McDougall F K, Funnell O, McLelland J M, Flanagan C, Govendir M, Stoeckeler F, Smith I, Power M L
School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.
Zoos South Australia, Frome Rd, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Aust Vet J. 2025 Aug;103(8):475-486. doi: 10.1111/avj.70006. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat for people and animals, including wildlife. The overuse and misuse of antimicrobials continues to fuel the spread of AMR. We performed a retrospective analysis of systemic antibiotic administration in fire-affected koalas admitted to two wildlife treatment facilities during the catastrophic Australian wildfires in 2019-2020, to assess the practice of antimicrobial stewardship during a wildlife emergency. Triage and treatment records were obtained for fire-affected koalas (n = 355) admitted to two facilities during the wildfires. Analyses showed that 40.3% of koalas at Facility A and 35.0% of koalas at Facility B received systemic antibiotics. The majority of antibiotics (63.9%, comprising multiple types of beta-lactams) administered to koalas at Facility A were prophylactic treatments in koalas with noninfected moderate to severe cutaneous burn wounds. The majority of antibiotics (75.0%, comprising chloramphenicol and enrofloxacin) administered to koalas at Facility B were chlamydial disease treatments. Overall, 29.4% of all antibiotic treatments (predominantly beta-lactams and enrofloxacin) were administered for recorded clinical infections. Where koala-specific guidelines and protocols for treating burn wounds were not available, there was an overuse of systemic antibiotics and frequently sub-optimal antibiotic stewardship in burnt koalas during the 2019-2020 wildfire emergency response. Best practice antibiotic prescribing was also not always feasible due to a shortage of first-choice antibiotics (e.g., injectable chloramphenicol for chlamydial disease). This study highlights the importance of preparedness for future wildfire events and identifies a need for equipping veterinarians with guidelines for treating fire-affected koalas during emergency situations. Additional education, guidance and resources are required to enable appropriate antimicrobial stewardship by responding veterinarians during wildlife emergencies.
抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)对包括野生动物在内的人类和动物构成全球健康威胁。抗菌药物的过度使用和滥用继续助长AMR的传播。我们对2019 - 2020年澳大利亚灾难性野火期间被送往两家野生动物治疗机构的受火灾影响的考拉进行了全身抗生素给药的回顾性分析,以评估野生动物紧急情况期间的抗菌药物管理实践。获取了野火期间被送往两家机构的受火灾影响的考拉(n = 355)的分诊和治疗记录。分析表明,机构A中40.3%的考拉和机构B中35.0%的考拉接受了全身抗生素治疗。在机构A接受治疗的考拉中,大多数抗生素(63.9%,包括多种类型的β - 内酰胺类)是用于对未感染的中度至重度皮肤烧伤伤口的考拉进行预防性治疗。在机构B接受治疗的考拉中,大多数抗生素(75.0%,包括氯霉素和恩诺沙星)是用于治疗衣原体疾病。总体而言,所有抗生素治疗中有29.4%(主要是β - 内酰胺类和恩诺沙星)是针对有记录的临床感染进行的。在没有针对考拉治疗烧伤伤口的特定指南和方案的情况下,在2019 - 2020年野火应急响应期间,全身抗生素存在过度使用的情况,并且在烧伤的考拉中抗菌药物管理往往不理想。由于缺乏首选抗生素(例如用于衣原体疾病的注射用氯霉素),最佳实践抗生素处方也并非总是可行的。这项研究强调了为未来野火事件做好准备的重要性,并确定需要为兽医提供在紧急情况下治疗受火灾影响的考拉的指南。需要额外的教育、指导和资源,以使应急兽医在野生动物紧急情况期间能够进行适当的抗菌药物管理。