• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代口吃临床对话:神经多样性和能力主义。

Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: Neurodiversity and ableism.

机构信息

Private Practice, Montreal, Canada.

University of Iowa, Communication Sciences and Disorders, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Fluency Disord. 2023 Dec;78:106014. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.106014. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.106014
PMID:37769595
Abstract

PURPOSE

To discuss issues about neurodiversity and ableism, and how they pertain to clinical management of stuttering, with particular reference to early childhood stuttering.

METHODS

During a webinar this year, the issue emerged of how concepts of neurodiversity and ableism apply to early childhood stuttering during the pre-school years. It became apparent that this topic elicited disparate views and would be of particular interest to students of speech-language pathology. Consequently, the leaders of that webinar continued the conversation by written dialogue for the purpose of placing it on record.

RESULTS

The discussants reached agreement on many points, but there was some diversity of viewpoint about how neurodiversity and ableism should apply to clinical practice with children who have recently begun to stutter.

摘要

目的

讨论神经多样性和能力主义的问题,以及它们与口吃的临床管理有何关联,特别是针对儿童早期口吃。

方法

今年在一次网络研讨会上,出现了神经多样性和能力主义的概念如何适用于学龄前儿童早期口吃的问题。显然,这个话题引起了不同的观点,并且对口吃病理学生来说特别感兴趣。因此,该网络研讨会的领导人通过书面对话继续进行对话,以便将其记录在案。

结果

讨论者在许多观点上达成了一致,但对于神经多样性和能力主义应该如何应用于刚刚开始口吃的儿童的临床实践,观点存在一定的差异。

相似文献

1
Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: Neurodiversity and ableism.当代口吃临床对话:神经多样性和能力主义。
J Fluency Disord. 2023 Dec;78:106014. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.106014. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
Psychosocial features of stuttering for school-age children: A systematic review.学龄儿童口吃的社会心理特征:一项系统综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Sep-Oct;58(5):1829-1845. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12887. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: Can intervention stop early stuttering development?当代关于口吃的临床探讨:干预能否阻止早期口吃的发展?
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Sep 1:1-8. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2024.2371870.
4
Non-pharmacological interventions for stuttering in children six years and younger.针对 6 岁及以下儿童口吃的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 9;9(9):CD013489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013489.pub2.
5
Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: Telling parents why their child began to stutter.当代关于口吃的临床对话:向家长解释孩子开始口吃的原因。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jun 27:1-6. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2025.2520534.
6
Developmental language disorder and neurodiversity: Surfacing contradictions, tensions and unanswered questions.发展性语言障碍与神经多样性:揭示矛盾、紧张关系和未解决的问题。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1505-1516. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13009. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
7
Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions of Their Competence in Managing Stuttering: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.言语语言病理学家对自身管理口吃能力的认知:一项叙事性综合系统评价
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 May-Jun;60(3):e70040. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70040.
8
Non-pharmacological treatments for stuttering in children and adults: a systematic review and evaluation of clinical effectiveness, and exploration of barriers to successful outcomes.儿童和成人口吃的非药物治疗:临床疗效的系统评价与评估以及成功治疗障碍的探索
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jan;20(2):1-302, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta20020.
9
Stuttering interventions for children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review as a part of clinical guidelines.口吃干预措施:针对儿童、青少年和成年人的系统评价,作为临床指南的一部分。
J Commun Disord. 2022 Sep-Oct;99:106242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106242. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
10
A Viewpoint on the Ethics of Pseudostuttering Assignments: Guidelines and Best Practices for Their Use.关于假性口吃任务伦理的观点:使用指南及最佳实践
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jan 7;34(1):428-436. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00139. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder Perspectives on the Responsible Innovation in Health Framework for Addressing Stigma-Based Health Inequalities Among People Who Stutter.利益相关者对解决口吃者基于耻辱感的健康不平等问题的健康领域负责任创新框架的看法。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70115. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70115.
2
Stuttering: Our Current Knowledge, Research Opportunities, and Ways to Address Critical Gaps.口吃:我们目前的认知、研究机遇及填补关键空白的方法
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Apr 2;6. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00162. eCollection 2025.
3
Neurodiversity in Saudi Arabia: Towards quality education and reduced inequalities.
沙特阿拉伯的神经多样性:迈向优质教育与减少不平等
F1000Res. 2024 Dec 9;13:1062. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.155002.2. eCollection 2024.
4
An annotated introductory reading list for neurodiversity.一份关于神经多样性的带注释的入门阅读书单。
Elife. 2024 Dec 4;13:e102467. doi: 10.7554/eLife.102467.
5
Contemporary clinical conversations about stuttering: What does brain imaging research mean to clinicians?当代关于口吃的临床探讨:脑成像研究对临床医生意味着什么?
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Apr;27(2):265-271. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2024.2327472. Epub 2024 Mar 26.