• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测接受分次肠道准备的参与者结肠镜检查肠道准备不足:预测评分的制定和验证。

Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066
PMID:25600879
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adequate bowel preparation is important for optimal colonoscopy. It is important to identify patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation because this allows taking precautions in this specific group.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a prediction score to identify patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation who may benefit from an intensified bowel cleansing regimen.

DESIGN

Patient and colonoscopy data were prospectively collected, whereas clinical data were retrospectively collected for a total of 1996 colonoscopies in participants who received split-dose bowel preparation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted in a random two-thirds of the cohort to develop a prediction model. Validation and evaluation of the discriminative power of the prediction model were performed within the remaining one-third of the cohort.

SETTING

Four centers, including one academic and three medium-to-large size nonacademic centers.

PATIENTS

Consecutive colonoscopies in November and December 2012. Mean age was 57.3 ± 15.9 years, 45.8% were male and indications for colonoscopy were screening and/or surveillance (27%), abdominal symptoms and/or blood loss and/or anemia (60%), inflammatory bowel disease (9%), and others (4%).

INTERVENTIONS

Colonoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Inadequate bowel preparation defined as Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score <6.

RESULTS

A total of 1331 colonoscopies were included in the development cohort, of which 172 (12.9%) had an inadequate bowel preparation. Independent factors included in the prediction model were American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score ≥3, use of tricyclic antidepressants, use of opioids, diabetes, chronic constipation, history of abdominal and/or pelvic surgery, history of inadequate bowel preparation, and current hospitalization. The discriminative ability of the scale was good, with an area under the curve of 0.77 in the validation cohort.

LIMITATIONS

Study design partially retrospective, no data on patient compliance.

CONCLUSION

We developed a validated, easy-to-use prediction scale that can be used to identify subjects with an increased risk of inadequate bowel preparation with good accuracy.

摘要

背景

充分的肠道准备对于优化结肠镜检查至关重要。识别肠道准备不足的高危患者非常重要,因为这可以让我们在这一特定人群中采取预防措施。

目的

开发一种预测评分系统,以识别可能受益于强化肠道清洁方案的肠道准备不足的高危患者。

设计

前瞻性收集患者和结肠镜检查数据,回顾性收集共 1996 例接受分次肠道准备的参与者的临床数据。在队列的三分之二随机进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以建立预测模型。在队列的三分之一中进行验证和评估预测模型的判别能力。

设置

包括一家学术中心和三家中等至大型非学术中心在内的 4 家中心。

患者

2012 年 11 月和 12 月连续进行的结肠镜检查。平均年龄为 57.3±15.9 岁,45.8%为男性,结肠镜检查的指征为筛查和/或监测(27%)、腹部症状和/或失血和/或贫血(60%)、炎症性肠病(9%)和其他(4%)。

干预措施

结肠镜检查。

主要观察指标

肠道准备不足定义为波士顿肠道准备量表评分<6。

结果

共纳入 1331 例结肠镜检查,其中 172 例(12.9%)肠道准备不足。预测模型中纳入的独立因素包括美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级系统评分≥3、三环类抗抑郁药、阿片类药物、糖尿病、慢性便秘、腹部和/或盆腔手术史、肠道准备不足史和当前住院治疗。该量表的判别能力良好,验证队列的曲线下面积为 0.77。

