是一项单中心回顾性对比研究,比较了腹腔镜可调节胃束带术(laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding,LAGB)和袖状胃切除术(sleeve gastrectomy,SG)之后行再次吻合胃旁路手术(revisional OAGB)的结果,同时单独讨论了硅酮环垂直胃成形术(silastic ring vertical gastroplasty,SRVG)。

结果

共有 203 例患者因初次施行 LAGB(n = 125)、SG(n = 64)或 SRVG(n = 14)之后减重效果不理想而接受了再次吻合胃旁路手术。LAGB 和 SG 组患者的体重指数(body mass index,BMI)在初次手术时分别为 41.3 ± 6.6 和 42 ± 11.2 kg/m²(p = 0.64),在中期随访时分别降至 31.3 ± 8.3 和 31.9 ± 8.3(p = 0.64)。再次吻合胃旁路手术后,大约 50%的患者达到了 excess weight loss(EWL)> 50%,EWL 为 79.4 ± 20.4%(相应的总体减重为 38.5 ± 10.4%)。SRVG 组患者的结果也具有可比性。与 SG 组患者相比,LAGB 组患者的 2 型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes,T2D)和高血压(hypertension,HTN)的缓解率分别为 93.3%和 84.6%(p = 0.47 和 p = 0.46)。在单变量分析中,EWL> 50%与男性(p < 0.001)、更高的体重(p < 0.001)和初次手术时的 BMI(p = 0.007)相关,与再次吻合胃旁路手术时的 BMI(p < 0.001)相关。在多变量分析中,EWL> 50%的独立预测因素为男性(odds ratio,OR = 2.8,95% confidence interval,CI 1.27-6.18;p = 0.01)和再次吻合胃旁路手术时更高的 BMI(OR = 1.11,95% CI 1.03-1.19;p = 0.006)。

结论

对于初次施行限制型手术之后减重效果不理想的患者,再次吻合胃旁路手术可获得极好的减重效果,大约 50%的患者达到了 EWL> 50%,并可在中期随访时缓解 2 型糖尿病和高血压。男性和再次吻合胃旁路手术时更高的 BMI 与再次吻合胃旁路手术后 EWL> 50%相关。进一步识别更多的预测因素可能有助于进行明智的患者选择。

相似文献

1
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Revision of Restrictive Procedures: Mid-Term Outcomes and Analysis of Possible Outcome Predictors.单吻合口胃旁路术用于限制性手术的翻修:中期结果和可能的结果预测因素分析。
Obes Surg. 2022 Oct;32(10):3264-3271. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06235-1. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional bariatric surgery for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedure.一种吻合口胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为初次限制手术减肥失败后的减重修复术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13248. doi: 10.1111/ases.13248. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
3
Comparison of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy for Revision of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: 5-Year Outcomes.胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术治疗腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败的比较:5 年结果。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jun;33(6):1782-1789. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06588-1. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
4
One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as revisional bariatric surgery after failed primary adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG): A systematic review of 1075 patients.一次吻合/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)作为初次可调胃束带术(LAGB)和袖状胃切除术(SG)失败后的减肥手术:1075 例患者的系统回顾。
Int J Surg. 2020 Sep;81:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb After Failure of Adjustable Gastric Banding: Mid-Term Outcomes and Comparison Between One- and Two-Stage Approaches.可调胃束带失败后行 150cm 胆胰支胃旁路术再次吻合:中期结果和单阶段与双阶段方法比较。
Obes Surg. 2021 Dec;31(12):5330-5341. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05728-9. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
6
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis-mini gastric bypass as a rescue procedure following failed restrictive bariatric surgery. A systematic review of literature with metanalysis.胃旁路术与单吻合口迷你胃旁路术治疗肥胖症减重手术后失败的挽救性治疗:系统综述和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Apr;73(2):639-647. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00938-9. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
Comparative analysis of 5-year efficacy and outcomes of single anastomosis procedures as revisional surgery for weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy.单吻合口手术作为胃旁路术后体重反弹的翻修手术的 5 年疗效和结局的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7548-7555. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10234-3. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
8
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Elderly Patients: Safety and Long-term Outcomes.老年患者中,单吻合口胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的比较:安全性及长期疗效
Obes Surg. 2023 Feb;33(2):570-576. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06421-1. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
9
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗限制型减重手术后减重不足和体重反弹
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3287-3294. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04536-x.
10
Efficiency of Laparoscopic One-Step Revision of Failed Adjusted Gastric Banding to Gastric Sleeve: a Retrospective Review of 101 Consecutive Patients.腹腔镜下调整胃束带术失败后改为袖状胃切除术的效率:101 例连续患者的回顾性研究。
Obes Surg. 2019 Dec;29(12):3868-3873. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04061-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisional Surgery Due to Weight Regain or Insufficient Weight Loss Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.因单吻合口胃旁路术后体重反弹或减重不足而进行的翻修手术。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 29;16(11):e74799. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74799. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Medium and Long-Term Weight Loss After Revisional Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.修正性减重手术后的中长期减重效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1917-1928. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07206-4. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Weight Regain Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Etiology and Surgical Treatment.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后体重反弹:病因及手术治疗
Isr Med Assoc J. 2019 Dec;21(12):823-828.
胃旁路吻合术作为袖状胃切除术后的翻修术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Feb;34(2):429-441. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07056-0. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
The Effect of Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Compared with Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Symptoms and Quality of Life Outcomes.袖状胃切除术后再次行胃旁路术(单吻合口胃旁路术)与再次行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗胃食管反流病的效果对比:症状和生活质量结局。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2125-2131. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06636-w. Epub 2023 May 11.