• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手部动作揭示注意力状态和阈下语义加工:一种鼠标追踪技术。

Hand Motions Reveal Attentional Status and Subliminal Semantic Processing: A Mouse-Tracking Technique.

作者信息

Xiao Kunchen, Zhang Anqi, Qu Jingke, Deng Feifei, Guo Chenyan, Yamauchi Takashi

机构信息

Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4235, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 31;13(9):1267. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091267.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci13091267
PMID:37759868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10526379/
Abstract

Theories of embodied cognition suggest that hand motions and cognition are closely interconnected. An emerging technique of tracking how participants move a computer mouse (i.e., the mouse-tracking technique) has shown advantages over the traditional response time measurement to detect implicit cognitive conflicts. Previous research suggests that attention is essential for subliminal processing to take place at a semantic level. However, this assumption is challenged by evidence showing the presence of subliminal semantic processing in the near-absence of attention. The inconsistency of evidence could stem from the insufficient sensitivity in the response time measurement. Therefore, we examined the role of attention in subliminal semantic processing by analyzing participants' hand motions using the mouse-tracking technique. The results suggest that subliminal semantic processing is not only enhanced by attention but also occurs when attention is disrupted, challenging the necessity of facilitated top-down attention for subliminal semantic processing, as claimed by a number of studies. In addition, by manipulating the color of attentional cues, our experiment shows that the cue color per se could influence participants' response patterns. Overall, the current study suggests that attentional status and subliminal semantic processing can be reliably revealed by temporal-spatial features extracted from cursor motion trajectories.

摘要

具身认知理论表明,手部动作与认知紧密相连。一种追踪参与者如何移动电脑鼠标的新兴技术(即鼠标追踪技术)已显示出相较于传统反应时间测量方法在检测内隐认知冲突方面的优势。先前的研究表明,注意力对于语义层面的阈下加工至关重要。然而,有证据显示在几乎没有注意力的情况下也存在阈下语义加工,这一假设受到了挑战。证据的不一致可能源于反应时间测量的灵敏度不足。因此,我们通过使用鼠标追踪技术分析参与者的手部动作,研究了注意力在阈下语义加工中的作用。结果表明,阈下语义加工不仅会因注意力而增强,而且在注意力被干扰时也会发生,这对一些研究声称的阈下语义加工需要自上而下的注意力促进的必要性提出了挑战。此外,通过操纵注意力线索的颜色,我们的实验表明线索颜色本身会影响参与者的反应模式。总体而言,当前研究表明,从光标运动轨迹中提取的时空特征能够可靠地揭示注意力状态和阈下语义加工。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/a7f33e762ba0/brainsci-13-01267-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/72c5292b8de9/brainsci-13-01267-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/8244b8218310/brainsci-13-01267-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/759b8221aeb4/brainsci-13-01267-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/e2bba1b75662/brainsci-13-01267-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/a7f33e762ba0/brainsci-13-01267-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/72c5292b8de9/brainsci-13-01267-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/8244b8218310/brainsci-13-01267-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/759b8221aeb4/brainsci-13-01267-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/e2bba1b75662/brainsci-13-01267-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e3a/10526379/a7f33e762ba0/brainsci-13-01267-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Hand Motions Reveal Attentional Status and Subliminal Semantic Processing: A Mouse-Tracking Technique.手部动作揭示注意力状态和阈下语义加工:一种鼠标追踪技术。
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 31;13(9):1267. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13091267.
2
The role of attention in subliminal semantic processing: A mouse tracking study.注意力在阈下语义加工中的作用:一项鼠标追踪研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 13;12(6):e0178740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178740. eCollection 2017.
3
Subliminal semantic priming in near absence of attention: A cursor motion study.在几乎没有注意力的情况下的阈下语义启动:一项光标移动研究。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec 15;38:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
4
Stimulus-driven attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.阈下起始线索对刺激驱动的注意捕获
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):737-48. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0802-4.
5
Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming.无意识认知的注意敏化:任务集调节随后的掩蔽语义启动。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Aug;139(3):464-89. doi: 10.1037/a0019561.
6
Testing the attentional boundary conditions of subliminal semantic priming: the influence of semantic and phonological task sets.测试阈下语义启动的注意边界条件:语义和语音任务集的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 29;6:241. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00241. eCollection 2012.
7
The Nature of Unconscious Attention to Subliminal Cues.对阈下线索的无意识注意的本质
Vision (Basel). 2019 Aug 1;3(3):38. doi: 10.3390/vision3030038.
8
Spatiotemporal commonalities of fronto-parietal activation in attentional orienting triggered by supraliminal and subliminal gaze cues: An event-related potential study.阈上和阈下注视线索引发的注意定向中额顶叶激活的时空共性:一项事件相关电位研究。
Biol Psychol. 2018 Jul;136:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
Controlling the unconscious: attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuomotor processes differentially.控制无意识:注意任务集对潜意识语义和视动加工的调节作用不同。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb;22(2):282-91. doi: 10.1177/0956797610397056. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
10
Specifying attentional top-down influences on subsequent unconscious semantic processing.明确自上而下的注意力对后续无意识语义加工的影响。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2009 Aug 21;5:56-68. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0067-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The synergy of embodied cognition and cognitive load theory for optimized learning.具身认知与认知负荷理论的协同作用以实现优化学习。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02152-2.

本文引用的文献

1
A mouse-tracking study of the composite nature of the Stroop effect at the level of response execution.一项在反应执行层面探究斯特鲁普效应复合本质的鼠标追踪研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0279036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279036. eCollection 2023.
2
No effect of attentional modulation by spatial cueing in a masked numerical priming paradigm using continuous flash suppression (CFS).在使用连续闪光抑制(CFS)的掩蔽数字启动范式中,空间线索对注意的调节没有影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 6;11:e14607. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14607. eCollection 2023.
3
Making decisions about health information on social media: a mouse-tracking study.
社交媒体健康信息决策:一项鼠标追踪研究。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 22;7(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00414-5.
4
The Essential Role of Executive Attention in Unconscious Visuomotor Priming.执行性注意在无意识视觉运动启动中的重要作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 30;13:800781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800781. eCollection 2022.
5
Discerning Mouse Trajectory Features With the Drift Diffusion Model.用漂移扩散模型辨别老鼠轨迹特征。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Oct;45(10):e13046. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13046.
6
No fruits without color: Cross-modal priming and EEG reveal different roles for different features across semantic categories.无颜色,不成果:跨模态启动和 EEG 揭示跨语义类别不同特征的不同作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0234219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234219. eCollection 2021.
7
Tracking stress via the computer mouse? Promises and challenges of a potential behavioral stress marker.通过计算机鼠标追踪压力?一种潜在行为压力标志物的前景与挑战。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2281-2301. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01568-8. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Cross-modal motion aftereffects transfer between vision and touch in early deaf adults.早期聋人视觉与触觉之间的跨模态运动后效转移。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 23;11(1):4395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83960-0.
9
Cognitive brakes in interference resolution: A mouse-tracking and EEG co-registration study.干扰解决中的认知刹车:一项鼠标追踪和 EEG 配准研究。
Cortex. 2020 Dec;133:188-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis.意识加工与全局神经元工作空间假说。
Neuron. 2020 Mar 4;105(5):776-798. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.026.