Department of Solar System Sciences, Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Sagamihara, Japan.
Space and Astronautical Science, Graduate Institute for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI, Hayama, Japan.
Astrobiology. 2023 Oct;23(10):1099-1117. doi: 10.1089/ast.2022.0148. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
We present a comparative study of the methods used in the search for extraterrestrial microorganism life, including a summary table where different life-detection techniques can be easily compared as an aid to mission and instrument design aimed at life detection. This is an extension of previous study, where detection techniques for a series of target characteristics and molecules that could constitute a positive life detection were evaluated. This comparison has been extended with a particular consideration to sources of false positives, the causes of negative detection, the results of detection techniques when presented regarding terrestrial life, and additional science objectives that could be achieved outside the primary aim of detecting life. These additions address both the scientific and programmatic side of exploration mission design, where a successful proposal must demonstrate probable outcomes and be able to return valuable results even if no life is found. The applicability of the life detection techniques is considered for Earth life, Earth-independent life (life emerging independently from that on Earth,) and Earth-kin life (sharing a common ancestor with life on Earth), and techniques effective in detecting Earth life should also be useful in the detection of Earth-kin life. However, their applicability is not guaranteed for Earth-independent life. As found in our previous study, there exists no realistic single detection method that can conclusively determine the discovery of extraterrestrial life, and no method is superior to all others. In this study, we further consider combinations of detection techniques and identify imaging as a valuable addition to molecule detection methods, even in cases where there is insufficient resolution to observe the detailed morphology of a microbial cell. The search for extraterrestrial life is further divided into a survey-and-detection and analysis-and-conclusion step. These steps benefit from different detection techniques, but imaging is necessary for both parts.
我们呈现了一项对外星微生物生命探测方法的比较研究,其中包括一个汇总表,可方便地比较不同的生命探测技术,以辅助针对生命探测的任务和仪器设计。这是对先前研究的扩展,其中评估了一系列目标特征和可能构成阳性生命探测的分子的探测技术。与之前的研究相比,此次比较特别考虑了假阳性的来源、阴性探测的原因、在呈现关于地球生命的探测技术的结果时,以及在探测生命的主要目标之外可能实现的其他科学目标。这些补充内容涉及探索任务设计的科学和计划方面,其中一个成功的提案必须展示可能的结果,并且即使没有发现生命,也能够返回有价值的结果。考虑了生命探测技术在地球生命、地球独立生命(独立于地球的生命)和地球亲缘生命(与地球上的生命有共同祖先)中的适用性,在探测地球生命方面有效的技术也应该有助于探测地球亲缘生命。然而,对于地球独立生命,它们的适用性并不能得到保证。正如我们之前的研究发现的那样,不存在能够明确确定外星生命发现的单一现实探测方法,也没有哪种方法优于其他方法。在这项研究中,我们进一步考虑了探测技术的组合,并确定成像技术是分子探测方法的有价值的补充,即使在分辨率不足以观察微生物细胞详细形态的情况下也是如此。外星生命的搜索进一步分为调查和探测以及分析和结论两个步骤。这两个步骤受益于不同的探测技术,但成像对于这两个部分都是必要的。