Tarchi Pietro, Lanini Maria Chiara, Frassineti Lorenzo, Lanatà Antonio
Department of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 23;13(9):1233. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091233.
The human brain's role in face processing (FP) and decision making for social interactions depends on recognizing faces accurately. However, the prevalence of deepfakes, AI-generated images, poses challenges in discerning real from synthetic identities. This study investigated healthy individuals' cognitive and emotional engagement in a visual discrimination task involving real and deepfake human faces expressing positive, negative, or neutral emotions. Electroencephalographic (EEG) data were collected from 23 healthy participants using a 21-channel dry-EEG headset; power spectrum and event-related potential (ERP) analyses were performed. Results revealed statistically significant activations in specific brain areas depending on the authenticity and emotional content of the stimuli. Power spectrum analysis highlighted a right-hemisphere predominance in theta, alpha, high-beta, and gamma bands for real faces, while deepfakes mainly affected the frontal and occipital areas in the delta band. ERP analysis hinted at the possibility of discriminating between real and synthetic faces, as N250 (200-300 ms after stimulus onset) peak latency decreased when observing real faces in the right frontal (LF) and left temporo-occipital (LTO) areas, but also within emotions, as P100 (90-140 ms) peak amplitude was found higher in the right temporo-occipital (RTO) area for happy faces with respect to neutral and sad ones.
人类大脑在面部处理(FP)和社交互动决策中的作用取决于准确识别面孔。然而,深度伪造技术(人工智能生成的图像)的盛行给辨别真实身份与合成身份带来了挑战。本研究调查了健康个体在涉及表达积极、消极或中性情绪的真实和深度伪造人脸的视觉辨别任务中的认知和情感参与情况。使用21通道干式脑电图耳机从23名健康参与者收集脑电图(EEG)数据;进行了功率谱和事件相关电位(ERP)分析。结果显示,根据刺激的真实性和情感内容,特定脑区有统计学上显著的激活。功率谱分析突出显示,对于真实面孔,在θ、α、高β和γ波段中右半球占主导,而深度伪造面孔主要影响δ波段中的额叶和枕叶区域。ERP分析暗示了区分真实面孔和合成面孔的可能性,因为在右额叶(LF)和左颞枕叶(LTO)区域观察真实面孔时,N250(刺激开始后200 - 300毫秒)的峰值潜伏期缩短,而且在不同情绪之间也有差异,因为对于快乐面孔,右颞枕叶(RTO)区域的P100(90 - 140毫秒)峰值幅度相对于中性和悲伤面孔更高。