• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

野火后考拉的健康评估:康复个体与未获救常住个体的时间比较

Health Assessments of Koalas after Wildfire: A Temporal Comparison of Rehabilitated and Non-Rescued Resident Individuals.

作者信息

Lane Murraya R, Lowe Arianne, Vukcevic Jelena, Clark Robert G, Madani George, Higgins Damien P, Silver Luke, Belov Katherine, Hogg Carolyn J, Marsh Karen J

机构信息

Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

Stromlo Veterinary Services, P.O. Box 3963, Weston, ACT 2611, Australia.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 9;13(18):2863. doi: 10.3390/ani13182863.

DOI:10.3390/ani13182863
PMID:37760263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10525633/
Abstract

Many koalas () required rehabilitation after the 2019/20 Australian megafires. Little is known about how the post-release health of rehabilitated koalas compares to non-rescued resident koalas. We evaluated health parameters in rehabilitated koalas and resident koalas in burnt and unburnt habitat in southern New South Wales, Australia. Health checks were undertaken within six weeks of fire (rehabilitated group), 5-9 months post-fire and 12-16 months post-fire. Body condition improved significantly over time in rehabilitated koalas, with similar condition between all groups at 12-16 months. Rehabilitated koalas therefore gained body condition at similar rates to koalas who remained and survived in the wild. The prevalence of was also similar between groups and timepoints, suggesting wildfire and rehabilitation did not exacerbate disease in this population. While there was some variation in measured serum biochemistry and haematology parameters between groups and timepoints, most were within normal reference ranges. Our findings show that koalas were generally healthy at the time of release and when recaptured nine months later. Landscapes in the Monaro region exhibiting a mosaic of burn severity can support koalas, and rehabilitated koala health is not compromised by returning them to burnt habitats 4-6 months post-fire.

