Prause Elisabeth, Hey Jeremias, Schmidt Franziska, Nicic Robert, Beuer Florian, Unkovskiy Alexey
Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Martin-Luther-University, 06112 Halle, Germany.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Aug 22;10(9):992. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10090992.
To date, no scientific data is available regarding the development and radiographic assessment of approximal caries development after the insertion of 3D-printed, non-invasive veneers of different restoration thicknesses. For the present study, non-invasive veneers were fabricated from two different materials for printing and milling (Vita Enamic and VarseoSmile Crown plus). Three different restoration thicknesses (0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 mm) were selected. After digital design, leaving the approximal space free, and manufacturing of the restorations, adhesive insertion followed. All specimens were placed in a demineralizing solution for 28 days. Subsequently, a radiological and fluorescent examination was performed. The present study showed statistically significant interactions for the day ( < 0.0001) and manufacturing method ( < 0.0001) but not for restoration thickness. Additive manufactured restorations showed less radiological caries progression compared to subtractive manufactured restorations after 21 and 28 days (0.7 and 0.9 mm restoration thickness) ( < 0.0001). DIAGNOdent proved that the restoration thickness affected the caries progression within the subtractive group ( < 0.0001). Radiographic and fluorescence examination showed equivalent results regarding approximal caries assessment. For additive manufacturing, less caries progression was shown without consideration of the restoration thickness.
迄今为止,尚无关于植入不同修复厚度的3D打印无创贴面后邻面龋发展及影像学评估的科学数据。在本研究中,采用两种不同的材料通过打印和铣削制作无创贴面(维他依耐美和瓦瑟奥微笑全冠加)。选择了三种不同的修复厚度(0.5、0.7和0.9毫米)。经过数字化设计,留出邻面间隙,制作修复体后,进行粘结就位。所有标本置于脱矿溶液中28天。随后,进行了放射学和荧光检查。本研究显示,天数(<0.0001)和制作方法(<0.0001)存在统计学上的显著交互作用,但修复厚度不存在。在21天和28天后(修复厚度为0.7和0.9毫米),增材制造的修复体与减材制造的修复体相比,显示出较少的放射学龋进展(<0.0001)。DIAGNOdent证明修复厚度影响减材制造组内的龋进展(<0.0001)。放射学和荧光检查在邻面龋评估方面显示出等效结果。对于增材制造,不考虑修复厚度时,龋进展较少。