Starch-Jensen Thomas, Schou Søren, Terheyden Hendrik, Bruun Niels Henrik, Aludden Hanna
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, The Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Dec;34(12):1406-1416. doi: 10.1111/clr.14186. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
Test the hypothesis of no difference in bone regeneration after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with different ratios of iliac or mandibular autogenous bone (AB) graft and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM).
Forty minipigs were randomly allocated to bilateral MSFA using: (A) 100% AB, (B) 75% AB and 25% DBBM, (C) 50% AB and 50% DBBM, (D) 25% AB and 75% DBBM, or (E) 100% DBBM. The animals were euthanized 12 weeks after surgery. Percentage of bone, non-mineralized tissue, and residual DBBM were estimated by histomorphometric analysis in a randomly selected region of interest and summarized as mean percentage with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Mean percentage of bone following MSFA with iliac or mandibular AB graft was: (A) 55.5% and 64.2%, (B) 60.3% and 61.6%, (C) 54.4% and 52.1%, (D) 51.8% and 53.1%, and (E) 47.6%, respectively. There was a significant trend toward a higher percentage of bone, with a higher ratio of AB within the graft (p < .01), regardless of the origin of AB graft (iliac or mandible).
The hypothesis was rejected since percentage of bone was significantly increased with larger proportions of AB within the graft. Consequently, AB or a mixture of AB and diminutive quantities of DBBM seem to be the preferred graft for MSFA based solely on histomorphometric assessment. However, it should be emphasized that newly formed bone and residual AB graft particles could not be distinguished by the applied histologic procedure.
验证在上颌窦底提升术(MSFA)中,使用不同比例的髂骨或下颌骨自体骨(AB)移植骨与脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM)后骨再生无差异这一假设。
40只小型猪被随机分配至双侧MSFA组,使用:(A)100% AB;(B)75% AB和25% DBBM;(C)50% AB和50% DBBM;(D)25% AB和75% DBBM;或(E)100% DBBM。术后12周对动物实施安乐死。通过组织形态计量学分析在随机选择的感兴趣区域估计骨、非矿化组织和残余DBBM的百分比,并汇总为具有95%置信区间(CI)的平均百分比。
使用髂骨或下颌骨AB移植骨进行MSFA后的平均骨百分比分别为:(A)55.5%和64.2%;(B)60.3%和61.6%;(C)54.4%和52.1%;(D)51.8%和53.1%;以及(E)47.6%。无论AB移植骨的来源(髂骨或下颌骨)如何,移植骨中AB比例越高,骨百分比有显著升高的趋势(p < 0.01)。
该假设被拒绝,因为移植骨中AB比例越大,骨百分比显著增加。因此,仅基于组织形态计量学评估,AB或AB与少量DBBM的混合物似乎是MSFA的首选移植材料。然而,应强调的是,应用的组织学方法无法区分新形成的骨和残余的AB移植颗粒。