摘要

在2019/20年澳大利亚特大火灾之后,许多考拉需要康复治疗。对于康复后的考拉放归后的健康状况与未获救的本地考拉相比情况如何,人们知之甚少。我们评估了澳大利亚新南威尔士州南部烧毁和未烧毁栖息地中康复考拉和本地考拉的健康参数。在火灾发生后的六周内(康复组)、火灾后5 - 9个月以及火灾后12 - 16个月进行了健康检查。康复考拉的身体状况随时间显著改善,在12 - 16个月时所有组的状况相似。因此,康复考拉的身体状况恢复速度与留在野外并存活下来的考拉相似。各组之间以及不同时间点的患病率也相似,这表明野火和康复治疗并未加剧该种群的疾病。虽然各组之间以及不同时间点在测量的血清生化和血液学参数上存在一些差异,但大多数都在正常参考范围内。我们的研究结果表明,考拉在放归时以及九个月后再次捕获时总体健康。莫纳罗地区呈现出不同火烧严重程度镶嵌格局的景观能够支持考拉生存,并且在火灾后4 - 6个月将康复考拉放归到烧毁的栖息地不会损害它们的健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/3a8659ac9a88/animals-13-02863-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/792c5bdd1b86/animals-13-02863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/28405b47992f/animals-13-02863-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/571d99e75e54/animals-13-02863-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/83496485fd1d/animals-13-02863-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/de91f370274a/animals-13-02863-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/3a8659ac9a88/animals-13-02863-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/792c5bdd1b86/animals-13-02863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/28405b47992f/animals-13-02863-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/571d99e75e54/animals-13-02863-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/83496485fd1d/animals-13-02863-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/de91f370274a/animals-13-02863-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2408/10525633/3a8659ac9a88/animals-13-02863-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Assessments of Koalas after Wildfire: A Temporal Comparison of Rehabilitated and Non-Rescued Resident Individuals.野火后考拉的健康评估:康复个体与未获救常住个体的时间比较
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 9;13(18):2863. doi: 10.3390/ani13182863.
2
An Analysis of Demographic and Triage Assessment Findings in Bushfire-Affected Koalas () on Kangaroo Island, South Australia, 2019-2020.2019 - 2020年南澳大利亚袋鼠岛受丛林大火影响的考拉的人口统计学和分诊评估结果分析
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 12;11(11):3237. doi: 10.3390/ani11113237.
3
Trends in Rescue and Rehabilitation of Marsupials Surviving the Australian 2019-2020 Bushfires.2019 - 2020年澳大利亚丛林大火后有袋动物救援与康复的趋势
Animals (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;14(7):1019. doi: 10.3390/ani14071019.
4
Haematological reference intervals of wild southern Australian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus).澳大利亚南部野生树袋熊(灰树袋熊)的血液学参考区间
Aust Vet J. 2020 May;98(5):207-215. doi: 10.1111/avj.12923. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
5
PREVALENCE AND PATHOLOGIC FEATURES OF CHLAMYDIA PECORUM INFECTIONS IN SOUTH AUSTRALIAN KOALAS (PHASCOLARCTOS CINEREUS).南澳大利亚树袋熊(考拉)衣原体感染的患病率及病理特征
J Wildl Dis. 2016 Apr 28;52(2):301-6. doi: 10.7589/2015-05-120. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
6
Potential 'ecological traps' of restored landscapes: koalas Phascolarctos cinereus re-occupy a rehabilitated mine site.恢复景观的潜在“生态陷阱”:树袋熊(Phascolarctos cinereus)重新占据了一个修复后的矿区。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 25;8(11):e80469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080469. eCollection 2013.
7
Non-invasive evaluation of physiological stress in an iconic Australian marsupial: the Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus).非侵入性评估标志性澳大利亚有袋动物——考拉(Phascolarctos cinereus)的生理应激。
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2013 Jun 15;187:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2013.03.021. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
8
Identification of unusual Chlamydia pecorum genotypes in Victorian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) and clinical variables associated with infection.在维多利亚州考拉(Phascolarctos cinereus)中鉴定不寻常的考拉衣原体基因型以及与感染相关的临床变量。
J Med Microbiol. 2016 May;65(5):420-428. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000241. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
9
Epidemiology of chlamydial infection and disease in a free-ranging koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) population.自由放养的考拉(树袋熊,Phascolarctos cinereus)种群中衣原体感染与疾病的流行病学
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0190114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190114. eCollection 2017.
10
The prevalence and clinical significance of Chlamydia infection in island and mainland populations of Victorian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus).维多利亚州考拉(灰袋熊)岛屿种群和大陆种群中衣原体感染的患病率及临床意义。
J Wildl Dis. 2015 Apr;51(2):309-17. doi: 10.7589/2014-07-176. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Systemic antibiotic use in fire-affected koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) admitted to two wildlife treatment facilities during the 2019-2020 wildfires.2019 - 2020年野火期间,被送往两家野生动物治疗机构的受火灾影响的考拉(树袋熊,学名:Phascolarctos cinereus)使用全身性抗生素的情况。
Aust Vet J. 2025 Aug;103(8):475-486. doi: 10.1111/avj.70006. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
2
Factors that influence the decision to release rehabilitated koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) to fire-affected home sites.影响将康复的考拉(树袋熊,Phascolarctos cinereus)放归到受火灾影响的原生栖息地这一决策的因素。
Aust Vet J. 2025 Aug;103(8):464-474. doi: 10.1111/avj.13413. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes for an arboreal folivore after rehabilitation and implications for management.树栖食叶动物康复后的结果及其管理意义。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 21;13(1):6542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33535-y.
2
Koala Genome Survey: An Open Data Resource to Improve Conservation Planning.考拉基因组调查:改善保护规划的开源数据资源。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Feb 22;14(3):546. doi: 10.3390/genes14030546.
3
An Analysis of Demographic and Triage Assessment Findings in Bushfire-Affected Koalas () on Kangaroo Island, South Australia, 2019-2020.2019 - 2020年南澳大利亚袋鼠岛受丛林大火影响的考拉的人口统计学和分诊评估结果分析
Preliminary analyses of tryptophan, kynurenine, and the kynurenine: Tryptophan ratio in plasma, as potential biomarkers for systemic chlamydial infections in koalas.
对考拉血浆中色氨酸、犬尿氨酸以及犬尿氨酸与色氨酸的比值进行初步分析,作为全身性衣原体感染的潜在生物标志物。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0314945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314945. eCollection 2024.
4
Home ranges and movements of an arboreal folivore after wildfire: comparing rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated animals in burnt and unburnt woodlands.野火后一种树栖食叶动物的活动范围和移动情况:比较在烧毁林地和未烧毁林地中经过康复治疗和未经过康复治疗的动物
Mov Ecol. 2024 Dec 3;12(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00519-0.
5
Trends in Rescue and Rehabilitation of Marsupials Surviving the Australian 2019-2020 Bushfires.2019 - 2020年澳大利亚丛林大火后有袋动物救援与康复的趋势
Animals (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;14(7):1019. doi: 10.3390/ani14071019.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 12;11(11):3237. doi: 10.3390/ani11113237.
4
Ancient and modern genomes unravel the evolutionary history of the rhinoceros family.古代和现代基因组揭示了犀科动物的进化历史。
Cell. 2021 Sep 16;184(19):4874-4885.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.032. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
5
Runs of homozygosity in killer whale genomes provide a global record of demographic histories.虎鲸基因组中的纯合子片段提供了种群历史的全球记录。
Mol Ecol. 2021 Dec;30(23):6162-6177. doi: 10.1111/mec.16137. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
Emergency Response to Australia's Black Summer 2019-2020: The Role of a Zoo-Based Conservation Organisation in Wildlife Triage, Rescue, and Resilience for the Future.对2019 - 2020年澳大利亚黑色夏季的应急响应:一个以动物园为基础的保护组织在野生动物分类、救援及未来恢复力方面的作用。
Animals (Basel). 2021 May 23;11(6):1515. doi: 10.3390/ani11061515.
7
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios in dogs and cats with acute pancreatitis.犬猫急性胰腺炎的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值。
Vet Clin Pathol. 2021 Mar;50(1):45-51. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12979. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
8
Real-time drone derived thermal imagery outperforms traditional survey methods for an arboreal forest mammal.实时无人机热成像技术优于传统的林冠层森林哺乳动物调查方法。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 16;15(11):e0242204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242204. eCollection 2020.
9
After the Megafires: What Next for Australian Wildlife?山火之后:澳大利亚野生动物的未来如何?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep;35(9):753-757. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
10
Helping koalas battle disease - Recent advances in Chlamydia and koala retrovirus (KoRV) disease understanding and treatment in koalas.帮助考拉对抗疾病——衣原体和考拉逆转录病毒(KoRV)疾病理解和治疗的最新进展。
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2020 Sep 1;44(5):583-605. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa024.