Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 26;18(9):e0283145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283145. eCollection 2023.
Pelvic exams are frequently complicated by collapse of the lateral vaginal walls, obstructing the view of the cervix. To overcome this, physicians frequently repurpose a glove or a condom as a sheath placed over the speculum blades to retract the lateral vaginal walls. Despite their regular use in clinical practice, little research has been done comparing the relative efficacy of these methods. Better visualization of the cervix can benefit patients by decreasing examination-related discomfort, improving cancer screening accuracy, and preventing the need to move the examination to the operating room under general anesthesia. This study presents a physical model that simulates vaginal pressure being exerted around a speculum. Using it, we conduct controlled experiments comparing the efficacy of different condom types, glove materials, glove sizes, and techniques to place gloves on the speculum. The results show that the best sheath is the middle finger of nitrile-material gloves. They provide adequate lateral wall retraction without significantly restricting the opening of the speculum. In comparison, condoms provide a smaller amount of retraction due to loosely fitting the speculum. They may still be a reasonable option for a different speculum size. However, vinyl-material gloves are an impractical option for sheaths; they greatly restrict speculum opening, occasionally even breaking the speculum, which overcome its retraction benefits. Glove size, condom brand, and condom material (latex vs polyisoprene) had minimal impact. This study serves as a guide for clinicians as they use easily accessible tools to perform difficult pelvic exams. We recommend that physicians consider nitrile gloves as the preferred option for a sheath around a speculum. Additionally, this study demonstrates proof-of-concept of a physical model that quantitatively describes different materials on their ability to improve cervical access. This model can be used in future research with more speculum and material combinations, including with materials custom-designed for vaginal retraction.
盆腔检查常常因外侧阴道壁塌陷而变得复杂,从而阻碍了对宫颈的观察。为了克服这个问题,医生通常会将手套或避孕套重新用作护套,放置在窥镜刀片上,以牵拉外侧阴道壁。尽管它们在临床实践中经常使用,但很少有研究比较这些方法的相对效果。更好地观察宫颈可以通过减少与检查相关的不适、提高癌症筛查的准确性以及防止需要在全身麻醉下将检查转移到手术室来使患者受益。本研究提出了一种物理模型,模拟阴道压力围绕窥镜施加的情况。使用该模型,我们进行了对照实验,比较了不同类型的避孕套、手套材料、手套尺寸和将手套放在窥镜上的技术的效果。结果表明,最好的护套是丁腈手套的中指。它们提供了足够的侧壁回缩,而不会显著限制窥镜的开口。相比之下,避孕套由于与窥镜配合不紧密,提供的回缩量较小。对于不同的窥镜尺寸,它们可能仍然是一个合理的选择。然而,对于护套来说,乙烯基材料的手套是不切实际的选择;它们极大地限制了窥镜的开口,偶尔甚至会使窥镜破裂,从而克服了其回缩的好处。手套尺寸、避孕套品牌和避孕套材料(乳胶与聚异戊二烯)的影响最小。本研究为临床医生提供了指南,帮助他们使用易于获得的工具进行困难的盆腔检查。我们建议医生考虑将丁腈手套作为首选护套,用于环绕窥镜。此外,本研究证明了物理模型的概念验证,该模型可定量描述不同材料在改善宫颈通道方面的能力。该模型可以在未来的研究中与更多的窥镜和材料组合一起使用,包括为阴道回缩定制的材料。