• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高流量鼻导管和无创机械通气在 COVID-19 患者管理中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。

The Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Management of COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India.

Public Health Research Institute of India, Mysuru 570020, India.

出版信息

Viruses. 2023 Sep 5;15(9):1879. doi: 10.3390/v15091879.

DOI:10.3390/v15091879
PMID:37766286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10535869/
Abstract

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and ventilator-delivered non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) were used to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), due to lack of ventilators and manpower resources despite the paucity of data regarding their efficacy. This prospective study aimed to analyse the efficacy of HFNC versus NIV in the management of COVID-19 ARDS. A total of 88 RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients with moderate ARDS were recruited. Linear regression and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used for trends in vital parameters over time. A total of 37 patients were on HFNC, and 51 were on NIV. Patients in the HFNC group stayed slightly but not significantly longer in the ICU as compared to their NIV counterparts (HFNC vs. NIV: 8.00 (4.0-12.0) days vs. 7.00 (2.0-12.0) days; = 0.055). Intubation rates, complications, and mortality were similar in both groups. The switch to HFNC from NIV was 5.8%, while 37.8% required a switch to NIV from HFNC. The resolution of respiratory alkalosis was better with NIV. We conclude that in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with moderate ARDS, the duration of treatment in the ICU, intubation rate, and mortality did not differ significantly with the use of HFNC or NIV for respiratory support.

