• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 REACH 未涉及的低吨位化学品的健康问题进行分析,以及新方法的机会。

Analysis of health concerns not addressed by REACH for low tonnage chemicals and opportunities for new approach methodology.

机构信息

Syngenta Product Safety, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, RG42 6EY, Berkshire, UK.

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2023 Dec;97(12):3075-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03601-5. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-023-03601-5
PMID:37755502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10567824/
Abstract

In Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) the criterion for deciding the studies that must be performed is the annual tonnage of the chemical manufactured or imported into the EU. The annual tonnage may be considered as a surrogate for levels of human exposure but this does not take into account the physico-chemical properties and use patterns that determine exposure. Chemicals are classified using data from REACH under areas of health concern covering effects on the skin and eye; sensitisation; acute, repeated and prolonged systemic exposure; effects on genetic material; carcinogenicity; and reproduction and development. We analysed the mandated study lists under REACH for each annual tonnage band in terms of the information they provide on each of the areas of health concern. Using the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) REACH Registration data base of over 20,000 registered substances, we found that only 19% of registered substances have datasets on all areas of health concern. Information limited to acute exposure, sensitisation and genotoxicity was found for 62%. The analysis highlighted the shortfall of information mandated for substances in the lower tonnage bands. Deploying New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) at this lower tonnage band to assess health concerns which are currently not covered by REACH, such as repeat and extended exposure and carcinogenicity, would provide additional information and would be a way for registrants and regulators to gain experience in the use of NAMs. There are currently projects in Europe aiming to develop NAM-based assessment frameworks and they could find their first use in assessing low tonnage chemicals once confidence has been gained by their evaluation with data rich chemicals.

摘要

在《化学品注册、评估、许可和限制制度》(REACH)中,决定必须进行的研究的标准是在欧盟制造或进口的化学物质的年吨位。年吨位可以被视为人类暴露水平的替代物,但这并没有考虑到决定暴露的物理化学性质和使用模式。化学品是根据涵盖对皮肤和眼睛影响、致敏作用、急性、重复和长期系统暴露、对遗传物质影响、致癌性以及生殖和发育等健康问题领域的 REACH 数据进行分类的。我们根据它们在每个健康问题领域提供的信息,分析了 REACH 下每个年吨位带的强制性研究清单。使用欧洲化学品管理局(ECHA)的超过 20,000 种已注册物质的 REACH 注册数据库,我们发现只有 19%的已注册物质在所有健康问题领域都有数据集。对于 62%的物质,只发现了仅限于急性暴露、致敏和遗传毒性的信息。该分析突出了低吨位物质所要求的信息不足的问题。在这个低吨位带采用新方法方法(NAMs)来评估目前未被 REACH 涵盖的健康问题,如重复和扩展暴露和致癌性,将提供额外的信息,并且是注册人和监管机构在使用 NAMs 方面获得经验的一种方式。目前欧洲有一些旨在开发基于 NAM 的评估框架的项目,一旦通过对富含数据的化学品进行评估获得信心,它们就可以首次用于评估低吨位化学品。

