Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Surgical Specialties, Vicenza Civil Hospital, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.
Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Surgical Specialties, San Gaetano Clinic, 36016 Thiene, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 28;59(9):1560. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091560.
. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor represented the first targeted and specialized approach to migraine prophylaxis. Nevertheless, they have been rarely considered in the treatment of vestibular migraine (VM). Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-CGRP mAbs in VM patients who did not respond to conventional migraine treatments. . Consecutive VM patients treated with erenumab were considered. As a comparison, we considered the same VM patients during conventional migraine treatments (i.e., propranolol, flunarizine, or valproic acid), which were tried before mAbs therapy. Videonystagmography, the Italian version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaire, and migraine days over the last 3 months were evaluated in all patients before and after treatments. . In the present retrospective study, we included 21 female and 2 male VM patients, mean age 45.2 years. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging that ruled out other causes of vertigo. The DHI questionnaire significantly improved after mAb therapy ( < 0.0001). Mean migraine days over the last 3 months were significantly reduced after treatment ( = 0.001). Videonystagmography was altered in 11 (48%) patients prior to monoclonal antibodies. We found vertical positional nystagmus in 9 patients and horizontal positional nystagmus in 2 patients. After the treatment, we found vertical positional nystagmus only in 1 patient ( = 0.002). When patients were treated with conventional therapies, there was no significant reduction in DHI, and instrumental vestibular examinations remained altered. . VM patients using anti-CGRP mAbs experienced a reduction in the dizziness-derived handicap, as reported in the DHI questionnaire. Furthermore, these treatments were significantly associated with a normalization of vestibular instrumental analysis. These findings were not seen with conventional treatments. Treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs may be effective in VM patients who did not respond to conventional migraine treatments. These findings should be tested in large, randomized clinical trials.
. 针对降钙素基因相关肽 (CGRP) 或其受体的单克隆抗体 (mAbs) 代表了偏头痛预防的首次靶向和专门方法。然而,它们在治疗前庭性偏头痛 (VM) 中很少被考虑。我们的目的是评估在常规偏头痛治疗无反应的 VM 患者中使用抗 CGRP mAbs 的疗效。. 连续治疗用依那西普的 VM 患者被认为是这种治疗的。作为比较,我们考虑了在 mAb 治疗前尝试过的相同 VM 患者(即普萘洛尔、氟桂利嗪或丙戊酸)的常规偏头痛治疗期间。所有患者在治疗前后均进行视频眼震图、意大利版眩晕障碍量表 (DHI) 问卷和过去 3 个月的偏头痛天数评估。. 在本回顾性研究中,我们纳入了 21 名女性和 2 名男性 VM 患者,平均年龄 45.2 岁。所有患者均行增强磁共振成像排除其他眩晕原因。mAb 治疗后 DHI 问卷显著改善 ( < 0.0001)。治疗后过去 3 个月的偏头痛天数显著减少 ( = 0.001)。在使用单克隆抗体之前,11 名(48%)患者的视频眼震图发生改变。我们发现 9 名患者存在垂直位置性眼震,2 名患者存在水平位置性眼震。治疗后,我们仅在 1 名患者中发现垂直位置性眼震 ( = 0.002)。当患者接受常规治疗时,DHI 无显著降低,仪器性前庭检查仍发生改变。. 使用抗 CGRP mAbs 的 VM 患者的 DHI 问卷报告的头晕相关残疾程度降低。此外,这些治疗与前庭仪器分析的正常化显著相关。这些发现在常规治疗中没有出现。在对常规偏头痛治疗无反应的 VM 患者中,抗 CGRP mAbs 的治疗可能有效。这些发现应在大型随机临床试验中进行检验。