• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科恶性肿瘤患者的生育力保存:对卵巢刺激的反应和长期结局。

Fertility preservation in patients with gynaecologic malignancy: Response to ovarian stimulation and long-term outcomes.

机构信息

Senior Clinical Fellow in Reproductive Medicine and Assisted Conception, Fertility Preservation Service, ACU, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

Consultant Gynaecologist and Subspecialist in Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, ACU, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Nov;290:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.09.020. Epub 2023 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.09.020
PMID:37757729
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To the best of our knowledge, the available evidence on the effect and efficacy of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in this group of patients remains poorly reported. Concerns related to the impact of stimulation to cancer progression and recurrence, as well as the risk of disease dissemination during egg collection, might explain the aforementioned trend.

METHODS

Overall, our FP Service received 192 gynaecological referrals, between 2005 and 2021, regarding gynaecologic conditions mainly cancer related. A total of 68 (35.4%) patients underwent COS. These patients were diagnosed with the following gynaecologic pathologies: 33 cases (48,5%) of cervical cancer were noted (stage 1b1-2b), 25 ovarian pathology (36.7%), 9 cases (13.2%) of endometrial cancer, and a single case of vaginal cancer (1.5%).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients attending the fertility preservation service was 31.5 (std 5.8). The patients presenting to their initial appointment with a mean BMI 24.5 (IQR 6.9) and a median AFC of 12 (IQR 13). The mean duration of COS was 11 days (IQR 3), and the median dose of gonadotrophins was calculated at 300 IU (IQR 75 IU). In 95.4% of the cases, GnRH agonist was used as a trigger for final maturation. The median number of follicles measuring more than 14 mm at the time of trigger was 11 (IQR 8), whereas the median number of oocytes collected was 11 (IQR 9). The complication rate was reported at less than 2%. So far, one in four women of this FP group (17/68, 25% of the overall group) returned to our service to claim their cryopreserved eggs/embryos and successful livebirths were reported in 58.8% of this sample (10/17 cases). The mean time to return to use their oocytes/embryos was 36 months (min value 16 months - max value 85 months). There was no significant difference in mortality rate between patients who received FP vs those who did not (hazard ratio of mortality was estimated at 0.91 (p-value 0.88)).

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, ovarian stimulation for patients presenting with gynaecologic malignancy is a safe and efficient method of fertility preservation. Undoubtedly, the sample size is limited, however our results are reassuring and highlight the efficacy of COS for the purpose of FP based on data coming from the largest Assisted Conception Unit of the South-East of the UK.

摘要

目的

据我们所知,关于这组患者控制性卵巢刺激(COS)的效果和疗效的现有证据仍报道不足。对刺激对癌症进展和复发的影响以及取卵过程中疾病传播的风险的担忧可能解释了上述趋势。

方法

总体而言,我们的 FP 服务在 2005 年至 2021 年间共收到 192 例妇科转诊,主要涉及妇科癌症相关问题。共有 68 名(35.4%)患者接受了 COS。这些患者被诊断为以下妇科疾病:33 例(48.5%)宫颈癌(1b1-2b 期),25 例卵巢病变(36.7%),9 例子宫内膜癌(13.2%)和 1 例阴道癌(1.5%)。

结果

接受生育力保存服务的患者的平均年龄为 31.5(标准差 5.8)。患者在首次就诊时的平均 BMI 为 24.5(IQR 6.9),AFC 中位数为 12(IQR 13)。COS 的平均持续时间为 11 天(IQR 3),促性腺激素的中位数剂量为 300IU(IQR 75IU)。在 95.4%的情况下,使用 GnRH 激动剂作为最终成熟的触发剂。在触发时测量超过 14mm 的卵泡中位数为 11(IQR 8),而采集的卵母细胞中位数为 11(IQR 9)。报告的并发症发生率低于 2%。到目前为止,该 FP 组中有四分之一的女性(17/68,占总组的 25%)回到我们的服务处要求使用冷冻保存的卵子/胚胎,并且该样本中有 58.8%(10/17 例)报告了活产。返回使用卵子/胚胎的平均时间为 36 个月(最小值 16 个月-最大值 85 个月)。接受 FP 治疗的患者与未接受 FP 治疗的患者之间的死亡率无显著差异(死亡率的风险比估计为 0.91(p 值 0.88))。

结论

根据我们的发现,对患有妇科恶性肿瘤的患者进行卵巢刺激是一种安全有效的生育力保存方法。无疑,样本量有限,但我们的结果令人放心,并根据来自英国东南部最大辅助受孕单位的数据强调了 COS 用于 FP 的疗效。

相似文献

1
Fertility preservation in patients with gynaecologic malignancy: Response to ovarian stimulation and long-term outcomes.妇科恶性肿瘤患者的生育力保存:对卵巢刺激的反应和长期结局。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Nov;290:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.09.020. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
2
Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases.癌症和自身免疫性疾病的性腺毒性治疗后的生育力保存。
J Ovarian Res. 2023 Aug 10;16(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01250-x.
3
Efficacy and safety of controlled ovarian stimulation using GnRH antagonist protocols for emergency fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer-a prospective nationwide Swedish multicenter study.采用 GnRH 拮抗剂方案控制性卵巢刺激在年轻乳腺癌女性中进行紧急生育力保存的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性全国性瑞典多中心研究。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):929-938. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa029.
4
Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.女性肿瘤患者的生育力保存:癌症类型对卵巢刺激反应的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):2051-2059. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew158.
5
Controlled ovarian stimulation outcomes of fertility preservation procedures in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: a retrospective study from a single-tertiary-IVF centre.新诊断乳腺癌患者生育保存术控制性卵巢刺激结局:来自单一三级-IVF 中心的回顾性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Apr;42(3):518-523. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1931067. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.癌症分期和分级对生育力保存结果和卵巢刺激反应的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Mar 1;34(3):530-538. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey382.
7
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger increases the number of oocytes and embryos available for cryopreservation in cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂触发可增加癌症患者进行生育力保存的卵巢刺激中可用于冷冻保存的卵母细胞和胚胎数量。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):532-538. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.027.
8
Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature.我们是否应该进行卵母细胞积累以保留特纳综合征女性的生育能力?一项多中心研究及文献系统综述。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Sep 5;38(9):1733-1745. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead135.
9
Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.将生育力保存程序结合起来,将卵子分散到不同的篮子里:一项可行性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2524-2536. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa193.
10
The Significance of Planned Fertility Preservation for Women With Endometrioma Before an Expected Ovarian Cystectomy.内异症患者行预计卵巢囊肿切除术前行计划性生育力保存的意义。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 15;12:794117. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.794117. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The complexity and challenges of fertility preservation in women with cervix cancer-A prospective cohort study reporting on reproductive outcome and overall survival.宫颈癌女性生育力保存的复杂性与挑战——一项关于生殖结局和总生存的前瞻性队列研究报告
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):86-94. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15007. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
Fertility Preservation in Cervical Cancer-Treatment Strategies and Indications.宫颈癌生育力保存——治疗策略与适应证。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jan 4;31(1):296-306. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31010019.