• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉和股动脉入路行脑血管造影术:一项回顾性对比研究。

Transradial and transfemoral accesses for cerebral angiography: a retrospective comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Nantong Third People's Hospital, Nantong, China.

Department of Stroke Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.

出版信息

Neurol Res. 2023 Dec;45(12):1063-1068. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2023.2257410. Epub 2023 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1080/01616412.2023.2257410
PMID:37751776
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many large randomized trials in interventional cardiology have shown a significant advantage of transradial access (TRA) over transfemoral access (TFA). However, TRA has yet been widely used in Neurovascular interventional surgery. The purpose of this retrospective comparative study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of transradial and transfemoral accesses for cerebral angiography.

METHODS

A total of 380 patients underwent cerebral angiography in our center between January 2019 and January 2021. Among them, 192 patients underwent TRA, and 188 patients via TFA. The success rate of cerebral angiography, X-ray time, total absorbed dose, dose-area product (DAP), complications, and other clinical data were extracted.

RESULTS

The operative success (94.27% vs 97.87%;  = 0.071) and the puncture failure (1.56% vs 1.60%) were not significantly different between the TRA and TFA groups. Only arterial spasm, which is more common in the TRA group, was substantially different between the two groups in terms of surgical consequences ( = 0.015). In addition, there were no significant differences between the groups in total absorbed dose ( = 0.604) and DAP( = 0.097). However, the X-ray time of the TRA group [281.50(216.30,342.00)] was shorter than the TFA group [296.50(230.80,363.50)] ( = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

TRA is effective and safe in cerebral angiography, and its use may be expanded.

摘要

目的

许多介入心脏病学的大型随机试验表明,经桡动脉入路(TRA)优于经股动脉入路(TFA)。然而,TRA 在神经血管介入手术中尚未广泛应用。本回顾性对比研究的目的是比较经桡动脉和经股动脉入路行脑血管造影的有效性和安全性。

方法

本研究共纳入 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月在我院行脑血管造影的 380 例患者。其中 192 例行 TRA,188 例行 TFA。提取脑血管造影成功率、X 线时间、总吸收剂量、剂量面积乘积(DAP)、并发症等临床资料。

结果

TRA 组和 TFA 组的手术成功率(94.27%比 97.87%; = 0.071)和穿刺失败率(1.56%比 1.60%)差异无统计学意义。TRA 组仅动脉痉挛的手术后果明显不同于 TFA 组( = 0.015)。此外,两组的总吸收剂量( = 0.604)和 DAP( = 0.097)差异无统计学意义。然而,TRA 组的 X 线时间[281.50(216.30,342.00)]短于 TFA 组[296.50(230.80,363.50)]( = 0.019)。

结论

TRA 在脑血管造影中是有效且安全的,其应用可能会扩大。

相似文献

1
Transradial and transfemoral accesses for cerebral angiography: a retrospective comparative study.经桡动脉和股动脉入路行脑血管造影术:一项回顾性对比研究。
Neurol Res. 2023 Dec;45(12):1063-1068. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2023.2257410. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
2
Comparison of Transfemoral Cerebral Angiography and Transradial Cerebral Angiography Following a Shift in Practice During Four Years at a Single Center in China.在中国一家单中心四年的实践转变后,经股动脉与经桡动脉入路行全脑血管造影的比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 25;26:e921631. doi: 10.12659/MSM.921631.
3
Comparison of Transradial Access and Transfemoral Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography in the Elderly Population.老年人群诊断性脑血管造影经桡动脉通路与经股动脉通路的比较
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;181:e411-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.071. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
A reality check in transradial access: a single-centre comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for abdominal and peripheral intervention.经桡动脉入路的现实情况检查:经桡动脉与经股动脉入路用于腹部和外周介入的单中心比较。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5580-2. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Intraoperative Cerebral Angiography for Open Cerebrovascular Surgery: Effectiveness, Safety, and Learning Curve.经桡动脉与经股动脉术中脑血管造影在开颅脑血管手术中的应用:有效性、安全性和学习曲线。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023 May 1;24(5):476-482. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000567. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
6
A Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Comparison of the Transradial vs Transfemoral Approach for Cerebral Angiography: A Learning Curve Analysis.单中心、随机、对照研究经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行脑血管造影的对比:学习曲线分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Oct;26(5):717-724. doi: 10.1177/1526602819859285. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
7
Transradial access for cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: A meta-analysis and systematic review.经桡动脉入路行脑血管造影和神经介入治疗:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun;30(3):404-411. doi: 10.1177/15910199221112200. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Four French sheath-based transradial cerebral angiographies in the elderly: A single neurointerventionalist's experience.老年患者的四次基于法国鞘管的经桡动脉脑血管造影:一位神经介入专家的经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;29(3):229-234. doi: 10.1177/15910199221083102. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
Transradial approach for diagnostic cerebral angiograms in the elderly: a comparative observational study.经桡动脉入路在老年患者诊断性全脑血管造影中的应用:一项对比观察性研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Dec;12(12):1235-1241. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016140. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
Transradial versus transfemoral arterial approach for cerebral angiography and the frequency of embolic events on diffusion weighted MRI.经桡动脉与经股动脉入路行脑血管造影及磁共振弥散加权成像显示栓塞事件的频率比较。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):723-727. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019009. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Transradial versus transfemoral access in diagnostic cerebral angiography: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and complications.诊断性脑血管造影中经桡动脉与经股动脉入路:临床结局和并发症的全面系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuroradiology. 2025 Mar 29. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03581-6.
2
Comprehensive Analysis of Neurologic Complications following Transradial Cerebral Angiography.经桡动脉脑血管造影术后神经并发症的综合分析
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 3;46(6):1166-1172. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8625.