• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善成人住院病房的护理评估:一项二次分析

Improving Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units: A Secondary Analysis.

作者信息

Llagostera-Reverter Irene, Luna-Aleixos David, Valero-Chillerón María Jesús, Martínez-Gonzálbez Rafael, Mecho-Montoliu Gema, González-Chordá Víctor M

机构信息

Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain.

Hospital Universitario de La Plana, Vila-Real, 12520 Castellón, Spain.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2023 Aug 23;13(3):1148-1159. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13030099.

DOI:10.3390/nursrep13030099
PMID:37755342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10536114/
Abstract

The main objective of this study was to analyze the impact of a multifaceted strategy to improve the assessment of functional capacity, risk of pressure injuries, and risk of falls at the time of admission of patients in adult hospitalization units. This was a secondary analysis of the VALENF project databases during two periods (October-December 2020, before the strategy, and October-December 2021, after the strategy). The quantity and quality of nursing assessments performed on patients admitted to adult hospitalization units were evaluated using the Barthel index, Braden index, and Downton scale. The number of assessments completed before the implementation of the new strategy was = 686 (28.01%), versus = 1445 (58.73%) in 2021 ( < 0.001). The strategy improved the completion of the evaluations of the three instruments from 63.4% ( = 435) to 71.8% ( = 1038) ( < 0.001). There were significant differences depending on the hospitalization unit and the assessment instrument ( < 0.05). The strategy employed was, therefore, successful. The nursing assessments show a substantial improvement in both quantity and quality, representing a noticeable improvement in nursing practice. This study was not registered.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是分析一项多方面策略对改善成年住院病房患者入院时功能能力评估、压疮风险评估和跌倒风险评估的影响。这是对VALENF项目数据库在两个时期(2020年10月至12月,策略实施前;2021年10月至12月,策略实施后)的二次分析。使用巴氏指数、布拉登指数和唐顿量表对成年住院病房患者进行的护理评估的数量和质量进行了评估。新策略实施前完成的评估数量为 = 686(28.01%),而2021年为 = 1445(58.73%)(<0.001)。该策略将三种评估工具的评估完成率从63.4%( = 435)提高到了71.8%( = 1038)(<0.001)。根据住院病房和评估工具的不同存在显著差异(<0.05)。因此,所采用的策略是成功的。护理评估在数量和质量上都有显著改善,这代表了护理实践的明显进步。本研究未进行注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73a/10536114/dc5e10770262/nursrep-13-00099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73a/10536114/dc5e10770262/nursrep-13-00099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73a/10536114/dc5e10770262/nursrep-13-00099-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units: A Secondary Analysis.改善成人住院病房的护理评估:一项二次分析
Nurs Rep. 2023 Aug 23;13(3):1148-1159. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13030099.
2
Diagnostic accuracy study of the VALENF instrument in hospitalization units for adults: a study protocol.VALENF仪器在成人住院科室中的诊断准确性研究:一项研究方案。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 27;22(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01567-4.
3
Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part I).成人住院病房护理评估元工具(VALENF 工具)的开发和验证(第一部分)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;19(22):14622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214622.
4
Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for the Assessment of Functional Capacity, the Risk of Falls and Pressure Injuries in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part II).成人住院单位功能能力、跌倒风险和压力性损伤评估元工具的开发和验证(VALENF 工具)(第二部分)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 12;20(6):5003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065003.
5
Developing and validating an integrated instrument for nursing assessments in adult hospitalization units: Study protocol.成人住院病房护理评估综合工具的开发与验证:研究方案。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):4093-4100. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1602. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
6
Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients.压疮风险评估:葡萄牙成年住院患者Braden量表评分的回顾性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov;24(21-22):3165-76. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12927. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
7
Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study.STRATIFY和唐顿工具对评估住院急性护理患者跌倒风险的诊断有效性:一项多中心纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2214-3.
8
Accurate falls risk assessment and interventions for preventing falls in patients in the acute care setting within a private hospital in a large capital city: a best practice implementation project.在一个大城市的一家私立医院的急性护理环境中,对患者进行准确的跌倒风险评估及预防跌倒的干预措施:一个最佳实践实施项目。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep;13(9):386-406. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2089.
9
Auditing completion of nursing records as an outcome indicator for identifying patients at risk of developing pressure ulcers, falling, and social vulnerability: An observational study.审核护理记录的完成情况作为识别有发生压疮、跌倒和社会脆弱性风险的患者的结局指标:一项观察性研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 May;30(4):1061-1068. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13569. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
10
Implementation of the Best practice guideline: Stroke assessment across the continuum of care in hospitalised patients.最佳实践指南的实施:住院患者连续护理过程中的卒中评估
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2020 May-Jun;30(3):160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.10.026. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimized Continuity of Care Report on Nursing Compliance and Review: A Retrospective Study.护理合规性与审查的优化连续性护理报告:一项回顾性研究。
Nurs Rep. 2024 Aug 23;14(3):2095-2106. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14030156.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for the Assessment of Functional Capacity, the Risk of Falls and Pressure Injuries in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part II).成人住院单位功能能力、跌倒风险和压力性损伤评估元工具的开发和验证(VALENF 工具)(第二部分)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 12;20(6):5003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065003.
2
Developing and validating an integrated instrument for nursing assessments in adult hospitalization units: Study protocol.成人住院病房护理评估综合工具的开发与验证:研究方案。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):4093-4100. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1602. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part I).
成人住院病房护理评估元工具(VALENF 工具)的开发和验证(第一部分)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;19(22):14622. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214622.
4
Nursing-sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997-2017).护理敏感指标在护理中的应用:系统评价(1997-2017 年)。
Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1005-1022. doi: 10.1002/nop2.654. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
5
Improving the quality of nursing documentation at a residential care home: a clinical audit.提高养老院护理文件记录质量:一项临床审计。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 21;20(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00629-9.
6
Predictors of adverse outcomes using a multidimensional nursing assessment in an Italian community hospital.使用多维护理评估在意大利社区医院预测不良结局。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249630. eCollection 2021.
7
Is nursing and midwifery clinical documentation a burden? An empirical study of perception versus reality.护理和助产学临床文档是否是一种负担?感知与现实的实证研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jun;30(11-12):1645-1652. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15718. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Electronic health record usability and workload changes over time for provider and nursing staff following transition to new EHR.电子健康记录在向新的电子健康记录系统过渡后,医护人员的可用性和工作负载会随时间发生变化。
Appl Ergon. 2021 May;93:103359. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103359. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
9
Designing paper-based records to improve the quality of nursing documentation in hospitals: A scoping review.设计基于纸张的记录以提高医院护理文件记录的质量:范围综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jan;30(1-2):56-71. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15545. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
10
Quality of Care: Ecological Study for the Evaluation of Completeness and Accuracy in Nursing Assessment.护理质量:评估护理评估完整性和准确性的生态研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 7;17(9):3259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093259.