Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Division of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospitals and Geneva Centre for Inflammation Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Jul 1;63(7):1957-1964. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead515.
This study aimed to evaluate if and how the incidence of serious infection (SI) and active tuberculosis (TB) differ among seven biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients with RA considering the line of therapy.
Patients with RA from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA) cohort who initiated etanercept, certolizumab, infliximab, adalimumab, abatacept, rituximab or tocilizumab from the first to fifth line of therapy were included. Follow-up extended up to 3 years. The primary outcome was SI and the secondary outcome was TB. Event rates were calculated and compared using Cox proportional hazards models, controlling for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weights. Comparisons were made overall and stratified by line of therapy. Sensitivity analysis was restricted to all treatment courses from 2009 (tocilizumab availability) until the end of the study (2018).
Among 33 897 treatment courses (62 513 patient-years) the incidence of SI was 4.4/100 patient-years (95% CI 4.2, 4.5). After adjustment, hazards ratios (HRs) of SI were slightly higher with adalimumab and infliximab compared with etanercept. However, no clear pattern was observed when stratifying by line of therapy in terms of incidence rate or HR. Sensitivity analyses showed similar HRs among these treatments. Regarding TB, all 49 cases occurred during the first three lines of treatment and rarely since 2009.
The risk of serious infections does not appear to be influenced by the line of therapy in patients with RA. However, the risk of TB seems to be more frequent during the initial lines of treatment or prior to 2009.
本研究旨在评估在考虑治疗线的情况下,七种生物 DMARD(bDMARD)在 RA 患者中的严重感染(SI)和活动性结核病(TB)的发生率和差异。
纳入了英国风湿病学会生物制剂登记处 RA 队列(BSRBR-RA)中从一线到五线治疗开始使用依那西普、西妥昔单抗、英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、阿巴西普、利妥昔单抗或托珠单抗的 RA 患者。随访时间最长可达 3 年。主要结局为 SI,次要结局为 TB。使用 Cox 比例风险模型计算和比较事件发生率,并用治疗反概率权重进行混杂因素控制。总体和按治疗线分层进行比较。敏感性分析限制在所有治疗疗程(托珠单抗可获得)从 2009 年到研究结束(2018 年)。
在 33897 个治疗疗程(62513 患者年)中,SI 的发生率为 4.4/100 患者年(95%CI 4.2, 4.5)。调整后,阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗与依那西普相比,SI 的风险比(HR)略高。然而,按治疗线分层,在发生率或 HR 方面没有明显的模式。敏感性分析显示这些治疗方法的 HR 相似。关于 TB,所有 49 例均发生在一线至三线治疗期间,且自 2009 年以来很少发生。
在 RA 患者中,严重感染的风险似乎不受治疗线的影响。然而,TB 的风险似乎在初始治疗线或 2009 年之前更为频繁。