Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Department of Audiology, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Dec 1;44(10):1004-1010. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004021. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
To investigate the incidence of electrode contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region in cochlear implant (CI) recipients and to assess its influence on speech recognition for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users.
Retrospective review.
Tertiary referral center.
One hundred five CI recipients with functional acoustic hearing preservation (≤80 dB HL at 250 Hz).
Cochlear implantation with a 24-, 28-, or 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode array.
Angular insertion depth (AID) of individual contacts was determined from imaging. Unaided acoustic thresholds and AID were used to calculate the proximity of contacts to the functional acoustic hearing region. The association between proximity values and speech recognition in quiet and noise for EAS users at 6 months postactivation was reviewed.
Sixty percent of cases had one or more contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region. Proximity was not significantly associated with speech recognition in quiet. Better performance in noise was observed for cases with close correspondence between the most apical contact and the upper edge of residual hearing, with poorer results for increasing proximity values in either the basal or apical direction ( r14 = 0.48, p = 0.043; r18 = -0.41, p = 0.045, respectively).
There was a high incidence of electrode contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region, which is not accounted for with default mapping procedures. The variability in outcomes across EAS users with default maps may be due in part to electric-on-acoustic interference, electric frequency-to-place mismatch, and/or failure to stimulate regions intermediate between the most apical electrode contact and the functional acoustic hearing region.
研究人工耳蜗植入(CI)受者电极接触位于功能性听觉区域内的发生率,并评估其对电-声刺激(EAS)使用者言语识别的影响。
回顾性研究。
三级转诊中心。
105 例具有功能性听觉保留(250 Hz 时≤80 dB HL)的 CI 受者。
植入 24、28 或 31.5-mm 侧墙电极阵列的 CI。
从影像学上确定每个触点的角插入深度(AID)。未助听的听阈和 AID 用于计算触点与功能性听觉区域的接近程度。在激活后 6 个月,回顾 EAS 用户在安静和噪声环境下,接近值与言语识别之间的关系。
60%的病例有一个或多个触点位于功能性听觉区域内。接近值与安静时的言语识别无显著相关性。对于最顶端触点与残余听力上缘之间对应关系良好的病例,噪声中的表现更好,而在基底或顶端方向上接近值增加时,结果更差(r14 = 0.48,p = 0.043;r18 = -0.41,p = 0.045)。
电极接触位于功能性听觉区域内的发生率较高,这是默认映射程序无法解释的。默认映射下,EAS 用户的结果存在差异,部分原因可能是电-声干扰、电频率与位置不匹配,以及/或未能刺激最顶端电极接触与功能性听觉区域之间的中间区域。