Chiappinotto Stefania, Bayram Aysun, Grassetti Luca, Galazzi Alessandro, Palese Alvisa
University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 27;22(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01513-4.
Unfinished Nursing Care (UNC) has been documented also during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic; however, while several secondary studies were conducted before this period to summarise occurrences, reasons, and consequences of UNC and provide a global picture of the phenomenon, no synthesis of the evidence produced during the pandemic has been documented to date. Therefore, the aim of this review is to identify differences, if any, in the UNC occurrence, reasons, and consequences perceived by nurses caring for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients.
This study is a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023410602). According to the Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes framework, primary comparative cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cohort studies, randomised/non-randomised controlled trials were included from Medline, CINAHL, and Scopus, collecting perceptions of nurses with tools measuring UNC between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients and published in English, Italian, or Turkish. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline and Johanna Briggs Quality Appraisal Tool were used, and findings were summarised narratively.
Five hospital-based cross-sectional studies using the self-administered MISSCARE and UNC Survey comparing data collected (a) before the pandemic vs. in the first wave; (b) before, in the second and in the third wave; and (c) simultaneously among COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients in the second wave. Three main patterns emerged suggesting a higher UNC occurrence among COVID-19 patients in the first wave, less occurrence among them compared to non-COVID-19 patients in the second wave, and contrasting findings with some in favour and others in contrast to COVID-19 patients. Similar patterns emerged regarding UNC reasons while no studies investigated the UNC consequences.
In the first wave, COVID-19 patients were likely to be at increased risk of UNC, while in later waves non-COVID-19 patients were at increased risk of UNC. Reasons also were different across waves. Findings documented during the COVID-19 pandemic may help to prevent UNC in future disasters.
在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间也有未完成护理(UNC)的记录;然而,在此之前进行了几项二次研究,以总结未完成护理的发生率、原因和后果,并提供该现象的全貌,但迄今为止,尚未有对大流行期间产生的证据进行综合整理的记录。因此,本综述的目的是确定护理COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者的护士所感知到的未完成护理在发生率、原因和后果方面是否存在差异(如有)。
本研究为系统综述(PROSPERO CRD42023410602)。根据人群、暴露因素、对照和结局框架,纳入了来自Medline、CINAHL和Scopus的原发性比较横断面研究、纵向研究和队列研究、随机/非随机对照试验,收集护士对COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者使用未完成护理测量工具的看法,且研究以英文、意大利文或土耳其文发表。采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南和乔安娜·布里格斯质量评估工具,并对研究结果进行叙述性总结。
五项基于医院的横断面研究使用了自行填写的MISSCARE和未完成护理调查问卷,比较了所收集的数据:(a)大流行前与第一波期间;(b)大流行前、第二波和第三波期间;以及(c)第二波期间COVID-19患者和非COVID-19患者同时期的数据。出现了三种主要模式,表明第一波中COVID-19患者的未完成护理发生率较高,第二波中与非COVID-19患者相比其发生率较低,并且研究结果相互矛盾,一些结果支持COVID-19患者,另一些结果则相反。关于未完成护理的原因也出现了类似模式,而没有研究调查未完成护理的后果。
在第一波中,COVID-19患者可能面临更高的未完成护理风险,而在后续波次中,非COVID-19患者面临更高的未完成护理风险。不同波次的原因也有所不同。COVID-19大流行期间记录的研究结果可能有助于预防未来灾难中的未完成护理情况。