Pinnetta Giuseppe, Adamini Aloe, Severina Franco, Fagioli Franca, Zanini Cristina, Ferrero Ivana
Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Laboratory, City of Health and Science of Turin, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy.
BIOAIR S.p.A. Scientific Department & Training Centre, Molecular Biotechnology Centre, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;10(9):1047. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10091047.
The primary aim of this systematic analysis is to highlight opportunities to improve the environmental impact of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) manufacturing. We have compared the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions expressed in CO2eq of a classic clean room open system (AinB) Cell Factory versus a comparable closed system equipped with isolators (AinD). We have therefore outlined a theoretical situation to simulate the use of a closed system with an equivalent production output to that obtained in the Cell Factory (CF) of the Regina Margherita Children's Hospital. Open and closed systems for ATMPs have been compared as regards energy requirements, ecological footprints, and costs by analyzing a hypothetic cell production cycle of 21 days. The results demonstrate energy saving and a reduction of 52% in GHG emissions using closed systems per process cycle. Moreover, a reduction in production costs in an isolator setting is also evident. This study shows that the closed system solution has evident advantages compared with the open one.
本系统分析的主要目的是突出改善先进治疗药品(ATMP)生产对环境影响的机会。我们比较了经典洁净室开放系统(AinB)细胞工厂与配备隔离器的类似封闭系统(AinD)以二氧化碳当量表示的温室气体(GHG)排放。因此,我们勾勒了一种理论情况,以模拟使用与 Regina Margherita 儿童医院细胞工厂(CF)获得的产量相当的封闭系统。通过分析假设的 21 天细胞生产周期,比较了 ATMP 的开放和封闭系统在能源需求、生态足迹和成本方面的情况。结果表明,每个工艺周期使用封闭系统可节能并减少 52%的温室气体排放。此外,在隔离器环境中生产成本的降低也很明显。本研究表明,与开放系统相比,封闭系统解决方案具有明显优势。