Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Applied Statistics Group, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1815-1823. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad276.
Breast reconstruction is offered to improve quality of life for women after mastectomy for breast cancer, but information regarding the long-term patient-reported outcomes of different reconstruction procedures is currently lacking. The Brighter study aimed to evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in a population-based cohort.
Women who underwent mastectomy with IBR for breast cancer in England between 1 January 2008 and 31 March 2009 were identified from National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics. Surviving women were invited to complete the BREAST-Q, EQ-5D-5L™, and ICECAP-A at least 12 years after the index procedure. Questionnaires were scored according to developers' instructions and compared by IBR type.
Some 1236 women underwent IBR; 343 (27.8 per cent) had 2-stage expander/implant, 630 (51.0 per cent) latissimus dorsi, and 263 (21.3 per cent) abdominal flap reconstructions, with a mean(s.d.) follow-up of 13.3(0.5) years. Women who underwent abdominal flap reconstruction reported higher scores in all BREAST-Q domains than those who had other procedures. These differences remained statistically significant and clinically meaningful after adjusting for age, ethnicity, geographical region, socioeconomic status, smoking, BMI, and complications. The greatest difference was seen in scores for satisfaction with breasts; women who had abdominal flap reconstructions reported scores that were 13.17 (95 per cent c.i. 9.48 to 16.87) points; P < 0.001) higher than those among women who had two-stage expander/implant procedures. Women who underwent latissimus dorsi reconstruction reported significantly more pain/discomfort on the EQ-5D-5L™, but no other differences between procedures were seen.
Long-term patient-reported outcomes are significantly better following abdominal flap reconstruction than other traditional procedure types. These findings should be shared with women considering IBR to help them make informed decisions about their surgical options.
乳腺癌乳房切除术患者可选择乳房重建以改善生活质量,但目前缺乏不同重建手术长期患者报告结局的相关信息。Brighter 研究旨在评估基于人群队列中即刻乳房重建(IBR)后的长期患者报告结局。
从英国国家卫生服务医院住院统计数据中确定 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 3 月 31 日期间因乳腺癌行乳房切除术并接受 IBR 的女性。对健在的女性在索引手术后至少 12 年时邀请其完成 BREAST-Q、EQ-5D-5L™ 和 ICECAP-A 问卷。根据开发者的说明对问卷进行评分,并按 IBR 类型进行比较。
共有 1236 名女性接受了 IBR;2 期扩张器/植入物 343 例(27.8%)、背阔肌 630 例(51.0%)、腹壁皮瓣 263 例(21.3%),平均(s.d.)随访 13.3(0.5)年。接受腹壁皮瓣重建的女性在所有 BREAST-Q 领域的评分均高于其他手术组。在调整年龄、种族、地理位置、社会经济地位、吸烟、BMI 和并发症后,这些差异仍然具有统计学意义和临床意义。差异最大的是对乳房满意度的评分;接受腹壁皮瓣重建的女性报告的评分比接受 2 期扩张器/植入物手术的女性高 13.17(95%置信区间 9.48 至 16.87;P < 0.001)。接受背阔肌重建的女性在 EQ-5D-5L™上报告的疼痛/不适明显更多,但在手术类型之间未观察到其他差异。
与其他传统手术类型相比,腹壁皮瓣重建后患者报告的长期结局明显更好。这些发现应该与考虑 IBR 的女性分享,以帮助她们对手术选择做出知情决策。