Brag Patrick, Piotter Volker, Plewa Klaus, Klein Alexander, Herzfeldt Mirko, Umbach Sascha
Department of Ultraclean Technology and Micromanufacturing, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstrasse 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Institute for Applied Materials (IAM-WK), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Hermann-von Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Sep 19;16(18):6276. doi: 10.3390/ma16186276.
In subtractive manufacturing processes, swarf, burrs or other residues are produced, which can impair the function of a tribological system (e.g., journal bearings). To prevent premature engine damage, cleanliness requirements are defined for production processes. Damaging particle tests are an experimental approach for validating these defined cleanliness requirements. This methodical approach is not yet widely used. For one, the test setup must be developed and proven for the respective application. For another, in order to carry out the tests in a systematic manner, defined test particles with properties similar to those of the contaminants encountered in reality are required. In the second part of the paper, the process chain for manufacturing artificial test swarf by micro powder injection molding (MicroPIM) is described. The size and shape of the swarf were derived from real swarf via several abstraction processes. Although certain design guidelines for MicroPIM parts could not be taken into account, the targeted manufacturing tolerances were achieved in most cases. During demolding, it became apparent that the higher ejection forces of the free-formed geometries must be taken more into account in the design of the mold. The experiments on the test setup also revealed that the artificial test swarf was unexpectedly brittle and was therefore ground up in the bearing gap without causing any substantial damage to the bearing. Thus, the artificial test swarf in its current sintered state is not a suitable substitute for micromilled swarf. However, MicroPIM could still be used to manufacture test particles in applications involving lower mechanical forces.
在减法制造工艺中,会产生切屑、毛刺或其他残留物,这些可能会损害摩擦学系统(如滑动轴承)的功能。为防止发动机过早损坏,对生产工艺定义了清洁度要求。破坏性颗粒测试是验证这些定义的清洁度要求的一种实验方法。这种系统方法尚未得到广泛应用。一方面,必须针对各自的应用开发并验证测试装置。另一方面,为了系统地进行测试,需要具有与实际遇到的污染物相似特性的定义测试颗粒。在论文的第二部分,描述了通过微粉注射成型(MicroPIM)制造人工测试切屑的工艺链。切屑的尺寸和形状通过几个抽象过程从实际切屑中得出。尽管无法考虑MicroPIM零件的某些设计准则,但在大多数情况下仍实现了目标制造公差。在脱模过程中,很明显在模具设计中必须更多地考虑自由成型几何形状的较高脱模力。测试装置上的实验还表明,人工测试切屑出人意料地脆,因此在轴承间隙中被磨碎,而不会对轴承造成任何实质性损坏。因此,当前烧结状态的人工测试切屑不是微铣切屑的合适替代品。然而,在涉及较低机械力的应用中,MicroPIM仍可用于制造测试颗粒。