Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):760-770. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216653. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) concerning the safety of synthetic (s) and biological (b) disease-modifying anti rheumatic dugs (DMARDs) to inform the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
An SLR of observational studies comparing safety outcomes of any DMARD with another intervention for the management of RA. A comparator group was required for inclusion. For treatments still without registry data (eg, sarilumab and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors baricitinib, upadacitinib), randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and long-term extensions (LTEs) were used. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed according to standard procedures.
Forty-two observational studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, addressing safety outcomes with bDMARDs and sDMARDs. Nine studies showed no difference in the risk of serious infections across bDMARDs and two studies (high RoB) showed an increased risk with bDMARDs compared with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (adjusted incidence rate ratio 3.1-3.9). The risk of Herpes zoster infection was similar across bDMARDs, but one study showed an increased risk with tofacitinib compared with abatacept (adjusted HR (aHR) 2.0). Five studies showed no increased risk of cancer for bDMARDs compared with csDMARDs. An increased risk of lower intestinal perforation was found for tocilizumab compared with csDMARDs (aHR 4.5) and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (aHR 2.6-4.0). Sixty manuscripts reported safety data from RCTs/LTEs. Overall, no unexpected safety outcomes were found, except for the possibly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with JAK inhibitors.
Data obtained by this SLR confirm the known safety profile of bDMARDs. The risk of VTE in RA, especially in patients on JAK inhibitors, needs further evaluation.
进行系统文献回顾(SLR),以评估合成(s)和生物(b)疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的安全性,为 2019 年更新 EULAR 类风湿关节炎(RA)管理建议提供信息。
SLR 比较了任何 DMARD 与另一种 RA 治疗干预措施的安全性结果。需要纳入对照组。对于仍无登记数据的治疗方法(例如,sarilumab 和 Janus 激酶(JAK)抑制剂 baricitinib、upadacitinib),使用随机对照试验(RCT)和长期扩展(LTE)。根据标准程序评估偏倚风险(RoB)。
42 项观察性研究符合纳入标准,涉及 bDMARDs 和 sDMARDs 的安全性结果。9 项研究表明,bDMARDs 之间严重感染的风险无差异,2 项研究(高 RoB)显示 bDMARDs 与传统合成(cs)DMARDs 相比风险增加(调整后的发病率比 3.1-3.9)。bDMARDs 之间带状疱疹感染的风险相似,但一项研究显示与 abatacept 相比,tofacitinib 风险增加(调整后的 HR(aHR)2.0)。5 项研究表明,bDMARDs 与 csDMARDs 相比,癌症风险无增加。与 csDMARDs 相比,tocilizumab 发生下肠道穿孔的风险增加(aHR 4.5)和肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)(aHR 2.6-4.0)。60 篇手稿报告了 RCT/LTE 的安全性数据。总体而言,除了 JAK 抑制剂可能增加静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险外,未发现其他意外的安全性结果。
这项 SLR 获得的数据证实了 bDMARDs 的已知安全性特征。RA 中 VTE 的风险,特别是在接受 JAK 抑制剂治疗的患者中,需要进一步评估。