局限性

研究设计部分回顾性,无患者依从性数据。

结论

我们开发了一种经过验证、易于使用的预测评分系统,可用于准确识别肠道准备不足的高危患者。

相似文献

1
Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score.预测接受分次肠道准备的参与者结肠镜检查肠道准备不足:预测评分的制定和验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):665-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
2
Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol.个体化结肠镜肠道准备方案的时间到了吗?一项比较匹克硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与 4 升分剂量聚乙二醇的随机对照试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Jun;22(2):129-34.
3
'Pico-Bello-Klean study': effectiveness and patient tolerability of bowel preparation agents sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy. A single-blinded randomized trial.“皮科-贝洛-克莱恩研究”:结肠镜检查前肠道准备药物比沙可啶-枸橼酸镁和聚乙二醇的有效性及患者耐受性。一项单盲随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000192.
4
Preparation regimen is more important than patient-related factors: a randomized trial comparing a standard bowel preparation before colonoscopy with an individualized approach.准备方案比患者相关因素更重要:一项比较结肠镜检查前标准肠道准备与个体化方法的随机试验。
Rom J Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;55(1):36-43. doi: 10.1515/rjim-2016-0047.
5
Single-day sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate versus split-dose polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: A prospective randomized endoscopist-blinded trial.结肠镜检查前肠道准备:单日服用匹可硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与分剂量服用聚乙二醇的对比研究:一项前瞻性随机内镜医师盲法试验
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;30(11):1627-34. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13010.
6
Randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy and acceptability of split- and standard-dose sodium picosulfate plus magnesium citrate for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.比较分剂量和标准剂量的聚乙二醇硫酸钠加枸橼酸镁用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的疗效和可接受性的随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2014 Aug;46(8):662-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365800. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
7
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
8
[Split-dose sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate for morning colonoscopies performed 2 to 6 hours after fluid intake].分剂量服用的比沙可啶钠/枸橼酸镁用于液体摄入后2至6小时进行的上午结肠镜检查
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;36(4):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Polyethylene glycol versus sodium picosulfalte bowel preparation in the setting of a colorectal cancer screening program.在结直肠癌筛查项目中聚乙二醇与匹可硫酸钠肠道准备的比较
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;29(7):384-90. doi: 10.1155/2015/350587. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
10
A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, prospective trial to compare the preference and efficacy of four bowel-cleansing regimens for colonoscopy.一项随机、内镜医师盲法、前瞻性试验,比较四种结肠镜检查肠道清洁方案的偏好性和有效性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):871-7. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.910543. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a gut motility based model for predicting bowel preparation quality.一种基于肠道动力预测肠道准备质量模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 2;15(1):28265. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13739-0.
2
Applying machine learning to predict bowel preparation adequacy in elderly patients for colonoscopy: development and validation of a web-based prediction tool.应用机器学习预测老年患者结肠镜检查肠道准备的充分性:一种基于网络的预测工具的开发与验证
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2474172. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2474172. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
3
Think-Aloud Testing of a Companion App for Colonoscopy Examinations: Usability Study.
结肠镜检查辅助应用程序的有声思维测试:可用性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 12;12:e67043. doi: 10.2196/67043.
4
Derivation and validation of a prediction model for inadequate bowel preparation in Chinese outpatients.中国门诊患者肠道准备不充分预测模型的推导与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):1430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85816-3.
5
Incidence and predicting factors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A cross-sectional study.结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的发生率及预测因素:一项横断面研究。
JGH Open. 2024 Aug 20;8(8):e13116. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13116. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
AN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD PREDICTION MODEL TO IDENTIFY INADEQUATE BOWEL PREPARATION IN PATIENTS AT OUTPATIENT COLONOSCOPY.一种用于识别门诊结肠镜检查患者肠道准备不充分的电子病历预测模型。
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;26(2):130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2023.12.008. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
7
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Constipation Symptoms among Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.结肠镜检查患者便秘症状的患病率及相关因素:一项单中心横断面研究。
Digestion. 2024;105(4):299-309. doi: 10.1159/000539366. Epub 2024 May 16.
8
Development and validation of a novel scoring system based on a nomogram for predicting inadequate bowel preparation.基于列线图的预测不充分肠道准备新型评分系统的建立与验证。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;26(9):2262-2273. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03443-2. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
Can an educational video improve the adequacy of bowel preparation for patients undergoing their first colonoscopy? Results of the EBOPS RCT.一部教育视频能否提高首次接受结肠镜检查患者的肠道准备充分性?EBOPS随机对照试验的结果。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Mar 18;12(3):E402-E412. doi: 10.1055/a-2262-4023. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Establishment of a risk prediction model for bowel preparation failure prior to colonoscopy.建立结肠镜检查前肠道准备失败的风险预测模型。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 14;24(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12081-4.