Lindemann Chris, Hölzl Alexander, Böhle Sabrina, Zippelius Timo, Strube Patrick
Orthopedic Department, Jena University Hospital, Campus Eisenberg, Friedrich Schiller University, 07607 Eisenberg, Germany.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 8;13(18):2882. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182882.
The aim of this study was to research the influence of psychological confounders on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after lumbar infiltration therapies of periradicular infiltrations (PRI). Patients who underwent PRI in a single center between June 2018 and December 2019 were included. PRI was performed in patients with predominantly unilateral lumbar radiculopathy which existed for at least 6 weeks based on single-level nerve root compression (caused by a herniated disc, stenosis of the lateral recess, or neuroforamen), confirmed by morphological imaging. The numeric pain rating scale (NRS) for back pain (BP) and leg pain (LP) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed preinterventionally, on the first day (only NRS) and at 6 weeks, and then 3, 6, and 12 months postinterventionally. The minimally clinically important difference (MCID) served as the threshold for the therapeutic effectiveness evaluation. The health-related quality of life (SF-36) was recorded preinterventionally and after 12 months. Based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the patients were dichotomized into depressed or nondepressed and anxious or nonanxious. Categorical data were evaluated using Fisher's exact test, and continuous data were evaluated using Student's test. Separate linear mixed models were built to estimate the effect of anxiety or depression on repeatedly measured PROs following PRI. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. The analysis included 102 patients. Most mean baseline PROs were significantly worse in anxious or depressed patients than in nonanxious or nondepressed patients: Anxiety NRS-BP ( = 0.007), ODI ( < 0.001); Depression NRS-BP ( = 0.026), NRS-LP ( < 0.001), ODI ( < 0.001). All patients showed a clinically meaningful reduction in pain and functional improvement over a 12-month follow-up. There was no significant difference in the estimated overall mean PRO between all patients ( > 0.05). In conclusion, anxiety and depression are associated with worse PROs before and after PRI. However, patients with underlying depression or anxiety can expect a similar gain in PRO compared to patients without depressive or anxious symptoms.
本研究的目的是探讨心理混杂因素对腰椎神经根周围浸润疗法(PRI)后患者报告结局(PROs)的影响。纳入了2018年6月至2019年12月在单一中心接受PRI的患者。PRI适用于主要为单侧腰椎神经根病且基于单节段神经根受压(由椎间盘突出、侧隐窝狭窄或神经孔狭窄引起)存在至少6周的患者,经形态学影像学证实。在干预前、第一天(仅数字疼痛评分量表[NRS])、6周时以及干预后3、6和12个月评估背痛(BP)和腿痛(LP)的数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)以及奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)。最小临床重要差异(MCID)用作治疗效果评估的阈值。在干预前和12个月后记录健康相关生活质量(SF - 36)。根据医院焦虑抑郁量表,将患者分为抑郁或非抑郁以及焦虑或非焦虑。分类数据使用Fisher精确检验进行评估,连续数据使用学生检验进行评估。建立单独的线性混合模型以估计焦虑或抑郁对PRI后重复测量的PROs的影响。使用SPSS软件进行数据分析。分析纳入了102例患者。大多数平均基线PROs在焦虑或抑郁患者中显著差于非焦虑或非抑郁患者:焦虑患者NRS - BP( = 0.007),ODI( < 0.001);抑郁患者NRS - BP( = 0.026),NRS - LP( < 0.001),ODI( < 0.001)。所有患者在12个月的随访中疼痛均有临床意义的减轻且功能得到改善。所有患者之间估计的总体平均PRO无显著差异( > 0.05)。总之,焦虑和抑郁与PRI前后较差的PROs相关。然而,与无抑郁或焦虑症状的患者相比,有潜在抑郁或焦虑的患者在PRO方面有望获得相似的改善。