Calineata Martin, Jennewein Lukas, Neef Vanessa, Flinspach Armin Niklas, Louwen Frank, Zacharowski Kai, Raimann Florian Jürgen
Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 5;12(18):5770. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185770.
The epidural catheter for analgesia has been used for decades and has become the gold standard in pain therapy for pregnant women in labour. However, procedural parameters such as time to pain relief and duration to implementation pose hurdles for patients shortly before delivery. Low-dose spinal analgesia (LDSA) is an alternative procedure that was investigated in the study with regard to patient satisfaction and complication rates compared to epidural catheter.
In a retrospective monocentric study, a total of 242 patients receiving low-dose spinal analgesia or epidural catheters were evaluated using propensity score matching. Subjective patient satisfaction as well as complication rates were primarily analysed. We hypothesise that LDSA is a safe procedure and provides a similar level of satisfaction compared with the epidural catheter. For this purpose, both procedures were performed according to in-house standards and the patients were interviewed afterwards. Patients who required surgical delivery were excluded to prevent bias.
The LDSA was rated on average as very good [1.09 ± 0.311 vs. 1.07 ± 0.431] in terms of satisfaction by the patients compared to the epidural catheter without showing a significant difference ( = 0.653). Complications were in the low single-digit non-significant range for both procedures [6 (5%) vs. 7 (6%); = 0.776]. The evaluation showed more perineal tears I° and II° in the low-dose spinal analgesia group [I°: 28 (23%) vs. 3 (2%); < 0.001-II°: 30 (25%) vs. 2 (2%); < 0.001]. Neonatal parameters differed significantly only in umbilical cord base excess and umbilical cord venous pH [-5.40 vs. -6.40; = 0.005].
LDSA represents a low complication procedure for patients at the end of labour with a high satisfaction level. With the LDSA in the repertoire of pain relief during childbirth, it is possible to also achieve pain reduction for women with deliveries of high velocity without compromising patient satisfaction or perinatal morbidity.
用于镇痛的硬膜外导管已使用数十年,已成为分娩期孕妇疼痛治疗的金标准。然而,诸如疼痛缓解时间和实施时间等操作参数在分娩前不久给患者带来了障碍。低剂量脊髓镇痛(LDSA)是一种替代方法,该研究对其与硬膜外导管相比的患者满意度和并发症发生率进行了调查。
在一项回顾性单中心研究中,使用倾向评分匹配法对总共242例接受低剂量脊髓镇痛或硬膜外导管的患者进行了评估。主要分析了患者的主观满意度以及并发症发生率。我们假设LDSA是一种安全的方法,与硬膜外导管相比能提供相似的满意度水平。为此,两种方法均按照内部标准进行操作,之后对患者进行访谈。排除需要手术分娩的患者以防止偏差。
与硬膜外导管相比,患者对LDSA的满意度平均评分为非常好[1.09±0.311对1.07±0.431],无显著差异(P = 0.653)。两种方法的并发症发生率均在个位数较低且无显著差异的范围内[6(5%)对7(6%);P = 0.776]。评估显示低剂量脊髓镇痛组的I°和II°会阴撕裂更多[I°:28(23%)对3(2%);P<0.001-II°:30(25%)对2(2%);P<0.001]。新生儿参数仅在脐带碱剩余和脐静脉pH方面有显著差异[-5.40对-6.40;P = 0.005]。
LDSA对于分娩末期的患者来说是一种并发症发生率低且满意度高的方法。将LDSA纳入分娩期疼痛缓解方法中,对于分娩速度快的女性也能够在不影响患者满意度或围产期发病率的情况下实现疼痛减轻。