摘要

高流量鼻导管(HFNC)和呼吸机提供的无创机械通气(NIV)用于治疗 COVID-19 肺炎引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),尤其是在资源匮乏的中低收入国家(LMICs),由于缺乏呼吸机和人力资源,尽管关于其疗效的数据很少。这项前瞻性研究旨在分析 HFNC 与 NIV 在 COVID-19 ARDS 管理中的疗效。共招募了 88 例经 RT-PCR 确诊的 COVID-19 中度 ARDS 患者。线性回归和广义估计方程(GEEs)用于分析生命参数随时间的趋势。共有 37 例患者接受 HFNC 治疗,51 例患者接受 NIV 治疗。与 NIV 组相比,HFNC 组患者在 ICU 中停留的时间略长,但无统计学意义(HFNC 组 vs. NIV 组:8.00(4.0-12.0)天 vs. 7.00(2.0-12.0)天; = 0.055)。两组的插管率、并发症和死亡率相似。从 NIV 转为 HFNC 的比例为 5.8%,而 37.8%需要从 HFNC 转为 NIV。NIV 更有利于呼吸性碱中毒的缓解。我们得出结论,在 COVID-19 肺炎合并中度 ARDS 的患者中,使用 HFNC 或 NIV 进行呼吸支持治疗,ICU 治疗时间、插管率和死亡率无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/9a6292f9416c/viruses-15-01879-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/12e61d863eac/viruses-15-01879-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/46386dfb0ab0/viruses-15-01879-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/6e68f049b8e8/viruses-15-01879-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/8d555ef95c5d/viruses-15-01879-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/9a6292f9416c/viruses-15-01879-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/12e61d863eac/viruses-15-01879-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/46386dfb0ab0/viruses-15-01879-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/6e68f049b8e8/viruses-15-01879-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/8d555ef95c5d/viruses-15-01879-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c1/10535869/9a6292f9416c/viruses-15-01879-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Management of COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Study.高流量鼻导管和无创机械通气在 COVID-19 患者管理中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Viruses. 2023 Sep 5;15(9):1879. doi: 10.3390/v15091879.
2
Limitations of the ARDS criteria during high-flow oxygen or non-invasive ventilation: evidence from critically ill COVID-19 patients.在高流量氧疗或无创通气期间急性呼吸窘迫综合征标准的局限性:来自危重症 COVID-19 患者的证据。
Crit Care. 2022 Mar 7;26(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03933-1.
3
Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高流量鼻导管与无创通气在 COVID-19 患者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;16:17534666221113663. doi: 10.1177/17534666221113663.
4
Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.比较高流量鼻导管和无创通气在严重 COVID-19 肺炎引起的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭中的应用。
Respir Care. 2021 Dec;66(12):1824-1830. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09130. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
5
Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study.早期俯卧位联合 HFNC 或 NIV 治疗中重度 ARDS 的疗效和安全性:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2020 Jan 30;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2738-5.
6
Noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure by covid-19: A retrospective study of the feasibility, safety and outcomes.COVID-19 所致急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的无创通气和高流量鼻导管吸氧:一项回顾性研究其可行性、安全性和结局。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2022 Apr;298:103842. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2022.103842. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for patients with blunt chest trauma: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.高流量鼻导管氧疗与无创通气治疗钝性胸部创伤患者的随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 19;23(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06507-2.
8
Variation in Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation Among Patients With COVID-19.COVID-19 患者中高流量鼻导管和无创通气的使用差异。
Respir Care. 2022 Aug;67(8):929-938. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09672. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
9
High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is equally effective to noninvasive ventilation for mild-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with acute pancreatitis: A single-center, retrospective cohort study.高流量鼻导管氧疗与无创通气治疗急性胰腺炎合并轻中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征的效果相当:一项单中心、回顾性队列研究。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 1;30(5):302-309. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_24_24. Epub 2024 May 30.
10
Sequential application of oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot study.高流量鼻导管给氧与无创通气序贯应用于急性呼吸衰竭的观察性初步研究。
Respir Care. 2015 Feb;60(2):170-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03075. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Predictive Modeling for Respiratory Support with LLM-Driven Guideline Adherence.通过大语言模型驱动的指南遵循增强呼吸支持的预测建模
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 12:rs.3.rs-7230335. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7230335/v1.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高流量鼻导管与无创通气在 COVID-19 患者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;16:17534666221113663. doi: 10.1177/17534666221113663.
2
High-flow nasal oxygen alone or alternating with non-invasive ventilation in critically ill immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: a randomised controlled trial.高流量鼻氧疗单独或与无创通气交替用于免疫功能低下急性呼吸衰竭危重症患者的随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Jul;10(7):641-649. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00096-0. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
3
Effect of Noninvasive Respiratory Strategies on Intubation or Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and COVID-19: The RECOVERY-RS Randomized Clinical Trial.
急性低氧性呼吸衰竭和 COVID-19 患者应用无创性呼吸策略对插管或死亡率的影响:RECOVERY-RS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):546-558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0028.
4
Noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure by covid-19: A retrospective study of the feasibility, safety and outcomes.COVID-19 所致急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的无创通气和高流量鼻导管吸氧:一项回顾性研究其可行性、安全性和结局。
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2022 Apr;298:103842. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2022.103842. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
Benefits and risks of noninvasive oxygenation strategy in COVID-19: a multicenter, prospective cohort study (COVID-ICU) in 137 hospitals.COVID-19 患者无创氧合策略的获益与风险:137 家医院参与的多中心前瞻性队列研究(COVID-ICU)。
Crit Care. 2021 Dec 8;25(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03784-2.
6
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen for Severe Hypoxemia: Oxygenation Response and Outcome in Patients with COVID-19.高流量鼻氧疗治疗严重低氧血症:COVID-19 患者的氧合反应和结局。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb 15;205(4):431-439. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2163OC.
7
Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.比较高流量鼻导管和无创通气在严重 COVID-19 肺炎引起的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭中的应用。
Respir Care. 2021 Dec;66(12):1824-1830. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09130. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
8
Prone Positioning Is Safe and May Reduce the Rate of Intubation in Selected COVID-19 Patients Receiving High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy.俯卧位通气对部分接受高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗的新冠患者安全且可能降低插管率。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 30;10(15):3404. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153404.
9
[Effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on the clinical efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome].无创正压通气和高流量鼻导管氧疗对2019冠状病毒病急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者临床疗效的影响
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Jun;33(6):708-713. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210104-00002.
10
Spontaneous pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema in patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的自发性纵隔气肿和皮下气肿
Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Apr-Jun;15(2):93-96. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_939_20. Epub 2021 Apr 1.