相似文献

1
Analysis of health concerns not addressed by REACH for low tonnage chemicals and opportunities for new approach methodology.对 REACH 未涉及的低吨位化学品的健康问题进行分析,以及新方法的机会。
Arch Toxicol. 2023 Dec;97(12):3075-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00204-023-03601-5. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Environmental Risk Assessment of Technical Mixtures Under the European Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals-A Regulatory Perspective.技术混合物的环境风险评估在欧洲化学品注册、评估、授权和限制制度下——监管视角。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 May;17(3):498-506. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4393. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
A systematic analysis of read-across adaptations in testing proposal evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency.欧洲化学品管理局对测试提案评估中类推法应用的系统分析。
ALTEX. 2025;42(1):22-38. doi: 10.14573/altex.2408292. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
4
An overall strategy for the testing of chemicals for human hazard and risk assessment under the EU REACH system.欧盟化学品注册、评估、授权和限制(REACH)体系下用于人类危害测试及风险评估的化学品总体测试策略。
Altern Lab Anim. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):7-19. doi: 10.1177/026119290303100103.
5
In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies.在REACH信息策略范围内的体外试验。
Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Aug;34(4):377-86. doi: 10.1177/026119290603400408.
6
[Products toxic to reproduction used in the occupational environment: Definition, risk assessment, classification].[职业环境中使用的生殖毒性产品:定义、风险评估、分类]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006 Oct;34(10):950-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.06.021. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
7
Olefins and chemical regulation in Europe: REACH.烯烃和欧洲的化学法规:REACH。
Chem Biol Interact. 2015 Nov 5;241:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
8
A Systematic Analysis of Read-Across Adaptations in Testing Proposal Evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency.欧洲化学品管理局对测试提案评估中类推适应情况的系统分析。
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 30:2024.08.29.610278. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.29.610278.
9
Development of a next generation risk assessment framework for the evaluation of skin sensitisation of cosmetic ingredients.开发新一代风险评估框架,用于评估化妆品成分的皮肤致敏性。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;116:104721. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104721. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Effect thresholds and 'adequate control' of risks: The fatal flaws in the EU council's position on authorisation within REACH.效应阈值与风险的“充分控制”:欧盟理事会在《化学品注册、评估、授权和限制法规》(REACH)下授权立场中的致命缺陷。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2006 Oct;13(6):425-31. doi: 10.1065/espr2006.08.336.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk assessment and management of chemical hazards for pregnant workers: a qualitative review of guidance from EU member states.孕期女职工化学危害的风险评估与管理:对欧盟成员国指南的定性综述
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2025 Apr 2;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12995-025-00456-7.
2
A systematic analysis of read-across adaptations in testing proposal evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency.欧洲化学品管理局对测试提案评估中类推法应用的系统分析。
ALTEX. 2025;42(1):22-38. doi: 10.14573/altex.2408292. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
A twin transition in regulatory toxicology: moving toward Chemicals 2.0 and phasing out animal testing.监管毒理学的双重转变:迈向化学品2.0并逐步淘汰动物试验。
Toxicol Sci. 2025 Feb 1;203(2):160-165. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae130.
4
A Systematic Analysis of Read-Across Adaptations in Testing Proposal Evaluations by the European Chemicals Agency.欧洲化学品管理局对测试提案评估中类推适应情况的系统分析。
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 30:2024.08.29.610278. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.29.610278.

本文引用的文献

1
Reproducibility of organ-level effects in repeat dose animal studies.重复剂量动物研究中器官水平效应的可重复性。
Comput Toxicol. 2023 Nov;28:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2023.100287.
2
Towards a future regulatory framework for chemicals in the European Union - Chemicals 2.0.迈向欧盟化学品监管框架的未来——化学品 2.0。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;142:105431. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory decisions for chemical safety: Report from an EPAA Deep Dive Workshop.新方法学在化学物质安全监管决策中的应用:EPAA 深度研讨会报告。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;135:105261. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105261. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
4
Are Non-animal Systemic Safety Assessments Protective? A Toolbox and Workflow.非动物系统性安全评估是否具有保护作用?工具包和工作流程。
Toxicol Sci. 2022 Aug 25;189(1):124-147. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac068.
5
Beyond AOPs: A Mechanistic Evaluation of NAMs in DART Testing.超越不良结局途径:药物不良反应测试中新型作用机制药物的机制评估
Front Toxicol. 2022 Mar 7;4:838466. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.838466. eCollection 2022.
6
A framework for chemical safety assessment incorporating new approach methodologies within REACH.将新方法纳入 REACH 中的化学安全评估框架。
Arch Toxicol. 2022 Mar;96(3):743-766. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03215-9. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
The codification of hazard and its impact on the hazard versus risk controversy.危害的编纂及其对危害与风险争议的影响。
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Nov;95(11):3611-3621. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03145-6. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Upholding the EU's Commitment to 'Animal Testing as a Last Resort' Under REACH Requires a Paradigm Shift in How We Assess Chemical Safety to Close the Gap Between Regulatory Testing and Modern Safety Science.在 REACH 法规下坚持欧盟“动物测试作为最后手段”的承诺,需要在我们评估化学品安全性的方法上进行范式转变,以缩小监管测试与现代安全科学之间的差距。
Altern Lab Anim. 2021 Jul;49(4):122-132. doi: 10.1177/02611929211040824. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
Paving the way for application of next generation risk assessment to safety decision-making for cosmetic ingredients.为将下一代风险评估应用于化妆品成分的安全决策铺平道路。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;125:105026. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105026. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
10
CATMoS: Collaborative Acute Toxicity Modeling Suite.CATMoS:协作急性毒性建模套件。
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Apr;129(4):47013. doi: 10.1289/EHP8495. Epub 2021 Apr 30.