• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于变化点的分析程序,用于提高具有延迟治疗效果的临床试验中决策的成功率。

A change point-based analysis procedure for improving the success rate of decision-making in clinical trials with delayed treatment effects.

作者信息

Xie Long-Shen, Lu Hui

机构信息

Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, SJTU-Yale Joint Center for Biostatistics and Data Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 11;14:1186456. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1186456. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2023.1186456
PMID:37767405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10520459/
Abstract

A delayed treatment effect is a commonly observed phenomenon in tumor immunotherapy clinical trials. It can cause a loss of statistical power and complicate the interpretation of the analytical findings. This phenomenon also poses challenges for interim analysis in the context of phase II/III seamless design or group sequential design. It shows potential to lead researchers to make incorrect go/no-go decisions. Despite its significance, rare research has explored the impact of delayed treatment effects on the decision success rate of the interim analysis and the methods to compensate for this loss. In this study, we propose an analysis procedure based on change points for improving the decision success rate at the interim analysis in the presence of delayed treatment effects. This procedure primarily involves three steps: I. detecting and testing the number and locations of change points; II. estimating treatment efficacy; and III. making go/no-go decisions. Simulation results demonstrate that when there is a delayed treatment effect with a single change point, using the proposed analysis procedure significantly improves the decision success rate while controlling the type I error rate. Moreover, the proposed method exhibits very little disparity compared to the unadjusted method when the proportional hazards assumption holds. Therefore, the proposed analysis procedure provides a feasible approach for decision-making at the interim analysis when delayed treatment effects are present.

摘要

延迟治疗效应是肿瘤免疫治疗临床试验中常见的现象。它可能导致统计效能的损失,并使分析结果的解释复杂化。这种现象在II/III期无缝设计或成组序贯设计的中期分析中也带来了挑战。它有可能导致研究人员做出错误的继续/终止决策。尽管其具有重要意义,但很少有研究探讨延迟治疗效应对中期分析决策成功率的影响以及弥补这种损失的方法。在本研究中,我们提出了一种基于变化点的分析程序,以提高存在延迟治疗效应时中期分析的决策成功率。该程序主要包括三个步骤:I. 检测和检验变化点的数量和位置;II. 估计治疗效果;III. 做出继续/终止决策。模拟结果表明,当存在具有单个变化点的延迟治疗效应时,使用所提出的分析程序在控制I型错误率的同时显著提高了决策成功率。此外,当比例风险假设成立时,所提出的方法与未调整的方法相比差异很小。因此,所提出的分析程序为存在延迟治疗效应时的中期分析决策提供了一种可行的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/a9d6fcea1ffd/fphar-14-1186456-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/7aad423a692a/fphar-14-1186456-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/7c15eb74b3a4/fphar-14-1186456-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/4fadb56624e2/fphar-14-1186456-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/4aba09520b2a/fphar-14-1186456-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/a9d6fcea1ffd/fphar-14-1186456-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/7aad423a692a/fphar-14-1186456-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/7c15eb74b3a4/fphar-14-1186456-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/4fadb56624e2/fphar-14-1186456-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/4aba09520b2a/fphar-14-1186456-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a581/10520459/a9d6fcea1ffd/fphar-14-1186456-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A change point-based analysis procedure for improving the success rate of decision-making in clinical trials with delayed treatment effects.一种基于变化点的分析程序,用于提高具有延迟治疗效果的临床试验中决策的成功率。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 11;14:1186456. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1186456. eCollection 2023.
2
Optimal decision-making in oncology development programs based on probability of success for phase III utilizing phase II/III data on response and overall survival.基于利用 II/III 期数据评估反应和总生存期的 III 期成功率,优化肿瘤开发项目的决策。
Pharm Stat. 2020 Nov;19(6):861-881. doi: 10.1002/pst.2042. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
Optimal seamless phase 2/3 oncology trial designs based on Probability of Success (PoS).基于成功率 (PoS) 的最优无缝 2/3 期肿瘤学试验设计。
Stat Med. 2018 Dec 10;37(28):4097-4113. doi: 10.1002/sim.7910. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
4
The use of phase 2 interim analysis to expedite drug development decisions.使用2期中期分析来加快药物研发决策。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 20.
5
Information time scales for interim analyses of randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验期中分析的信息时间尺度
Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):391-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774516644752. Epub 2016 May 2.
6
Sample size adjustment based on promising interim results and its application in confirmatory clinical trials.基于有前景的中期结果的样本量调整及其在确证性临床试验中的应用。
Clin Trials. 2015 Dec;12(6):584-95. doi: 10.1177/1740774515594378. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
7
Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.在终点为直至某个指定时间点的生存情况的无缝II/III期试验中用于中期适应性调整的贝叶斯预测能力。
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 30;26(27):4925-38. doi: 10.1002/sim.2957.
8
Interim analysis based on the weighted log-rank test for delayed treatment effects under staggered patient entry.基于交错患者入组情况下延迟治疗效果的加权对数秩检验的中期分析。
J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(5):842-58. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2015.1094809. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
9
Quantitative decision-making in randomized Phase II studies with a time-to-event endpoint.具有事件发生时间终点的随机II期研究中的定量决策
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(1):189-202. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1489400. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
Adaptive promising zone design for cancer immunotherapy with heterogeneous delayed treatment effect.具有异质延迟治疗效果的癌症免疫治疗的自适应有前景区域设计
J Biopharm Stat. 2025 May;35(3):437-456. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2024.2341674. Epub 2024 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of HBM4003 combined with toripalimab in refractory neuroendocrine neoplasms: a multicenter, phase II study.HBM4003联合托瑞帕利单抗治疗难治性神经内分泌肿瘤的疗效与安全性:一项多中心II期研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 3;84:103249. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103249. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Decision-Making Criteria and Methods for Initiating Late-Stage Clinical Trials in Drug Development From a Multi-Stakeholder Perspective: A Scoping Review.从多利益相关方角度看药物研发中启动后期临床试验的决策标准与方法:一项范围综述
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;117(4):978-988. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3566. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
KEYNOTE-033: Randomized phase 3 study of pembrolizumab vs docetaxel in previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC.KEYNOTE-033:帕博利珠单抗对比多西他赛治疗既往治疗、PD-L1 阳性、晚期 NSCLC 的随机 3 期研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Aug 1;153(3):623-634. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34532. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
Group sequential monitoring based on the maximum of weighted log-rank statistics with the Fleming-Harrington class of weights in oncology clinical trials.基于 Fleming-Harrington 类权重的加权对数秩统计量最大值的组序贯监测在肿瘤学临床试验中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3525-3532. doi: 10.1177/0962280220931560. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Determining the extent and frequency of on-site monitoring: a bayesian risk-based approach.
确定现场监测的范围和频率:一种基于贝叶斯风险的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02261-y.
A novel Bayesian continuous piecewise linear log-hazard model, with estimation and inference via reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
一种新颖的贝叶斯连续分段线性对数风险模型,通过可逆跳跃马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗进行估计和推断。
Stat Med. 2020 May 30;39(12):1766-1780. doi: 10.1002/sim.8511. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
4
Pembrolizumab As Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial.帕博利珠单抗作为 KEYNOTE-240 中晚期肝细胞癌二线治疗的疗效:一项随机、双盲、III 期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;38(3):193-202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01307. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.帕博利珠单抗用于治疗肝细胞癌。
Liver Cancer. 2019 May;8(3):143-154. doi: 10.1159/000500143. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
Interim monitoring using the adaptively weighted log-rank test in clinical trials for survival outcomes.生存结局临床试验中使用适应性加权对数秩检验的期中监测。
Stat Med. 2019 Feb 20;38(4):601-612. doi: 10.1002/sim.7958. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade.使用免疫检查点阻断的癌症免疫疗法。
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1350-1355. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4060. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.帕博利珠单抗对比化疗用于 PD-L1 阳性非小细胞肺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606774. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
9
Group sequential monitoring based on the weighted log-rank test statistic with the Fleming-Harrington class of weights in cancer vaccine studies.在癌症疫苗研究中,基于加权对数秩检验统计量并采用弗莱明 - 哈林顿权重类别的序贯监测。
Pharm Stat. 2016 Sep;15(5):412-9. doi: 10.1002/pst.1760. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Cancer immunotherapy: the beginning of the end of cancer?癌症免疫疗法:癌症终结的开端?
BMC Med. 2016 May 5;14:73. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0623-5.